J. Mater. Sci. Technol. ›› 2019, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (1): 64-75.DOI: 10.1016/j.jmst.2018.09.001
• Orginal Article • Previous Articles Next Articles
Wenhua Xuab, En-Hou Hana*(), Zhenyu Wanga
Received:
2018-03-06
Revised:
2018-04-29
Accepted:
2018-05-21
Online:
2019-01-04
Published:
2019-01-15
Contact:
Han En-Hou
Wenhua Xu, En-Hou Han, Zhenyu Wang. Effect of tannic acid on corrosion behavior of carbon steel in NaCl solution[J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2019, 35(1): 64-75.
C | S | P | Si | Mn | Cr | Ni | Cu |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.150 | 0.012 | 0.024 | 0.180 | 0.440 | <0.030 | <0.030 | <0.030 |
Table 1 Composition (wt%) of Q235 carbon steel.
C | S | P | Si | Mn | Cr | Ni | Cu |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.150 | 0.012 | 0.024 | 0.180 | 0.440 | <0.030 | <0.030 | <0.030 |
Concentration (wt%) | Before immersion | After 30?h immersion |
---|---|---|
0 | 7.03?±?0.01 | 7.23?±?0.02 |
1 | 3.62?±?0.01 | 3.45?±?0.01 |
3 | 3.21?±?0.01 | 3.10?±?0.02 |
5 | 3.00?±?0.01 | 2.96?±?0.03 |
Table 2 The pH values in solutions with various tannic acid concentrations before and after 30?h immersion.
Concentration (wt%) | Before immersion | After 30?h immersion |
---|---|---|
0 | 7.03?±?0.01 | 7.23?±?0.02 |
1 | 3.62?±?0.01 | 3.45?±?0.01 |
3 | 3.21?±?0.01 | 3.10?±?0.02 |
5 | 3.00?±?0.01 | 2.96?±?0.03 |
Concentration (wt%) | Average ν (g (m2 h)) | ηw (%) |
---|---|---|
0 | 0.135?±?0.002 | - |
1 | 0.159?±?0.002 | -17.2 |
3 | 0.081?±?0.008 | 40.3 |
5 | 0.066?±?0.005 | 51.5 |
Table 3 Weight loss results in solutions with various tannic acid concentrations after 30?h immersion.
Concentration (wt%) | Average ν (g (m2 h)) | ηw (%) |
---|---|---|
0 | 0.135?±?0.002 | - |
1 | 0.159?±?0.002 | -17.2 |
3 | 0.081?±?0.008 | 40.3 |
5 | 0.066?±?0.005 | 51.5 |
Concentration (wt%) | βa (mV/dec) | βc (mV/dec) | Ecorr (mV vs. SCE) | Icorr (μA/cm2) | ν (mm/a) | ηI (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 78.9 | 248.6 | -7.38?×?102 | 15.0 | 0.174 | - |
1 | 78.3 | 286.0 | -6.23?×?102 | 17.6 | 0.204 | -17.3 |
3 | 62.3 | 199.2 | -6.16?×?102 | 8.90 | 0.110 | 40.7 |
5 | 52.7 | 234.4 | -5.87?×?102 | 7.24 | 0.097 | 51.7 |
Table 4 Corrosion parameters obtained from polarization curves for coupons in solutions with various tannic acid concentrations after 30?h immersion.
Concentration (wt%) | βa (mV/dec) | βc (mV/dec) | Ecorr (mV vs. SCE) | Icorr (μA/cm2) | ν (mm/a) | ηI (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 78.9 | 248.6 | -7.38?×?102 | 15.0 | 0.174 | - |
1 | 78.3 | 286.0 | -6.23?×?102 | 17.6 | 0.204 | -17.3 |
3 | 62.3 | 199.2 | -6.16?×?102 | 8.90 | 0.110 | 40.7 |
5 | 52.7 | 234.4 | -5.87?×?102 | 7.24 | 0.097 | 51.7 |
Fig. 6. Evolution of Nyquist plots (a, c, e, g) and Bode plots (b, d, f, h) of coupons in solutions with tannic acid concentrations of 0% (a, b), 1% (c, d), 3% (e, f) and 5% (g, h).
