3D-printed surface promoting osteogenic differentiation and angiogenetic factor expression of BMSCs on Ti6Al4V implants and early osseointegration in vivo

doi:10.1016/j.jmst.2018.09.063

材料科学与技术 ›› 2019, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (2): 336-343.DOI: 10.1016/j.jmst.2018.09.063

收稿日期:2018-02-09 修回日期:2018-04-04 接受日期:2018-06-08 出版日期:2019-02-05 发布日期:2018-12-21

3D-printed surface promoting osteogenic differentiation and angiogenetic factor expression of BMSCs on Ti6Al4V implants and early osseointegration in vivo

Jinkai Zhang^a^b, Wenhui Zhou^a^b, Hui Wang^b, Kaili Lin^b^c^*(), Fengshan Chen^a^b^*()

^aDepartment of Orthodontics, School & Hospital of Stomatology, Tongji University, Shanghai 200072, China
^bShanghai Engineering Research Center of Tooth Restoration and Regeneration, Shanghai 200072, China
^cDepartment of Oral & Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Shanghai Research Institute of Stomatology, Shanghai 200011, China

Received:2018-02-09 Revised:2018-04-04 Accepted:2018-06-08 Online:2019-02-05 Published:2018-12-21
Contact: Lin Kaili,Chen Fengshan
About author:
These authors contributed equally to this work.

摘要/Abstract

Abstract:

Three-dimensional-printed (3D-P) titanium implants display many advantages, such as design flexibility, higher efficiency, the capability to easily construct complex or customized structures, etc., and is believed to potentially replace traditional implants. However, the biological performance of the 3D-P titanium surface has not been investigated systematically. Herein, we analyzed the surface characteristics of 3D-P Ti6Al4V implants and evaluated the biological responses of bone marrow derived mesenchymal stromal cells (BMSCs) to the 3D-P surface in vitro. Moreover, after implantation into the rat femoral condyle for 3 and 6 weeks, the osseointegration performance was evaluated. The results showed the 3D-P Ti6Al4V implant presented distinct fluctuant macroscale rough surface and relatively better hydrophilicity which enhanced the adhesion, proliferation, osteogenic differentiation and angiogenetic factor expression of BMSCs. Moreover, the in vivo osseointegration performance was also better than that of the control group at the early stage. The present study suggested the 3D-P titanium alloy is a promising candidate to be used as implant material.

Key words: Three-dimensional printing, Titanium alloy, BMSCs, Osteogenesis, Osseointegration

. [J]. 材料科学与技术, 2019, 35(2): 336-343.

Jinkai Zhang, Wenhui Zhou, Hui Wang, Kaili Lin, Fengshan Chen. 3D-printed surface promoting osteogenic differentiation and angiogenetic factor expression of BMSCs on Ti6Al4V implants and early osseointegration in vivo[J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2019, 35(2): 336-343.

图/表 9

Fig. 1. SEM images of the control (a) and 3D-P (b) surface morphology (scale bar: 20 μm).

Fig. 2. Three-dimensional images of the control (a) and 3D-P surface (b) captured by the 3D measuring laser microscope and quantitative surface roughness parameters. *P < 0.05 compared to control group.

Fig. 3. Water contact angle of the control and 3D-P surface. *P < 0.05 compared to control group.

Fig. 4. SEM observation of BMSCs on the control and 3D-P surface after 1 and 3 days of culture (scale bar: 20 μm).

Fig. 5. Proliferation of BMSCs on the control and 3D-P surface detected by CCK-8 assay after culturing for 1, 4, 7 and 10 days. *P < 0.05 compared to control group.

Fig. 6. ALP activity of BMSCs cultured for 4 and 7 days on the control and 3D-P surfaces. *P < 0.05 compared to control group.

Fig. 7. Relative gene expression of BMSCs cultured on the control and 3D-P surfaces for 7 and 10 days. *P < 0.05 compared to control group.

Fig. 8. The Alizarin red staining and quantification of extracellular matrix mineralization of BMSCs on the control and 3D-P surfaces after culturing for 21 days. *P < 0.05 compared to control group.

Fig. 9. Histological images of the undecalcified sections and histomorphometric analysis of BIC percentage for the control and 3D-P implant after healing for 3 and 6 weeks. Scale bar: 200 μm. *P < 0.05 compared to control group.

