J. Mater. Sci. Technol. ›› 2022, Vol. 111: 189-203.DOI: 10.1016/j.jmst.2021.08.088
• Research Article • Previous Articles Next Articles
Sheng Weia,b,1, Jiaxi Liua,1, Yongpeng Xiaa,1, Huanzhi Zhanga, Riguang Chenga, Lixian Suna,b,*, Fen Xua,*, Pengru Huanga, Federico Roseic, Aleskey A. Pimerzind, Hans Jüergen Seiferte, Hongge Panf
Received:2021-07-21
Revised:2021-08-21
Accepted:2021-08-22
Published:2022-06-10
Online:2021-11-26
Contact:
Lixian Sun,Fen Xu
About author:* Guilin University of Electronic Technology, China.1The authors contributed equally to this work.
Sheng Wei, Jiaxi Liu, Yongpeng Xia, Huanzhi Zhang, Riguang Cheng, Lixian Sun, Fen Xu, Pengru Huang, Federico Rosei, Aleskey A. Pimerzin, Hans Jüergen Seifert, Hongge Pan. Remarkable catalysis of spinel ferrite XFe2O4 (X = Ni, Co, Mn, Cu, Zn) nanoparticles on the dehydrogenation properties of LiAlH4: An experimental and theoretical study[J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2022, 111: 189-203.
| Sample | Peak positions (cm-1) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T2g (1) (F2g (1)) | Eg | T2g (2) (F2g (2)) | T2g (3) (F2g (3)) | A1g | |
| NiFe2O4 | 206 | 280 | 463 | 542 | 674 |
| CoFe2O4 | 188 | 284 | 456 | 597 | 672 |
| MnFe2O4 | 213 | 268 | 376 | 487 | 583 |
| CuFe2O4 | 220 | 285 | 400 | 493 | 604 |
| ZnFe2O4 | 215 | 278 | 389 | 484 | 590 |
| Fe3O4 | 215 | 277 | 391 | 491 | 592 |
Table 1. Raman study of XFe2O4 (X = Ni, Co, Mn, Cu, Zn, Fe) nanoparticles.
| Sample | Peak positions (cm-1) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T2g (1) (F2g (1)) | Eg | T2g (2) (F2g (2)) | T2g (3) (F2g (3)) | A1g | |
| NiFe2O4 | 206 | 280 | 463 | 542 | 674 |
| CoFe2O4 | 188 | 284 | 456 | 597 | 672 |
| MnFe2O4 | 213 | 268 | 376 | 487 | 583 |
| CuFe2O4 | 220 | 285 | 400 | 493 | 604 |
| ZnFe2O4 | 215 | 278 | 389 | 484 | 590 |
| Fe3O4 | 215 | 277 | 391 | 491 | 592 |
| Sample | ions | Binding Energy (eV) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2p1/2 (tetrahedral sites) | 2p1/2 (octahedral sites) | 2p3/2 (tetrahedral sites) | 2p3/2 (octahedral sites) | Satellite peak | ||
| NiFe2O4 | Ni2+ | 877.1 | 872.3 | 855.1 | 853.4 | 881.2 860.9 |
| Fe3+ | 726.6 | 723.7 | 713.2 | 710.4 | 732.5 718.5 | |
| CoFe2O4 | Co2+ | 795.8 | 792.9 | 781.3 | 778.0 | 801.3 786.6 |
| Fe3+ | 726.2 | 722.3 | 711.2 | 708.6 | 732.3 717.1 | |
| MnFe2O4 | Mn2+ | 653.4 | 652.1 | 642.2 | 640.6 | 659.4 645.9 |
| Fe3+ | 727.1 | 724.0 | 712.8 | 710.3 | 732.1 719.1 | |
| CuFe2O4 | Cu2+ | 955.3 | 953.6 | 935.1 | 933.3 | 963.1 959.6 943.8 940.5 |
| Fe3+ | 727.4 | 724.0 | 713.4 | 710.5 | 733.5 719.0 | |
| ZnFe2O4 | Zn2+ | 1044.8 | 1021.6 | |||
| Fe3+ | 727.1 | 724.0 | 712.8 | 710.3 | 732.1 719.1 | |
| Fe3O4 | Fe2+ | 723.4 | 709.5 | 732.3 716.4 | ||
| Fe3+ | 728.1 | 725.1 | 712.8 | 710.9 | 735.4 719.3 | |
Table 2. XPS study of XFe2O4 (X = Ni, Co, Mn, Cu, Zn, Fe) nanoparticles.
