J. Mater. Sci. Technol. ›› 2024, Vol. 197: 25-31.DOI: 10.1016/j.jmst.2024.01.056

Special Issue: Films and coatings 2024 Metallic glass 2024 Nuclear materials 2024

• Letter • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Size effect of amorphous layers on radiation resistance in Cu/Nb multilayers

Zhe Yana,1, Wenfan Yangb,1, Jingyu Pangb, Jiahao Yaoc, Jian Zhangd, Lixin Yangb, Shijian Zhenga,*, Jian Wange, Xiuliang Mab,f,g   

  1. aTianjin Key Laboratory of Materials Laminating Fabrication and Interface Control Technology, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300130, China;
    bShenyang National Laboratory for Materials Science, Institute of Metal Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China;
    cBeijing Institute of Technology Chongqing Innovation Center, Chongqing 401120, China;
    dSchool of Energy Research, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China;
    eMechanical and Materials Engineering, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588, USA;
    fBay Area Center for Electron Microscopy, Songshan Lake Materials Laboratory, Dongguan 523808, China;
    gInstitute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
  • Received:2023-08-02 Revised:2023-12-14 Accepted:2024-01-11 Published:2024-10-20 Online:2024-10-15
  • Contact: *E-mail address: sjzheng@hebut.edu.cn (S. Zheng)
  • About author:1 These two authors contributed equally to this paper.

Abstract: Utilizing multilayer engineering to connect crystalline and amorphous can not only improve the mechanical properties but also enhance the radiation resistance of multilayers. However, the non-monotonic dependence of radiation resistance on the amorphous thickness necessitates an in-depth investigation into the size effect of the amorphous layer. Taking the Cu-Nb system as the prototype, we reveal the radiation resistance of Cu/Nb multilayers with varying thicknesses of the CuNb amorphous layer. After irradiation, multilayers with 0, 0.8, and 2 nm amorphous show flat or non-flat interface structures due to distinct crystalline growth processes during amorphous crystallization. Notably, multilayers with 0.8 nm amorphous exhibit the optimal radiation response, because the ultra-thin amorphous layer shows better thermal stability and slower crystallization rate that can annihilate more radiation defects and effectively inhibit defects growth. Furthermore, a quantitative analysis elucidates the reasons for hardness changes, which are attributed to amorphous crystallization, dislocation nucleation-induced softening, and radiation defects-induced hardening.

Key words: Multilayers, Interface, Amorphous, Radiation resistance, Size effect