J. Mater. Sci. Technol. ›› 2019, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (7): 1412-1421.DOI: 10.1016/j.jmst.2019.01.018
• Orginal Article • Previous Articles Next Articles
X.C. Liuab*, Y.F. Sunac, T. Nagiraa, K. Ushiodaa, H. Fujiia**
Received:
2018-11-29
Revised:
2019-01-19
Accepted:
2019-01-20
Online:
2019-07-20
Published:
2019-06-20
Contact:
Liu X.C.,Fujii H.
About author:
1These authors contributed equally to this work.
X.C. Liu, Y.F. Sun, T. Nagira, K. Ushioda, H. Fujii. Evaluation of dynamic development of grain structure during friction stir welding of pure copper using a quasi in situ method[J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2019, 35(7): 1412-1421.
Fig. 1. Horizontal and longitudinal cross-sections of the keyhole showing the rotation flow zone by the tool traversing two dissimilar copper alloys (800 rpm-100 mm/min).
Fig. 3. Material flow features, strain and strain rate distributions on the keyhole horizontal planes [23]: (a) and (c) are the material flow on the 0.5-mm-plane and the corresponding strain, material flow velocity and strain rate, respectively; (b) and (d) are the material flow on the 2.5-mm-plane and the corresponding strain and strain rate, respectively.
Fig. 4. Microstructural features of the base material (a-d) and the preheating stage (e-h) (x = -7, 0.5-mm-plane): (a, e) EBSD orientation map; (b, f) grain boundaries map; (c, g) misorientation distribution; (d, h) (001) PF. Note: the welding direction (WD) is the same as the rolling direction (RD) of the base material.
Fig. 5. Variations in the grain size, LABs fraction and TBs fraction with respect to the accumulative true strain at the acceleration stage: (a) 0.5-mm-plane; (b) 2.5-mm-plane. Note: the error bars are based on multiple measurements.
Fig. 6. Variations in the grain structure on the 0.5-mm-plane at the acceleration stage shown by the EBSD orientation maps (a-c) and grain boundary maps (d-f): (a, d) ε=0.06, x = -4; (b, e) ε=0.92, x = -2; (c, f) ε=1.45, x = -0.5.
Fig. 7. Variations in the grain structure on the 2.5-mm-plane at the acceleration stage shown by the EBSD orientation maps (a-d) and grain boundary maps (e-h): (a, e) ε=0.05, x = -3; (b, f) ε=0.10, x = -2.5; (c, g) ε=0.32, x = -2; (d, h)ε≈1.03, x =-1.5.
Fig. 8. Mechanisms of the grain structure evolution at the acceleration stage: (a, d) IPF maps of the local microstructures; (b, e) the corresponding grain boundary maps and (c, f) KAM maps; (g-i) grain boundary maps showing perfect twins evolving into common grains; in the grain boundary maps, the blue, red and green lines represent HABs, LABs and Σ3 TBs, respectively; in the KAM maps, the black lines represent HABs.
Fig. 9. Orientation relationship between the recrystallized grains and the deformed grains (x = -2.5, 2.5-mm-plane): (a) EBSD image quality map of the recrystallized grains (orientation spread<2°); (b) (001) PF in the SD and SPN; (c) inverse PF in the normal direction; (d) EBSD image quality map of the deformed grains (orientation spread>2°); (e) (111) PF in the SD and SPN; (f) inverse PF in the shear direction; red lines denote LABs, blue lines denote HABs and green lines denote Σ3 TBs.
Fig. 10. Microstructural features at the high-velocity flow stage: (a, c) the 0.5-mm-plane, x = 0; (b, d) the 2.5-mm-plane, x = 1; (a, b) grain boundary map; (c, d) misorientation distribution.
Fig. 11. Variations in the statistical grain size, LABs fraction and Σ3 TBs fraction with respect to the accumulative true strain at the deceleration stage on the 0.5-mm-plane. Note: the error bars are based on multiple measurements.
Fig. 12. Variations in the grain structure at the deceleration stage on the 0.5-mm-plane shown by the EBSD orientation maps (a-d) and grain boundary maps (e-h): (a, e) ε=1.62, x = 1; (b, f) ε=2.02, x = 2; (c, g) ε=2.54, x = 3; (d, h) ε=2.69, x = 4.
x value (mm) | 2 | 4 | 6 | 8 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Grain size (μm) | 1.49 | 1.64 | 1.82 | 2.03 |
LABs fraction | 0.383 | 0.156 | 0.109 | 0.092 |
Σ3 fraction | 0.047 | 0.243 | 0.317 | 0.367 |
Table 1 Variations in the statistic grain size, LABs fraction and Σ3 TBs fraction at the annealing stage on the 2.5-mm-plane.