| Sample | ions | Binding Energy (eV) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2p1/2 (tetrahedral sites) | 2p1/2 (octahedral sites) | 2p3/2 (tetrahedral sites) | 2p3/2 (octahedral sites) | Satellite peak | ||
| NiFe2O4 | Ni2+ | 877.1 | 872.3 | 855.1 | 853.4 | 881.2 860.9 |
| Fe3+ | 726.6 | 723.7 | 713.2 | 710.4 | 732.5 718.5 | |
| CoFe2O4 | Co2+ | 795.8 | 792.9 | 781.3 | 778.0 | 801.3 786.6 |
| Fe3+ | 726.2 | 722.3 | 711.2 | 708.6 | 732.3 717.1 | |
| MnFe2O4 | Mn2+ | 653.4 | 652.1 | 642.2 | 640.6 | 659.4 645.9 |
| Fe3+ | 727.1 | 724.0 | 712.8 | 710.3 | 732.1 719.1 | |
| CuFe2O4 | Cu2+ | 955.3 | 953.6 | 935.1 | 933.3 | 963.1 959.6 943.8 940.5 |
| Fe3+ | 727.4 | 724.0 | 713.4 | 710.5 | 733.5 719.0 | |
| ZnFe2O4 | Zn2+ | 1044.8 | 1021.6 | |||
| Fe3+ | 727.1 | 724.0 | 712.8 | 710.3 | 732.1 719.1 | |
| Fe3O4 | Fe2+ | 723.4 | 709.5 | 732.3 716.4 | ||
| Fe3+ | 728.1 | 725.1 | 712.8 | 710.9 | 735.4 719.3 | |
Fig. 6. TG patterns (a, b) of the LiAlH4 (As-received), LiAlH4 (Ball milling), LiAlH4+7 wt% XFe2O4 (X = Ni, Co, Mn, Cu, Zn, Fe), LiAlH4+x wt% NiFe2O4 (x = 1, 3, 7, 10), DSC thermograms (c, d) of the LiAlH4 and LiAlH4+7 wt% NiFe2O4, and the corresponding Kissinger's plots (e, f), Isothermal dehydrogenation curves (g) of the LiAlH4 (As-received) and LiAlH4+7 wt% NiFe2O4, Isothermal rehydrogenation curves (h) of the LiAlH4 (As-received) and LiAlH4+7 wt% NiFe2O4.
| System | Onset desorption temperature ( °C) | Activation energy (kJ mol-1) | H2 desorption capacity (wt%) | Refs. | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Step 1 | Step 2 | Step 1 | Step 2 | |||
| LiAlH4-Fe2O3 | 80.0 | 145.0 | 84.00 | 96.00 | 7.60 | [ |
| LiAlH4-LaFeO3 | 109.0 | 153.0 | 73.00 | 89.00 | 6.40 | [ |
| LiAlH4-Li2TiO3 | 75.0 | 137.0 | 72.60 | 71.40 | ∼5.10 | [ |
| LiAlH4-BaFe12O19 | 95.0 | ∼160.0 | 71.00 | 90.00 | ∼6.00 | [ |
| LiAlH4-MgFe2O4 | 95.0 | 145.0 | 73.00 | 97.00 | 6.50 | [ |
| LiAlH4-NiCo2O4@Rgo | 62.7 | ∼150.0 | 77.56 | 91.45 | 6.28 | [ |
| LiAlH4-NiFe2O4 | 69.1 | 129.4 | 42.32 | 71.42 | 7.29 | This work |
Table 3. A comparison of onset desorption temperatures, activation energies and H2 desorption capacity of some metal oxides doped-LiAlH4 systems.