Fig. 7. Equivalent circuit used to fit EIS data of coupons in solutions with various tannic acid concentrations without (a) and with (b) an inductive loop.
Concentration (wt%) | Immersion time (h) | Rs (Ω cm2) | Ydl (Sn/(Ω ?cm2)) | ndl | ?max (Hz) | Cdl (F/cm2) | Rct (Ω cm2) | RL (Ω cm2) | L (H) | Chsq | ηZ (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 2 | 10.3 | 4.74?×?10-4 | 0.756 | 0.269 | 3.23?×?10-4 | 1.86?×?103 | 3.29?×?10-3 | |||
4 | 10.4 | 4.64?×?10-4 | 0.766 | 0.269 | 3.28?×?10-4 | 1.84?×?103 | 2.80?×?10-3 | ||||
6 | 10.5 | 4.98?×?10-4 | 0.767 | 0.194 | 4.91?×?10-4 | 1.82?×?103 | 3.54?×?10-3 | ||||
8 | 10.5 | 5.13?×?10-4 | 0.777 | 0.269 | 4.23?×?10-4 | 1.40?×?103 | 1.36?×?10-4 | ||||
18 | 10.5 | 4.63?×?10-4 | 0.747 | 0.269 | 4.03?×?10-4 | 1.47?×?103 | 1.82?×?10-4 | ||||
25 | 9.65 | 4.22?×?10-4 | 0.744 | 0.375 | 3.50?×?10-4 | 1.26?×?103 | 6.22?×?10-4 | ||||
30 | 9.48 | 2.98?×?10-4 | 0.766 | 0.721 | 2.90?×?10-4 | 7.63?×?102 | 2.84?×?102 | 6.74?×?102 | 1.91?×?10-3 | ||
1 | 2 | 8.73 | 2.51?×?10-4 | 0.732 | 0.999 | 2.96?×?10-4 | 5.39?×?102 | 3.82?×?102 | 1.05?×?103 | 1.02?×?10-3 | -245 |
4 | 8.74 | 2.89?×?10-4 | 0.733 | 0.999 | 2.99?×?10-4 | 5.33?×?102 | 2.76?×?102 | 7.62?×?102 | 1.22?×?10-3 | -245 | |
6 | 8.85 | 3.10?×?10-4 | 0.732 | 0.999 | 3.14?×?10-4 | 5.08?×?102 | 2.49?×?102 | 6.25?×?102 | 1.02?×?10-3 | -258 | |
8 | 9.01 | 3.10?×?10-4 | 0.734 | 0.999 | 3.18?×?10-4 | 5.01?×?102 | 2.35?×?102 | 4.94?×?102 | 1.01?×?10-3 | -179 | |
18 | 10.9 | 2.93?×?10-4 | 0.744 | 0.999 | 2.42?×?10-4 | 6.57?×?102 | 3.25?×?102 | 8.99?×?102 | 6.42?×?10-4 | -124 | |
25 | 12.0 | 3.45?×?10-4 | 0.738 | 0.999 | 2.66?×?10-4 | 5.99?×?102 | 2.38?×?102 | 5.92?×?102 | 4.64?×?10-4 | -110 | |
30 | 13.8 | 3.62?×?10-4 | 0.734 | 0.999 | 2.45?×?10-4 | 6.52?×?102 | 2.20?×?102 | 5.55?×?102 | 4.41?×?10-4 | -17.0 | |
