J. Mater. Sci. Technol. ›› 2019, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (11): 2447-2462.DOI: 10.1016/j.jmst.2019.07.011
• Orginal Article • Previous Articles Next Articles
Song Jiangabcd, Peng-Xiang Houae, Chang Liuae*(), Hui-Ming Chengabef**(
)
Received:
2019-03-07
Revised:
2019-04-24
Accepted:
2019-06-12
Online:
2019-11-05
Published:
2019-10-21
Contact:
Liu Chang,Cheng Hui-Ming
About author:
1The authors equally contributed to this work.
Song Jiang, Peng-Xiang Hou, Chang Liu, Hui-Ming Cheng. High-performance single-wall carbon nanotube transparent conductive films[J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2019, 35(11): 2447-2462.
Application | Minimum T (%) | Maximum Rs (Ω/sq.) |
---|---|---|
Touch screens | 85 | 500 |
LCDs | 85 | 100 |
OLEDs | 90 | 50 |
PVs | 90 | 10 |
Table 1 Performance requirements for the practical applications of TCFs [2].
Application | Minimum T (%) | Maximum Rs (Ω/sq.) |
---|---|---|
Touch screens | 85 | 500 |
LCDs | 85 | 100 |
OLEDs | 90 | 50 |
PVs | 90 | 10 |
Year | Preparation method | Rs (pristine) (Ω/sq.) | Dopant | Rs (doped) (Ω/sq.) | T (%) | FoM (pristine) | FoM (doped) | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2004 | Wet process | HNO3 | 30 | 70 | 32.2 | [ | ||
2005 | Wet process | 1000 | 90 | 3.5 | [ | |||
2006 | Wet process | 300 | NO2 | 100 | 90 | 11.6 | 34.8 | [ |
2007 | Wet process | 175 | HNO3 | 70 | 80 | 9.1 | 22.8 | [ |
2007 | Dry process | 50 | 70 | 19.3 | [ | |||
2008 | Wet process | 1560 | SOCl2 | 180 | 59 | 0.4 | 3.5 | [ |
2008 | Wet process | 231 | 75 | 5.3 | [ | |||
2009 | Wet process | 110 | 80 | 14.5 | [ | |||
2009 | Wet process | HNO3+ H2SO4 or HCl | 270 | 93.5 | 20.4 | [ | ||
2010 | Wet process | 187 | 80 | 8.5 | [ | |||
2010 | Dry process | 820 | HNO3 | 110 | 90 | 4.2 | 31.7 | [ |
2011 | Wet process | CSA | 60 | 90.9 | 64.3 | [ | ||
2011 | Wet process | 600 | AuCl3 | 36 | 85 | 3.7 | 61.9 | [ |
2011 | Wet process | HNO3+ H2SO4 | 133 | 90 | 26.2 | [ | ||
2011 | Wet process | 198 | AuCl3 | 85 | 90 | 17.6 | 41.0 | [ |
2012 | Wet process | 198.4 | 81.8 | 9.0 | [ | |||
2012 | Wet process | H2SO4 | 100 | 90 | 34.8 | [ | ||
2013 | Wet process | HNO3+ SOCl2 | 86 | 80 | 18.6 | [ | ||
2013 | Wet process | HNO3 | 68 | 89 | 46.2 | [ | ||
2014 | Dry process | HNO3 | 160 | 90 | 21.8 | [ | ||
2014 | Dry process | 95 | 80 | 16.8 | [ | |||
2014 | Dry process (patterning) | 300 | HNO3 | 53 | 80 | 5.3 | 30.1 | [ |
2014 | Dry process | 291 | AuCl3 | 73 | 90 | 12.0 | 47.7 | [ |
2015 | Dry process | HNO3 | 63 | 90 | 55.3 | [ | ||
2015 | Wet process | 183.6 | HNO3 | 34 | 81 | 9.2 | 49.9 | [ |
2015 | Wet process | CuI | 55 | 85 | 40.5 | [ | ||
2015 | Dry process | 310 | 90 | 11.2 | [ | |||
2016 | Dry process | 950 | HNO3 | 89 | 90 | 3.7 | 39.2 | [ |
2016 | Dry process (patterning) | HNO3 | 29 | 87 | 90.1 | [ | ||
2016 | Dry process | CuCl | 98 | 90 | 35.6 | [ | ||
2017 | Dry process | CuCl2/ Cu(OH)2 | 69.4 | 90 | 50.2 | [ | ||
2017 | Dry process | 250 | HNO3 | 51 | 80 | 6.4 | 31.3 | [ |
2018 | Wet process | 310 | 90 | 11.2 | [ | |||
2018 | Dry process | 41 | HNO3 | 25 | 90 | 85.0 | 139.4 | [ |
2018 | Dry process | AuCl3 | 86 | 90 | 40.5 | [ | ||
2018 | Dry process | 195 | HNO3 | 51 | 90 | 17.9 | 68.3 | [ |
2018 | Dry process | 600 | HAuCl4 | 40 | 90 | 5.8 | 87.1 | [ |
Table 2 Representative SWCNT TCFs fabricated by wet and dry processes.
