J Mater Sci Technol ›› 2011, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (10): 920-930.

• Iron and Steel • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Crystallographic Analysis of Martensite in 0.2C-2.0Mn-1.5Si-0.6Cr Steel using EBSD

Pasi P. Suikkanen1), Cyril Cayron2), Anthony J. DeArdo3), L. Pentti Karjalainen1)   

  1. 1) Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Oulu, Box 4200, 90014 University of Oulu, Finland
    2) CEA, LITEN, 17 rues des Martys, 38054, Grenoble, France
    3) Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Pittsburgh, 848 Benedum Hall, Pittsburgh, PA, 15261-2285, USA
  • Received:2010-09-16 Revised:2011-06-23 Online:2011-10-31 Published:2011-10-24
  • Contact: Pasi PekkaSuikkanen

Abstract: The crystallography of martensite formed in 0.2C-2.0Mn-1.5Si-0.6Cr steel was studied using the electron backscattered diffraction (EBSD) technique. The results showed that the observed orientation relationship (OR) was closer to that of Nishiyama-Wassermann (N-W) than Kurdjumov-Sachs. The martensite consisted of parallel laths forming morphological packets. Typically, there were three different lath orientations in a morphological packet consisting of three specific N-W OR variants sharing the same {111} austenite plane. A packet of martensite laths with a common {111} austenite plane was termed a crystallographic packet. Generally, the crystallographic packet size corresponded to the morphological packet size, but occasionally the morphological packet was found to consist of two or more crystallographic packets. Therefore, the crystallographic packet size appeared to be finer than the morphological packet size. The relative orientation between the variants in crystallographic packets was found to be near 60°/<110>, which explains the strong peak
observed near 60° in the grain boundary misorientation distribution. Martensite also contained a high fraction of boundaries with a misorientation in the range 2.5-8°. Typically these boundaries were found to be located inside the martensite laths forming sub-laths.

Key words: Martensite, Austenite, Nishiyama-Wassermann orientation relationship, EBSD, Crystallography, Packet