3 | 2 | 7.82 | 9.79?×?10-5 | 0.812 | 2.70 | 7.40?×?10-5 | 7.97?×?102 | 2.10?×?102 | 5.63?×?102 | 5.62?×?10-4 | -133 |
4 | 8.08 | 5.53?×?10-5 | 0.886 | 3.76 | 4.03?×?10-5 | 1.05?×?103 | 1.64?×?102 | 2.30?×?102 | 3.88?×?10-4 | -75.2 | |
6 | 8.19 | 4.39?×?10-5 | 0.890 | 3.76 | 3.40?×?10-5 | 1.25?×?103 | 1.85?×?102 | 4.44?×?102 | 2.60?×?10-4 | -45.6 | |
8 | 8.17 | 3.95?×?10-5 | 0.901 | 2.70 | 4.04?×?10-5 | 1.46?×?103 | 1.93?×?102 | 4.90?×?102 | 2.50?×?10-4 | 4.11 | |
18 | 8.16 | 4.28?×?10-5 | 0.902 | 2.70 | 3.81?×?10-5 | 1.55?×?103 | 2.40?×?102 | 1.66?×?102 | 1.64?×?10-4 | 5.16 | |
25 | 8.09 | 4.85?×?10-5 | 0.886 | 2.70 | 4.07?×?10-5 | 1.45?×?103 | 2.41?×?102 | 1.98?×?102 | 8.78?×?10-4 | 13.1 | |
30 | 8.01 | 5.23?×?10-5 | 0.877 | 2.70 | 4.57?×?10-5 | 1.29?×?103 | 2.30?×?102 | 1.70?×?102 | 1.29?×?10-3 | 40.9 | |
5 | 2 | 10.8 | 2.36?×?10-5 | 0.904 | 5.11 | 1.76?×?10-5 | 1.77?×?103 | 2.25?×?102 | 1.32?×?103 | 3.42?×?10-4 | -5.08 |
4 | 10.8 | 2.35?×?10-5 | 0.907 | 3.76 | 2.21?×?10-5 | 1.92?×?103 | 1.44?×?102 | 1.33?×?103 | 3.13?×?10-4 | 4.17 | |
6 | 10.9 | 2.43?×?10-5 | 0.905 | 3.76 | 2.10?×?10-5 | 2.02?×?103 | 1.82?×?101 | 3.18?×?101 | 2.58?×?10-4 | 9.90 | |
8 | 10.8 | 2.54?×?10-5 | 0.901 | 3.76 | 2.07?×?10-5 | 2.04?×?103 | 1.59?×?101 | 1.23?×?101 | 2.64?×?10-4 | 31.4 | |
18 | 11.0 | 3.34?×?10-5 | 0.875 | 3.76 | 2.25?×?10-5 | 1.89?×?103 | 1.93?×?102 | 1.12?×?102 | 9.07?×?10-4 | 22.2 | |
25 | 10.5 | 4.09?×?10-5 | 0.852 | 3.76 | 2.58?×?10-5 | 1.64?×?103 | 3.05?×?102 | 1.55?×?102 | 1.41?×?10-3 | 23.2 | |
30 | 10.5 | 4.57?×?10-5 | 0.840 | 3.76 | 2.68?×?10-5 | 1.58?×?103 | 3.63?×?102 | 1.69?×?102 | 1.48?×?10-3 | 51.7 |
Table 5 Impedance data for coupons in solutions containing various tannic acid concentrations.