Year | Preparation method | Rs (pristine) (Ω/sq.) | Dopant | Rs (doped) (Ω/sq.) | T (%) | FoM (pristine) | FoM (doped) | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2004 | Wet process | HNO3 | 30 | 70 | 32.2 | [ | ||
2005 | Wet process | 1000 | 90 | 3.5 | [ | |||
2006 | Wet process | 300 | NO2 | 100 | 90 | 11.6 | 34.8 | [ |
2007 | Wet process | 175 | HNO3 | 70 | 80 | 9.1 | 22.8 | [ |
2007 | Dry process | 50 | 70 | 19.3 | [ | |||
2008 | Wet process | 1560 | SOCl2 | 180 | 59 | 0.4 | 3.5 | [ |
2008 | Wet process | 231 | 75 | 5.3 | [ | |||
2009 | Wet process | 110 | 80 | 14.5 | [ | |||
2009 | Wet process | HNO3+ H2SO4 or HCl | 270 | 93.5 | 20.4 | [ | ||
2010 | Wet process | 187 | 80 | 8.5 | [ | |||
2010 | Dry process | 820 | HNO3 | 110 | 90 | 4.2 | 31.7 | [ |
2011 | Wet process | CSA | 60 | 90.9 | 64.3 | [ | ||
2011 | Wet process | 600 | AuCl3 | 36 | 85 | 3.7 | 61.9 | [ |
2011 | Wet process | HNO3+ H2SO4 | 133 | 90 | 26.2 | [ | ||
2011 | Wet process | 198 | AuCl3 | 85 | 90 | 17.6 | 41.0 | [ |
2012 | Wet process | 198.4 | 81.8 | 9.0 | [ | |||
2012 | Wet process | H2SO4 | 100 | 90 | 34.8 | [ | ||
2013 | Wet process | HNO3+ SOCl2 | 86 | 80 | 18.6 | [ | ||
2013 | Wet process | HNO3 | 68 | 89 | 46.2 | [ | ||
2014 | Dry process | HNO3 | 160 | 90 | 21.8 | [ | ||
2014 | Dry process | 95 | 80 | 16.8 | [ | |||
2014 | Dry process (patterning) | 300 | HNO3 | 53 | 80 | 5.3 | 30.1 | [ |
2014 | Dry process | 291 | AuCl3 | 73 | 90 | 12.0 | 47.7 | [ |
2015 | Dry process | HNO3 | 63 | 90 | 55.3 | [ | ||
2015 | Wet process | 183.6 | HNO3 | 34 | 81 | 9.2 | 49.9 | [ |
2015 | Wet process | CuI | 55 | 85 | 40.5 | [ | ||
2015 | Dry process | 310 | 90 | 11.2 | [ | |||
2016 | Dry process | 950 | HNO3 | 89 | 90 | 3.7 | 39.2 | [ |
2016 | Dry process (patterning) | HNO3 | 29 | 87 | 90.1 | [ | ||
2016 | Dry process | CuCl | 98 | 90 | 35.6 | [ | ||
2017 | Dry process | CuCl2/ Cu(OH)2 | 69.4 | 90 | 50.2 | [ | ||
2017 | Dry process | 250 | HNO3 | 51 | 80 | 6.4 | 31.3 | [ |
2018 | Wet process | 310 | 90 | 11.2 | [ | |||
2018 | Dry process | 41 | HNO3 | 25 | 90 | 85.0 | 139.4 | [ |
2018 | Dry process | AuCl3 | 86 | 90 | 40.5 | [ | ||
2018 | Dry process | 195 | HNO3 | 51 | 90 | 17.9 | 68.3 | [ |
2018 | Dry process | 600 | HAuCl4 | 40 | 90 | 5.8 | 87.1 | [ |
Fig. 1. Representative SWCNT TCF performance since 2004 together with those of ITO TCFs on rigid and flexible substrates, as well as the performance requirements for practical applications in touch screens, LCDs, OLEDs, and PVs.
Fig. 4. Conductive atomic force microscopy results on pristine sparse SWCNT networks. (a) Current map of a bundle ~2.3-nm diameter, which overlaps an individual tube of ~1.65-nm diameter. The electrode is positioned on the top of the image (not shown). (b) Local resistance analysis through a bundle and an individual tube depicted as pathways 1 and 2 in the schematic (c). (d) Current map of interconnected tubes of different diameters showing the formation of junctions with different resistances. (e) Local resistance analyzed along an individual tube connected to a sparse configuration of nanotubes highlighted as pathways 1 and 2 in the schematic (f). The electrode is positioned on the left side of the image (not shown) [67].