| System | Onset desorption temperature ( °C) | Activation energy (kJ mol-1) | H2 desorption capacity (wt%) | Refs. | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Step 1 | Step 2 | Step 1 | Step 2 | |||
| LiAlH4-Fe2O3 | 80.0 | 145.0 | 84.00 | 96.00 | 7.60 | [ |
| LiAlH4-LaFeO3 | 109.0 | 153.0 | 73.00 | 89.00 | 6.40 | [ |
| LiAlH4-Li2TiO3 | 75.0 | 137.0 | 72.60 | 71.40 | ∼5.10 | [ |
| LiAlH4-BaFe12O19 | 95.0 | ∼160.0 | 71.00 | 90.00 | ∼6.00 | [ |
| LiAlH4-MgFe2O4 | 95.0 | 145.0 | 73.00 | 97.00 | 6.50 | [ |
| LiAlH4-NiCo2O4@Rgo | 62.7 | ∼150.0 | 77.56 | 91.45 | 6.28 | [ |
| LiAlH4-NiFe2O4 | 69.1 | 129.4 | 42.32 | 71.42 | 7.29 | This work |
Fig. 7. XRD patterns (a-d) and FT-IR (e-h) of the LiAlH4 (As-received), LiAlH4 (Ball milling), LiAlH4+x wt% NiFe2O4 (x = 1, 3, 7, 10), LiAlH4+7 wt% NiFe2O4 after isothermal dehydrogenation (90 °C, 120 °C, 150 °C, 180 °C), LiAlH4+7 wt% XFe2O4 (X = Ni, Co, Mn, Cu, Zn, Fe), LiAlH4+7 wt% NiFe2O4 before and after isothermal rehydrogenation.
Fig. 8. SEM images of the (a) as-received LiAlH4, (b) ball milled LiAlH4, LiAlH4+7 wt% NiFe2O4 before (c, d) and after (i-l) dehydrogenation (90 °C, 120 °C, 150 °C, 180 °C), EDS mapping of the LiAlH4+7 wt% NiFe2O4 at different states: (e-h) after ball-milling.
| Empty Cell | LiAlH4 | LiAlH4@NiFe2O4 | LiAlH4@Al4Ni3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Atom | Atomic charge (e-) | ||
| Al | -2.11 | -2.22 | -2.06 |
| H1 | 0.53 | 0.72 | 0.76 |
| H2 | 0.53 | 0.31 | 0.85 |
| H3 | 0.53 | 0.31 | 0.42 |
| H4 | 0.53 | 0.57 | 0.67 |
| Bond | Bond length(Å) | ||
| Al-H1 | 1.65 | 1.63 | 1.66 |
| Al-H2 | 1.65 | 1.87 | 1.76 |
| Al-H3 | 1.65 | 1.88 | 1.86 |
| Al-H4 | 1.65 | 1.61 | 1.59 |
| Adsorption energy (eV) | -4.15 | -3.93 |
Table 4. Atomic charge, bond length, and adsorption energy for LiAlH4, LiAlH4@NiFe2O4 and LiAlH4@Al4Ni3.
| Empty Cell | LiAlH4 | LiAlH4@NiFe2O4 | LiAlH4@Al4Ni3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Atom | Atomic charge (e-) | ||
| Al | -2.11 | -2.22 | -2.06 |
| H1 | 0.53 | 0.72 | 0.76 |
| H2 | 0.53 | 0.31 | 0.85 |
| H3 | 0.53 | 0.31 | 0.42 |
| H4 | 0.53 | 0.57 | 0.67 |
| Bond | Bond length(Å) | ||
| Al-H1 | 1.65 | 1.63 | 1.66 |
| Al-H2 | 1.65 | 1.87 | 1.76 |
| Al-H3 | 1.65 | 1.88 | 1.86 |
| Al-H4 | 1.65 | 1.61 | 1.59 |
| Adsorption energy (eV) | -4.15 | -3.93 |
Fig. 10. Adsorption structures and charge density difference with an isovalue of 0.004 e Å-3 for LiAlH4 clusters on NiFe2O4 (a) and Al4Ni3 (b). Density of states (DOS) for LiAlH4, LiAlH4@NiFe2O4, and LiAlH4@Al4Ni3. The dashed line indicates the Fermi level.
| [1] |
X.B. Yu, Z.W. Tang, D.L. Sun, L.Z. Ouyang, M. Zhu, Prog. Mater. Sci. 88 (2017) 1-48.