Concentration (wt%) | Immersion time (h) | Rs (Ω cm2) | Ydl (Sn/(Ω ?cm2)) | ndl | ?max (Hz) | Cdl (F/cm2) | Rct (Ω cm2) | RL (Ω cm2) | L (H) | Chsq | ηZ (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 2 | 10.3 | 4.74?×?10-4 | 0.756 | 0.269 | 3.23?×?10-4 | 1.86?×?103 | 3.29?×?10-3 | |||
4 | 10.4 | 4.64?×?10-4 | 0.766 | 0.269 | 3.28?×?10-4 | 1.84?×?103 | 2.80?×?10-3 | ||||
6 | 10.5 | 4.98?×?10-4 | 0.767 | 0.194 | 4.91?×?10-4 | 1.82?×?103 | 3.54?×?10-3 | ||||
8 | 10.5 | 5.13?×?10-4 | 0.777 | 0.269 | 4.23?×?10-4 | 1.40?×?103 | 1.36?×?10-4 | ||||
18 | 10.5 | 4.63?×?10-4 | 0.747 | 0.269 | 4.03?×?10-4 | 1.47?×?103 | 1.82?×?10-4 | ||||
25 | 9.65 | 4.22?×?10-4 | 0.744 | 0.375 | 3.50?×?10-4 | 1.26?×?103 | 6.22?×?10-4 | ||||
30 | 9.48 | 2.98?×?10-4 | 0.766 | 0.721 | 2.90?×?10-4 | 7.63?×?102 | 2.84?×?102 | 6.74?×?102 | 1.91?×?10-3 | ||
1 | 2 | 8.73 | 2.51?×?10-4 | 0.732 | 0.999 | 2.96?×?10-4 | 5.39?×?102 | 3.82?×?102 | 1.05?×?103 | 1.02?×?10-3 | -245 |
4 | 8.74 | 2.89?×?10-4 | 0.733 | 0.999 | 2.99?×?10-4 | 5.33?×?102 | 2.76?×?102 | 7.62?×?102 | 1.22?×?10-3 | -245 | |
6 | 8.85 | 3.10?×?10-4 | 0.732 | 0.999 | 3.14?×?10-4 | 5.08?×?102 | 2.49?×?102 | 6.25?×?102 | 1.02?×?10-3 | -258 | |
8 | 9.01 | 3.10?×?10-4 | 0.734 | 0.999 | 3.18?×?10-4 | 5.01?×?102 | 2.35?×?102 | 4.94?×?102 | 1.01?×?10-3 | -179 | |
18 | 10.9 | 2.93?×?10-4 | 0.744 | 0.999 | 2.42?×?10-4 | 6.57?×?102 | 3.25?×?102 | 8.99?×?102 | 6.42?×?10-4 | -124 | |
25 | 12.0 | 3.45?×?10-4 | 0.738 | 0.999 | 2.66?×?10-4 | 5.99?×?102 | 2.38?×?102 | 5.92?×?102 | 4.64?×?10-4 | -110 | |
30 | 13.8 | 3.62?×?10-4 | 0.734 | 0.999 | 2.45?×?10-4 | 6.52?×?102 | 2.20?×?102 | 5.55?×?102 | 4.41?×?10-4 | -17.0 | |
3 | 2 | 7.82 | 9.79?×?10-5 | 0.812 | 2.70 | 7.40?×?10-5 | 7.97?×?102 | 2.10?×?102 | 5.63?×?102 | 5.62?×?10-4 | -133 |
4 | 8.08 | 5.53?×?10-5 | 0.886 | 3.76 | 4.03?×?10-5 | 1.05?×?103 | 1.64?×?102 | 2.30?×?102 | 3.88?×?10-4 | -75.2 | |
6 | 8.19 | 4.39?×?10-5 | 0.890 | 3.76 | 3.40?×?10-5 | 1.25?×?103 | 1.85?×?102 | 4.44?×?102 | 2.60?×?10-4 | -45.6 | |
8 | 8.17 | 3.95?×?10-5 | 0.901 | 2.70 | 4.04?×?10-5 | 1.46?×?103 | 1.93?×?102 | 4.90?×?102 | 2.50?×?10-4 | 4.11 | |