Fig. 5. Mechanical properties of SWCNT TCFs. (a) Change of R for a SWCNT TCF on a polystyrene substrate fabricated by a wet process under different bending radii (strains). Inset is an optical image of the SWCNT TCF [84]. (b) Change of R for a SWCNT TCF on a poly(dimethylsiloxane) substrate fabricated by a dry process when it was subjected to repeated stretch and release cycles. (c) SEM images of SWCNT TCF under different strains in (b) [83]. (d) Structure of inverted perovskite solar cells based on SWCNT or graphene anodes on plastic substrates. (e) The power conversion efficiency (PCE) change of cells based on SWCNT, graphene, and ITO anodes under different numbers of bending cycles in (d) [49].
Fig. 6. Optical and electrical characterization of CVD, HiPCO, Laser, Arc, and CoMoCat SWCNT samples. (a) Raman spectra (the tube diameters calculated from corresponding radial breathing mode (RBM) peaks are 1.43 nm, 1.35 nm, 1.25 nm, 0.96 nm, and 0.79 nm, respectively) and (b-d) optoelectronic performance [78,85]. The abbreviations refer to SWCNTs synthesized by CVD, HiPCO, laser ablation, arc discharge, and CoMoCat methods, respectively.
Fig. 7. AFM images of CMC-dispersed SWCNTs on a silicon wafer made by (a) 10-minute sonication and (b) 60-minute sonication. (c) Length distribution measured by AFM. (d) Optoelectronic performance of CMC-dispersed SWCNTs [60]. (e) SEM and (f) AFM images of long SWCNTs [89].
Fig. 8. SWCNT film fabrication and characterization of TO and TO-TR samples. (a) Schematic of SWCNT film fabrication. TEM images of (b) TO and (c) TO-TR samples. Contact angle tests with water droplets for (d) TO and (e) TO-TR samples. (f) Optoelectronic performance of different samples [33].
Fig. 9. Conduction of SWCNT networks containing a mixture of m- and s- SWCNTs with different s-SWCNT contents. (a) Conduction mechanism in SWCNT networks versus s-SWCNT content as evaluated from absorption spectra [97]. (b) Simulated conductance of SWCNT networks versus s-SWCNT content. (c) Simulated images of conduction maps as a function of s-SWCNT content [96].
Fig. 10. Preparation and optoelectronic performance of SWCNT TCFs enriched with m-SWCNTs. (a) Picture of the monodispersed SWCNT solution and (b) corresponding absorption spectra. (c) Performance of metallic and unsorted SWCNTs [29]. (d) Etching mechanism used for enriching TCFs with m-SWCNTs. (e) Contents of m-SWCNTs synthesized using different etchant carrier gases. (f) Performance of different samples [42].
Fig. 11. Structures and optoelectronic performance of SWCNT samples. (a) AFM image of isolated SWCNTs [8]. (b) TEM image of carbon-welded isolated SWCNTs. (c) Performance of carbon-welded isolated SWCNT TCFs, other SWCNT TCFs and a reported ITO TCF [9]. SEM images for (d) Arc-I and (e) Arc-II SWCNTs. The Arc-I sample was produced using a longer sonication time and higher centrifugation speed than the Arc-II sample. (f) Performance of Arc-I and Arc-II samples [85].
Fig. 12. Junction resistance statistics of (a) X-type and (b) Y-type contacts [74]. (c) SEM image of Y-type SWNT networks. (d) TEM image of stretched SWCNTs [27]. (e) SEM image of Y-type SWCNT networks [22].
Fig. 13. Structural and electrical characterization of carbon weld. (a) Low- and (b) high-resolution TEM images of isolated SWCNTs with carbon welds. Isolated SWCNT-based FETs (c) without and (d) with carbon weld. (e, f) Ids versus Vds of devices (c) and (d), respectively. Gate voltage Vgs = -10 V [9].
Fig. 14. Effects of chemical doping on SWCNTs. (a) Water bucket model for changing the work function (Fermi level) of SWCNTs by n-doping or p-doping [114]. (b) Work function and Rs changes with increasing AuCl3 concentration. (c) Absorption spectra of SWCNTs doped by different concentrations of AuCl3. (d) Schematic of the energy band change at m- and s-SWCNTs. The leftmost diagram is the energy band before m- and s-SWCNTs contact, and its right is the energy band after m- and s-SWCNTs contact. The others are the energy band changes with increased AuCl3 doping [113].