DOI URL |
| [2] |
Q.G. Zhu, D.X. Yang, H.Z. Liu, X.F. Sun, C.J. Chen, J.H. Bi, J.Y. Liu, H.H. Wu, B.X. Han, Angew. Chem.-Int. Edit. 59 (2020) 8896-8901.
DOI URL |
| [3] | J.J. Liu, S. Zhu, X.Y. Chen, J. Xu, L. Zhang, K. Yan, W. Chen, H.H. Cheng, S.M. Han, J. Mater. Sci.Technol. 80 (2021) 128-138. |
| [4] | L. Yang, R.M. Liu, L.F. Jiao, Adv.Funct. Mater. 30 (2020) 1909618. |
| [5] |
C. Liang, Y. Chen, M. Wu, K. Wang, W.K. Zhang, Y.P. Gan, H. Huang, J. Chen, Y. Xia, J. Zhang, S.Y. Zheng, H.G. Pan, Nat. Commun. 12 (2021) 119.
DOI PMID |
| [6] | X. Huang, X.Z. Xiao, X.C. Wang, Z.D. Yao, C.T. Wang, X.L. Fan, L.X. Chen, Energy Storage Mater 13 (2018) 199-206. |
| [7] | K.C. Pan, L. Zhang, W.W. Qian, X.K. Wu, K. Dong, H.T. Zhang, S.J. Zhang, Adv.Mater. 32 (2020) 2000399. |
| [8] |
Y.Q. Yang, L.C. Yin, Y. Gong, P. Niu, J.Q. Wang, L. Gu, X.Q. Chen, G. Liu, L.Z. Wang, H.M. Cheng, Adv. Mater. 30 (2018) 1704479.
DOI URL |
| [9] | C.Y. Yuan, W. Chen, Z.X. Yang, Z.G. Huang, X.B. Yu, J. Mater. Sci.Technol. 73 (2021) 186-192. |
| [10] | W. Chen, L. You, G.L. Xia, X.B. Yu, J. Mater. Sci.Technol. 79 (2021) 205-211. |
| [11] | H.W. Zhang, X.Y. Zheng, X. Tian, Y. Liu, X.G. Li, Prog. Nat. Sci. 27 (2017) 56-63. |
| [12] |
L.Z. Ouyang, W. Chen, J.W. Liu, M. Felderhoff, H. Wang, M. Zhu, Adv. Energy Mater. 7 (2017) 1700299.
DOI URL |
| [13] |
Y.J. Zhong, H.B. Dai, M. Zhu, P. Wang, Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 41 (2016) 11042-11049.
DOI URL |
| [14] |
K.C. Xian, B. Nie, Z.G. Li, M.X. Gao, Z.L. Li, C.X. Shang, Y.F. Liu, Z.X. Guo, H.G. Pan, Chem. Eng. J. 407 (2021) 127156.
DOI URL |
| [15] |
Y.Y. Zhu, L.Z. Ouyang, H. Zhong, J.W. Liu, H. Wang, H.Y. Shao, Z.G. Huang, M. Zhu, Angew. Chem.-Int. Edit. 59 (2020) 8623-8629.
DOI URL |
| [16] |
X. Zhang, Y.F. Liu, Z.H. Ren, X.L. Zhang, J.J. Hu, Z.G. Huang, Y.H. Lu, M.X. Gao, H.G. Pan, Energy Environ. Sci. 14 (2021) 2302-2313.
DOI URL |
| [17] |
N.A. Sazelee, M. Ismail, Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 46 (2021) 9123-9141.
DOI URL |
| [18] |
Z.L. Li, P. Li, Q. Wan, F.Q. Zhai, Z.W. Liu, K.F. Zhao, L. Wang, S.Y. Lu, L. Zou, X.H. Qu, A.A. Volinsky, J. Phys. Chem. C 117 (2013) 18343-18352.
DOI URL |
| [19] |
N.A. Ali, N.H. Idris, N.A. Sazelee, M.S. Yahya, F.a.H. Yap, M. Ismail,Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 44 (2019) 28227-28234.