参考文献

[1]	Y.J. Park, Y.H. Song, J.H. An, H.J. Song, K.J. Anusavice, J. Dent. 41(2013)1251-1258.
[2]	A. Sidambe, Materials 7 (2014) 8168-8188.
[3]	A.A. Zadpoor, J. Malda, Ann. Biomed. Eng. 45(2017) 1-11.
[4]	J. Li, Y. Hsu, E. Luo, A. Khadka, J. Hu, Aesthetic Plast. Surg. 35(2011) 636-640.
[5]	G. Rasperini, S.P. Pilipchuk, C.L. Flanagan, C.H. Park, G. Pagni, S.J. Hollister,W.V. Giannobile, J. Dent.Res. 94(2015) 153S-157S.
[6]	W. Li, K. Yang, S. Yin, X. Yang, Y. Xu, R. Lupoi, J. Mater.Sci.Technol. 34(2017)440-457.
[7]	P.G. Coelho, J.M. Granjeiro, G.E. Romanos, M. Suzuki, N.R. Silva, G. Cardaropoli,V.P. Thompson, J.E. Lemons, J. Biomed.Mater.Res. B Appl. Biomater. 88(2009)579-596.
[8]	K.L. Lin, L.G. Xia, J.B. Gan, Z.Y. Zhang, H. Chen, X.Q. Jiang, J. Chang, ACS Appl.Mater. Interfaces 5 (2013) 8008-8017.
[9]	K.L. Lin, C.T. Wu, J. Chang, Acta Biomater. 10(2014) 4071-4102.
[10]	L. Le Guehennec, A. Soueidan, P. Layrolle, Y. Amouriq, Dent. Mater. 23(2007)844-854.
[11]	G. Tan, K. Ouyang, H. Wang, L. Zhou, X. Wang, Y. Liu, L. Zhang, C. Ning, J.Mater.Sci.Technol. 32(2016) 956-965.
[12]	J. Abdel-Haq, C.Z. Karabuda, V. Arisan, Z. Mutlu, M. Kurkcu, Clin. Oral ImplantsRes. 22(2011) 265-274.
[13]	M. Roccuzzo, M. Aglietta, M. Bunino, L. Bonino, Clin. Oral Implants Res. 19(2008) 148-152.
[14]	S. Amin Yavari, J. van der Stok, Y.C. Chai, R. Wauthle, Z. Tahmasebi Birgani, P.Habibovic, M. Mulier, J. Schrooten, H. Weinans, A.A. Zadpoor, Biomaterials 35(2014) 6172-6181.
[15]	W. Yuan, W. Hou, S. Li, Y. Hao, R. Yang, L.C. Zhang, Y. Zhu, J. Mater.Sci.Technol. 34(2017) 1127-1131.
[16]	K. Lin, L. Xia, H. Li, X. Jiang, H. Pan, Y. Xu, W.W. Lu, Z. Zhang, J. Chang,Biomaterials 34 (2013) 10028-10042.
[17]	J. Rouwkema, A. Khademhosseini, Trends Biotechnol. 34(2016) 733-745.
[18]	L.G. Xia, K.L. Lin, X.Q. Jiang, B. Fang, Y.J. Xu, J.Q. Liu, D.L. Zeng, M.L. Zhang, X.L.Zhang, J. Chang, Z.Y. Zhang, Biomaterials 35 (2014) 8514-8527.
[19]	D.L. Cochran, P.V. Nummikoski, J.D. Schoolfield, A.A. Jones, T.W. Oates, J.Periodontol. 80(2009) 725-733.
[20]	G. Zhao, Z. Schwartz, M. Wieland, F. Rupp, J. Geis-Gerstorfer, D.L. Cochran, B.D.Boyan, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A 74 (2005) 49-58.
[21]	C. Moerke, P. Mueller, B. Nebe, Biomaterials 76 (2016) 102-114.
[22]	F. Rupp, R.A. Gittens, L. Scheideler, A. Marmur, B.D. Boyan, Z. Schwartz, J.Geisgerstorfer, Acta Biomater. 10(2014) 2894-2906.
[23]	R.A. Gittens, L. Scheideler, F. Rupp, S.L. Hyzy, J. Geis-Gerstorfer, Z. Schwartz,B.D. Boyan, Acta Biomater. 10(2014) 2907-2918.
[24]	C.J. Wilson, R.E. Clegg, D.I. Leavesley, M.J. Pearcy, Tissue Eng. 11(2005) 1-18.
[25]	K. Anselme, Biomaterials 21 (2000) 667-681.
[26]	Z. Zhen, Y. Zheng, Z. Ge, C. Lai, T. Xi, J. Mater.Sci.Technol. 33(2017) 607-615.
[27]	L.Z. Zhao, S.L. Mei, P.K. Chu, Y.M. Zhang, Z.F. Wu, Biomaterials 31 (2010)5072-5082.
[28]	S. Xu, Z. Zhou, M. Gao, C. Zou, Y. Che, B. Cody, X. Zou, L. Zhou, J. Mater.Sci.Technol. 32(2016) 944-949.
[29]	S.M. Bang, H.J. Moon, Y.D. Kwon, J.Y. Yoo, A. Pae, I.K. Kwon, Clin. Oral ImplantsRes. 25(2014) 831-837.
[30]	I. Abrahamsson, T. Berglundh, E. Linder, N.P. Lang, J. Lindhe, Clin. OralImplants Res. 15(2004) 381-392.
[31]	K. Lin, X. Wang, N. Zhang, Y. Shen, J. Mater. Chem. B 4 (2016) 3632-3638.
[32]	C. Wu, Y. Zhou, M. Xu, P. Han, L. Chen, J. Chang, Y. Xiao, Biomaterials 34 (2013)422-433.
[33]	X. Yang, D. Wang, Y. Liang, H. Yin, S. Zhang, T. Jiang, Y. Wang, Y. Zhou, J.Biomed. Mater. Res. A 102 (2014) 2395-2407.

3D-printed surface promoting osteogenic differentiation and angiogenetic factor expression of BMSCs on Ti6Al4V implants and early osseointegration in vivo

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 9

参考文献

相关文章 0

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价