18 | 8.16 | 4.28?×?10-5 | 0.902 | 2.70 | 3.81?×?10-5 | 1.55?×?103 | 2.40?×?102 | 1.66?×?102 | 1.64?×?10-4 | 5.16 | |
25 | 8.09 | 4.85?×?10-5 | 0.886 | 2.70 | 4.07?×?10-5 | 1.45?×?103 | 2.41?×?102 | 1.98?×?102 | 8.78?×?10-4 | 13.1 | |
30 | 8.01 | 5.23?×?10-5 | 0.877 | 2.70 | 4.57?×?10-5 | 1.29?×?103 | 2.30?×?102 | 1.70?×?102 | 1.29?×?10-3 | 40.9 | |
5 | 2 | 10.8 | 2.36?×?10-5 | 0.904 | 5.11 | 1.76?×?10-5 | 1.77?×?103 | 2.25?×?102 | 1.32?×?103 | 3.42?×?10-4 | -5.08 |
4 | 10.8 | 2.35?×?10-5 | 0.907 | 3.76 | 2.21?×?10-5 | 1.92?×?103 | 1.44?×?102 | 1.33?×?103 | 3.13?×?10-4 | 4.17 | |
6 | 10.9 | 2.43?×?10-5 | 0.905 | 3.76 | 2.10?×?10-5 | 2.02?×?103 | 1.82?×?101 | 3.18?×?101 | 2.58?×?10-4 | 9.90 | |
8 | 10.8 | 2.54?×?10-5 | 0.901 | 3.76 | 2.07?×?10-5 | 2.04?×?103 | 1.59?×?101 | 1.23?×?101 | 2.64?×?10-4 | 31.4 | |
18 | 11.0 | 3.34?×?10-5 | 0.875 | 3.76 | 2.25?×?10-5 | 1.89?×?103 | 1.93?×?102 | 1.12?×?102 | 9.07?×?10-4 | 22.2 | |
25 | 10.5 | 4.09?×?10-5 | 0.852 | 3.76 | 2.58?×?10-5 | 1.64?×?103 | 3.05?×?102 | 1.55?×?102 | 1.41?×?10-3 | 23.2 | |
30 | 10.5 | 4.57?×?10-5 | 0.840 | 3.76 | 2.68?×?10-5 | 1.58?×?103 | 3.63?×?102 | 1.69?×?102 | 1.48?×?10-3 | 51.7 |
Fig. 8. Variation of L (a), Cdl (b), and 1/Rp (c) with immersion time for coupons in solutions with various tannic acid concentrations (values from Table 5).
Concentration (wt%) | ηw (%) | ηI (%) | ηZ (%) |
---|---|---|---|
0 | - | - | - |
1 | -17.2 | -17.3 | -17.0 |
3 | 40.3 | 40.7 | 40.9 |
5 | 51.5 | 51.7 | 51.7 |
Table 6 Inhibitive efficiencies obtained by weight loss measurements, polarization and EIS.
Concentration (wt%) | ηw (%) | ηI (%) | ηZ (%) |
---|---|---|---|
0 | - | - | - |
1 | -17.2 | -17.3 | -17.0 |
3 | 40.3 | 40.7 | 40.9 |
5 | 51.5 | 51.7 | 51.7 |
Fig. 9. Corrosion micrographs (a, c, e, g) and current density distributions (b, d, f, h) of coupons in SVET measurements in different solutions after 8?h immersion for S0 (a, b), S1 (c, d), S2 (e, f) and S3 (g, h).
Fig. 11. XPS survey spectra with different sputtering times (a, c), elemental depth profiles (b, d), and atomic ratio of O/Fe (e) of film on coupons in S1 (a, b) and S3 (c, d).