DOI URL |
| [20] |
P. Li, Z.L. Li, F.Q. Zhai, Q. Wan, X.Q. Li, X.H. Qu, A.A. Volinsky, J. Phys. Chem. C 117 (2013) 25917-25925.
DOI URL |
| [21] |
C. Wei, Z.X. Feng, M. Baisariyev, L.H. Yu, L. Zeng, T.P. Wu, H.Y. Zhao, Y.Q. Huang, M.J. Bedzyk, T. Sritharan, Z.C.J. Xu, Chem. Mat. 28 (2016) 4129-4133.
DOI URL |
| [22] |
A.H. Monfared, A. Zamanian, M. Beygzadeh, I. Sharifi, M. Mozafari, J. Alloys Compd. 693 (2017) 1090-1095.
DOI URL |
| [23] |
S. Tashakor, M.R. Noorbala, M. Namazian, Theor. Chem. Acc. 136 (2017) 118.
DOI URL |
| [24] |
A. Salehabadi, M.I. Ahmad, N. Morad, M. Salavati-Niasari, M. Enhessari, J. Alloys Compd. 790 (2019) 884-890.
DOI URL |
| [25] |
G. Kresse, D. Joubert, Phys. Rev. B 59 (1999) 1758-1775.
DOI URL |
| [26] |
G. Kresse, J. F.urthmuller, Comput. Mater. Sci. 6 (1996) 15-50.
DOI URL |
| [27] |
G. Kresse, J. Furthmuller, Phys. Rev. B 54 (1996) 11169-11186.
DOI PMID |
| [28] |
J.P. Perdew, K. Burke, M. Ernzerhof, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 (1996) 3865-3868.
DOI PMID |
| [29] | Q. Zhao, Z.H. Yan, C.C. Chen, J. Chen, Chem. Rev. 117 (2017) 10121-10211. |
| [30] |
A. Ahlawat, V.G. Sathe, J. Raman Spectrosc. 42 (2011) 1087-1094.
DOI URL |
| [31] |
P. Chandramohan, M.P. Srinivasan, S. Velmurugan, S.V. Narasimhan, J. Solid State Chem. 184 (2011) 89-96.
DOI URL |
| [32] |
Z.Z. Lazarevic, C. Jovalekic, A. Milutinovic, M.J. Romcevic, N.Z. Romcevic, Acta Phys. Pol. A 121 (2012) 682-686.
DOI URL |
| [33] |
R.S. Yadav, J. Havlica, J. Masilko, L. Kalina, J. Wasserbauer, M. Hajduchova, V. Enev, I. Kuritka, Z. Kozakova, J. Supercond, Nov. Magn 29 (2016) 759-769.
DOI URL |
| [34] |
P. Dolcet, K. Kirchberg, A. Antonello, C. Suchomski, R. Marschall, S. Diodati, R. Munoz-Espi, K. Landfester, S. Gross, Inorg. Chem. Front. 6 (2019) 1527-1534.
DOI |
| [35] |
O.N. Shebanova, P. Lazor, J. Raman Spectrosc. 34 (2003) 845-852.
DOI URL |
| [36] | P. Sivakumar, R. Ramesh, A. Ramanand, S. Ponnusamy. C. Muthamizhchelvan, Appl. Surf. Sci. 258 (2012) 6648-6652. |
| [37] |
S.V. Bhosale, P.S. Ekambe, S.V. Bhoraskar, V.L. Mathe, Appl. Surf. Sci. 441 (2018) 724-733.
DOI URL |
| [38] |
Y. Kumar, A. Sharma, P.M. Shirage, J. Alloys Compd. 778 (2019) 398-409.
DOI URL |
| [39] |
K.H. Liew, M. Rocha, C. Pereira, A.L. Pires, A.M. Pereira, M.A. Yarmo, J.C. Juan, R.M. Yusop, A.F. Peixoto, C. Freire, ChemCatChem 9 (2017) 3930-3941.
DOI URL |
| [40] |
L.K. Wu, H. Wu, H.B. Zhang, H.Z. Cao, G.Y. Hou, Y.P. Tang, G.Q. Zheng, Chem. Eng. J. 334 (2018) 1808-1819.