x value (mm) | 2 | 4 | 6 | 8 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Grain size (μm) | 1.49 | 1.64 | 1.82 | 2.03 |
LABs fraction | 0.383 | 0.156 | 0.109 | 0.092 |
Σ3 fraction | 0.047 | 0.243 | 0.317 | 0.367 |
Fig. 13. Grain structures (a1, b1) and corresponding orientation distribution functions (a2, b2) at the annealing stage (2.5-mm-plane): (a1, 2) x = 2; (b1, 2) x = 8. (Note: the R-cube here denotes the 45° rotated cube).
|
[1] | L.Y. Zhao, H. Yan, R.S. Chen, En-Hou Han. Orientations of nuclei during static recrystallization in a cold-rolled Mg-Zn-Gd alloy [J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2021, 60(0): 162-167. |
[2] | S.D. Ji, Q. Wen, Z.W. Li. A novel friction stir diffusion bonding process using convex-vortex pin tools [J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2020, 48(0): 23-30. |
[3] | Mengcheng Zhou, Xinfang Zhang. Optimization of <001> grain gene based on texture hereditary behavior of magnetic materials [J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2020, 38(0): 1-6. |
[4] | C. Yang, J.F. Zhang, G.N. Ma, L.H. Wu, X.M. Zhang, G.Z. He, P. Xue, D.R. Ni, B.L. Xiao, K.S. Wang, Z.Y. Ma. Microstructure and mechanical properties of double-side friction stir welded 6082Al ultra-thick plates [J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2020, 41(0): 105-116. |
[5] | S.C. Han, L.H. Wu, C.Y. Jiang, N. Li, C.L. Jia, P. Xue, H. Zhang, H.B. Zhao, D.R. Ni, B.L. Xiao, Z.Y. Ma. Achieving a strong polypropylene/aluminum alloy friction spot joint via a surface laser processing pretreatment [J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2020, 50(0): 103-114. |
[6] | S.H. Lu, D. Wu, R.S. Chen, En-hou Han. Microstructure and texture optimization by static recrystallization originating from {10-12} extension twins in a Mg-Gd-Y alloy [J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2020, 59(0): 44-60. |
[7] | Wei Hu, Zhongwei Ma, Shude Ji, Qi Song, Mingfei Chen, Wenhui Jiang. Improving the mechanical property of dissimilar Al/Mg hybrid friction stir welding joint by PIO-ANN [J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2020, 53(0): 41-52. |
[8] | Zhiqiang Zhang, Changshu He, Ying Li, Lei Yu, Su Zhao, Xiang Zhao. Effects of ultrasonic assisted friction stir welding on flow behavior, microstructure and mechanical properties of 7N01-T4 aluminum alloy joints [J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2020, 43(0): 1-13. |
[9] | Weijie Ren, Dejia Liu, Qing Liu, Renlong Xin. Influence of texture distribution in magnesium welds on their non-uniform mechanical behavior: A CPFEM study [J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2020, 46(0): 168-176. |
[10] | Yingdong Zhang, Fusen Yuan, Fuzhou Han, Muhammad Ali, Wenbin Guo, Geping Li, Chengze Liu, Hengfei Gu. The influence of microtexture on the formation mechanism of nodules in Zircaloy-4 alloy tube [J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2020, 47(0): 68-75. |
[11] | Mariana X. Milagre, Uyime Donatus, Naga V. Mogili, Rejane Maria P. Silva, Bárbara Victória G. de Viveiros, Victor F. Pereira, Renato A. Antunes, Caruline S.C. Machado, João Victor S. Araujo, Isolda Costa. Galvanic and asymmetry effects on the local electrochemical behavior of the 2098-T351 alloy welded by friction stir welding [J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2020, 45(0): 162-175. |
[12] | Yongxian Huang, Yuming Xie, Xiangchen Meng, Junchen Li, Li Zhou. Joint formation mechanism of high depth-to-width ratio friction stir welding [J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2019, 35(7): 1261-1269. |
[13] | H. Zhang, P. Xue, D. Wang, L.H. Wu, D.R. Ni, B.L. Xiao, Z.Y. Ma. Effect of heat-input on pitting corrosion behavior of friction stir welded high nitrogen stainless steel [J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2019, 35(7): 1278-1283. |
[14] | X.H. Zeng, P. Xue, L.H. Wu, D.R. Ni, B.L. Xiao, K.S. Wang, Z.Y. Ma. Microstructural evolution of aluminum alloy during friction stir welding under different tool rotation rates and cooling conditions [J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2019, 35(6): 972-981. |
[15] | Q. Chu, W.Y. Li, H.L. Hou, X.W. Yang, A. Vairis, C. Wang, W.B. Wang. On the double-side probeless friction stir spot welding of AA2198 Al-Li alloy [J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2019, 35(5): 784-789. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||