Fig. 15. Fabrication and characterization of patterned SWCNT TCFs. (a) Schematic of the SWCNT TCF fabrication process with a microgrid. (b) Photograph of a SWCNT TCF with a microgrid. (c) Micrograph of the TCF with a microgrid with a period of 37.5 μm. (d) Optoelectronic performance of SWCNT TCFs with the microgrid for various A values of the grid [41]. (e) Magnified optical image (left) of a patterned SWCNT TCF with a 50-μm spacing and its SEM images (middle and right) [46].
|
[1] | Yueni Mei, Yuyu Li, Fuyun Li, Yaqian Li, Yingjun Jiang, Xiwei Lan, Songtao Guo, Xianluo Hu. Lithium-ion insertion kinetics of Na-doped Li2TiSiO5 as anode materials for lithium-ion batteries [J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2020, 57(0): 18-25. |
[2] | Ji-Ye Baek, Duy Le Thai, Lee Sang Yeon, Hyungtak Seo. Aluminum doping for optimization of ultrathin and high-k dielectric layer based on SrTiO3 [J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2020, 42(0): 28-37. |
[3] | Zizhan Liang, Rongchen Shen, Hau Ng Yun, Peng Zhang, Quanjun Xiang, Xin Li. A review on 2D MoS2 cocatalysts in photocatalytic H2 production [J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2020, 56(0): 89-121. |
[4] | Minhwan Ko, Sang Yeon Lee, Jucheol Park, Hyungtak Seo. Significant control of metal-insulator transition temperature through catalytic excessive oxygen doping in high-performance vanadium dioxide nanobeam channel [J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2020, 44(0): 96-101. |
[5] | Juan Du, Aibing Chen, Yue Zhang, Shuang Zong, Haixia Wu, Lei Liu. PVP-assisted preparation of nitrogen doped mesoporous carbon materials for supercapacitors [J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2020, 58(0): 197-204. |
[6] | Lei Liu, Feifei Lu, Sihao Xia, Yu Diao, Jian Tian. Improved electron capture capability of field-assisted exponential-doping GaN nanowire array photocathode [J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2020, 42(0): 54-62. |
[7] | Qianqian Liu, Quan Zhang, Lu Zhang, Wei-Lin Dai. Highly efficient single-crystalline NaNb1-XTaXO3 (X = 0.125) wires: The synergistic effect of tantalum-doping and morphology on photocatalytic hydrogen evolution [J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2020, 54(0): 20-30. |
[8] | D.P. Opra, S.V. Gnedenkov, A.A. Sokolov, A.B. Podgorbunsky, A.Yu. Ustinov, V.Yu. Mayorov, V.G. Kuryavyi, S.L. Sinebryukhov. Vanadium-doped TiO2-B/anatase mesoporous nanotubes with improved rate and cycle performance for rechargeable lithium and sodium batteries [J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2020, 54(0): 181-189. |
[9] | Myung-Sic Chae, Tae Ho Lee, Kyung Rock Son, Tae Hoon Park, Kyo Seon Hwang, Tae Geun Kim. Electrochemically metal-doped reduced graphene oxide films: Properties and applications [J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2020, 40(0): 72-80. |
[10] | Lei Liu, Feifei Lu, Jian Tian, Xingyue Zhangyang, Zhisheng Lv. High-efficient electron collection capability of graded Al compositional GaN nanowire arrays cathode [J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2020, 58(0): 86-94. |
[11] | Meigui Xu, Hainan Sun, Wei Wang, Yujuan Shen, Wei Zhou, Jun Wang, Zhi-Gang Chen, Zongping Shao. Scandium and phosphorus co-doped perovskite oxides as high-performance electrocatalysts for the oxygen reduction reaction in an alkaline solution [J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2020, 39(0): 22-27. |
[12] | Yongchun Zhang, Gang He, Wenhao Wang, Bing Yang, Chong Zhang, Yufeng Xia. Aqueous-solution-driven HfGdOx gate dielectrics for low-voltage-operated α-InGaZnO transistors and inverter circuits [J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2020, 50(0): 1-12. |
[13] | Feng Zhang, Jia Sun, Yonggang Zheng, Peng-Xiang Hou, Chang Liu, Min Cheng, Xin Li, Hui-Ming Cheng, Zhen Chen. The importance of H2 in the controlled growth of semiconducting single-wall carbon nanotubes [J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2020, 54(0): 105-111. |
[14] | Hao Liu, Xuan Ge, Qiaodan Hu, Fan Yang, Jianguo Li. A new sight into the glass forming ability caused by doping on Ba- and Ti-site in BaTi2O5 glass [J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2020, 54(0): 112-118. |
[15] | Zhaozhao Wang, Jia Li, Junjun Xu, Jinhua Huang, Ye Yang, Ruiqin Tan, Guofei Chen, Xingzhong Fang, Yue Zhao, Weijie Song. Robust ultrathin and transparent AZO/Ag-SnOx/AZO on polyimide substrate for flexible thin film heater with temperature over 400 °C [J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2020, 48(0): 156-162. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||