DOI URL |
| [41] |
X.F. She, Z. Zhang, Nanoscale Res. Lett. 12 (2017) 211.
DOI URL |
| [42] |
C. Torres-Sanchez, M.H. Abyaneh, J.A. Holt, B.C. Mee, J. Wang, P.P. Conway, Compos. Interfaces 28 (2021) 309-328.
DOI URL |
| [43] |
M. Islam, G. Ali, M.G. Jeong, W. Choi, K.Y. Chung, H.G. Jung, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9 (2017) 14833-14843.
DOI URL |
| [44] | M. Ismail, A.M. Sinin, C.K. Sheng, W.B.W. Nik, Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 9 (2014) 4959-4973. |
| [45] |
N.A. Sazelee, M.S. Yahya, N.H. Idris, M.F.M. Din, M. Ismail, Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 44 (2019) 11953-11960.
DOI URL |
| [46] |
T.F. Zhang, S. Isobe, Y.M. Wang, C.M. Liu, N. Hashimoto, K. Takahashi, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 18 (2016) 27623-27629.
DOI URL |
| [47] | N.A. Sazelee, M.S. Yahya, N.A. Ali, N.H. Idris, M. Ismail, J. Alloys Compd. 835 (2020) 7. |
| [48] |
Y.P. Xia, S. Wei, Q. Huang, J.Q. Li, X.H. Cen, H.Z. Zhang, H.L. Chu, L.X. Sun, F. Xu, P.R. Huang, Inorg. Chem. Front. 7 (2020) 1257-1272.
DOI URL |
| [49] |
D. RafiUd, Z. Lin, P. Li, X.H. Qu, J. Alloys Compd. 508 (2010) 119-128.
DOI URL |
| [50] |
Z.L. Li, F.Q. Zhai, Q. Wan, Z.J. Liu, J.W. Shan, P. Li, A.A. Volinsky, X.H. Qu, RSC Adv. 4 (2014) 18989-18997.
DOI URL |
| [51] |
F.Q. Zhai, P. Li, A.Z. Sun, S. Wu, Q. Wan, W.N. Zhang, Y.L. Li, L.Q. Cui, X.H. Qu, J. Phys. Chem. C 116 (2012) 11939-11945.
DOI URL |
| [52] |
L. Wang, A. Rawal, M.Z. Quadir, K.F. Aguey-Zinsou, Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 42 (2017) 14144-14153.
DOI URL |
| [53] |
Y.R. Zhao, M. Han, H.X. Wang, C.C. Chen, J. Chen, Inorg. Chem. Front. 3 (2016) 1536-1542.
DOI URL |
| [54] |
R.J. Xiong, G. Sang, G.H. Zhang, X.Y. Yan, P.L. Li, Y. Yao, D.L. Luo, C.A. Chen, T. Tang, Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 42 (2017) 6088-6095.
DOI URL |
| [55] |
Q. Peng, G. Chen, L.J. Kang, H. Mizuseki, Y. Kawazoe, Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 36 (2011) 12742-12752.
DOI URL |
| [56] |
H. Yao, S. Isobe, Y.M. Wang, N. Hashimoto, S. Ohnuki, Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 38 (2013) 3689-3694.
DOI URL |
| [57] |
X.D. Zhao, Z.N. Ma, D.H. Wu, X. Zhang, Y. Jing, Z. Zhou, Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 40 (2015) 8897-8902.