|
[1] | Yanhua Zeng, Fenfen Yang, Zongning Chen, Enyu Guo, Minqiang Gao, Xuejian Wang, Huijun Kang, Tongmin Wang. Enhancing mechanical properties and corrosion resistance of nickel-aluminum bronze via hot rolling process [J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2021, 61(0): 186-196. |
[2] | Hu Liu, Jie Wei, Junhua Dong, Yiqing Chen, Yumin Wu, Yangtao Zhou, Subedi Dhruba Babu, Wei Ke. Influence of cementite spheroidization on relieving the micro-galvanic effect of ferrite-pearlite steel in acidic chloride environment [J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2021, 61(0): 234-246. |
[3] | Yanxin Qiao, Daokui Xu, Shuo Wang, Yingjie Ma, Jian Chen, Yuxin Wang, Huiling Zhou. Effect of hydrogen charging on microstructural evolution and corrosion behavior of Ti-4Al-2V-1Mo-1Fe alloy [J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2021, 60(0): 168-176. |
[4] | Jiawei Ding, Haitao Wang, En-Hou Han. A multiphysics model for studying transient crevice corrosion of stainless steel [J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2021, 60(0): 186-196. |
[5] | Hongxia Wan, Dongdong Song, Xiaolei Shi, Yong Cai, Tingting Li, Changfeng Chen. Corrosion behavior of Al0.4CoCu0.6NiSi0.2Ti0.25 high-entropy alloy coating via 3D printing laser cladding in a sulphur environment [J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2021, 60(0): 197-205. |
[6] | Xian-Zong Wang, Hong-Qiang Fan, Triratna Muneshwar, Ken Cadien, Jing-Li Luo. Balancing the corrosion resistance and through-plane electrical conductivity of Cr coating via oxygen plasma treatment [J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2021, 61(0): 75-84. |
[7] | Yujie Qiang, Hao Li, Xijian Lan. Self-assembling anchored film basing on two tetrazole derivatives for application to protect copper in sulfuric acid environment [J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2020, 52(0): 63-71. |
[8] | Zhongwei Wang, Yu Yan, Yang Wang, Yanjing Su, Lijie Qiao. Lifecycle of cobalt-based alloy for artificial joints: From bulk material to nanoparticles and ions due to bio-tribocorrosion [J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2020, 46(0): 98-106. |
[9] | Shidong Wang, Lyndon Lamborn, Karina Chevil, Erwin Gamboa, Weixing Chen. Near-neutral pH corrosion of mill-scaled X-65 pipeline steel with paint primer [J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2020, 49(0): 166-178. |
[10] | Yanhui Li, Siwen Wang, Xuewei Wang, Meiling Yin, Wei Zhang. New FeNiCrMo(P, C, B) high-entropy bulk metallic glasses with unusual thermal stability and corrosion resistance [J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2020, 43(0): 32-39. |
[11] | Hui Pan, Liwei Wang, Yi Lin, Feng Ge, Kang Zhao, Xin Wang, Zhongyu Cui. Mechanistic study of ammonium-induced corrosion of AZ31 magnesium alloy in sulfate solution [J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2020, 54(0): 1-13. |
[12] | Shucai Zhang, Huabing Li, Zhouhua Jiang, Zhixing Li, Jingxi Wu, Binbin Zhang, Fei Duan, Hao Feng, Hongchun Zhu. Influence of N on precipitation behavior, associated corrosion and mechanical properties of super austenitic stainless steel S32654 [J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2020, 42(0): 143-155. |
[13] | Jufeng Huang, Guang-Ling Song, Andrej Atrens, Matthew Dargusch. What activates the Mg surface—A comparison of Mg dissolution mechanisms [J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2020, 57(0): 204-220. |
[14] | Inime Ime Udoh, Hongwei Shi, Mohammad Soleymanibrojeni, Fuchun Liu, En-Hou Han. Inhibition of galvanic corrosion in Al/Cu coupling model by synergistic combination of 3-Amino-1,2,4-triazole-5-thiol and cerium chloride [J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2020, 44(0): 102-115. |
[15] | Yanan Pu, Wenwen Dou, Tingyue Gu, Shiya Tang, Xiaomei Han, Shougang Chen. Microbiologically influenced corrosion of Cu by nitrate reducing marine bacterium Pseudomonas aeruginosa [J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2020, 47(0): 10-19. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||