DOI URL |
| [58] | Y. Xia, H. Zhang, Y. Sun, L. Sun, F. Xu, S. Sun, G. Zhang, P. Huang, Y. Du, J. Wang, S.P. Verevkin, A.A. Pimerzin, Mater. Today Nano 8 (2019) 100054. |
| [1] | Wei Chen, Lei You, Guanglin Xia, Xuebin Yu. A balance between catalysis and nanoconfinement towards enhanced hydrogen storage performance of NaAlH4 [J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2021, 79(0): 205-211. |
| [2] | Won-Seok Ko, Ki Beom Park, Hyung-Ki Park. Density functional theory study on the role of ternary alloying elements in TiFe-based hydrogen storage alloys [J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2021, 92(0): 148-158. |
| [3] | Jingjing Liu, Shuai Zhu, Xiangyu Chen, Jie Xu, Lu Zhang, Kai Yan, Wei Chen, Honghui Cheng, Shumin Han. Superior electrochemical performance of La-Mg-Ni-based alloys with novel A2B7-A7B23 biphase superlattice structure [J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2021, 80(0): 128-138. |
| [4] | Hui Yong, Shihai Guo, Zeming Yuan, Yan Qi, Dongliang Zhao, Yanghuan Zhang. Phase transformation, thermodynamics and kinetics property of Mg90Ce5RE5 (RE = La, Ce, Nd) hydrogen storage alloys [J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2020, 51(0): 84-93. |
| [5] | Yanghuan Zhang, Pengpeng Wang, Zhonghui Hou, Zeming Yuan, Yan Qi, Shihai Guo. Structure and hydrogen storage characteristics of as-spun Mg-Y-Ni-Cu alloys [J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2019, 35(8): 1727-1734. |
| [6] | Zeming Yuan, Bangwen Zhang, Yanghuan Zhang, Shihai Guo, Xiaoping Dong, Dongliang Zhao. A comparison study of hydrogen storage properties of as-milled Sm5Mg41 alloy catalyzed by CoS2 and MoS2 nano-particles [J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2018, 34(10): 1851-1858. |
| [7] | Yanghuan Zhang, Baowei Li, Huiping Ren, Tai Yang, Shihai Guo, Yan Qi, Dongliang Zhao. Hydrogen Storage Kinetics of Nanocrystalline and Amorphous LaMg12-Type Alloy-Ni Composites Synthesized by Mechanical Milling [J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2016, 32(3): 218-225. |
| [8] | Yanghuan Zhang, Tingting Zhai, Baowei Li, Huiping Ren, Wengang Bu, Dongliang Zhao. Highly Improved Gaseous Hydrogen Storage Characteristics of the Nanocrystalline and Amorphous Nd-Cu-added Mg2Ni-type Alloys by Melt Spinning [J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2014, 30(10): 1020-1026. |
| [9] | Baogang Yang, Songlin Li, Hang Wang, Jintao Xiang, Qiumin Yang. Effect of MWCNTs Additive on Desorption Properties of Zn(BH4)2 Composite Prepared by Mechanical Alloying [J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2013, 29(8): 715-719. |
| [10] | N.A. Niaz, I. Ahmad, Waheed S. Khan, S. Tajammul Hussain. Synthesis of Nanostructured Mg−Ni Alloy and Its Hydrogen Storage Properties [J]. J Mater Sci Technol, 2012, 28(5): 401-406. |
| [11] | Sai Li, Xiaodong Yang, Haiyan Zhu, Yan Liu, Yongning Liu. Hydrogen Storage Alloy and Carbon Nanotubes Mixed Catalyst in a Direct Borohydride Fuel Cell [J]. J Mater Sci Technol, 2011, 27(12): 1089-1093. |
| [12] | Lianbang Wang Guobin Wu Zhenzhen Yang Yunfang Gao Xinbiao Mao Chun'an May. Electrochemical Characteristics of LaNi4.5Al0.5 Alloy Used as Anodic Catalyst in a Direct Borohydride Fuel Cell [J]. J Mater Sci Technol, 2011, 27(1): 46-50. |
| [13] | Zhongmin WANG, Huaiying ZHOU, R.P.ZOU, Zhengfei GU. Characterization and Electrode Properties of Mg-Ni-RE Compounds for Hydrogen Storage [J]. J Mater Sci Technol, 2005, 21(Supl.1): 119-122. |
| [14] | Lianbang WANG, Chunan MA, Xinbiao MAO, Yuanming SUN, Seijiro SUDA. AB5-type Hydrogen Storage Alloy Modified with Ti/Zr Used as Anodic Materials in Borohydride Fuel Cell [J]. J Mater Sci Technol, 2005, 21(06): 831-835. |
| [15] | Zhiqing YUAN, Guanglie LU, Bin LIAO, Yongquan LEI. Geometric Effects of La1+xMg2-xNi9 (x=0.02~1.0) Ternary Alloys on Their Hydrogen Storage Capacities [J]. J Mater Sci Technol, 2005, 21(02): 231-233. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||
WeChat
