Journal of Materials Science & Technology  2019 , 35 (12): 2897-2905 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2019.07.018

Orginal Article

Effect of heat treatment temperature on microstructure and electromagnetic shielding properties of graphene/SiBCN composites

WeiYue, Yongsheng Liu*, Mingxi Zhao, Fang Ye, Laifei Cheng

Science and Technology on Thermostructural Composite Materials Laboratory, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an 710072, China

Corresponding authors:   *Corresponding author.E-mail address: yongshengliu@nwpu.edu.cn (L. Yongsheng).

Received: 2018-07-18

Revised:  2019-01-10

Accepted:  2019-05-15

Online:  2019-12-05

Copyright:  2019 Editorial board of Journal of Materials Science & Technology Copyright reserved, Editorial board of Journal of Materials Science & Technology

More

Abstract

Three-dimensional (3D) graphene/SiBCN composites (GF/SiBCN) were prepared by depositing SiBCN ceramics in 3D graphene foam via the chemical vapor infiltration technique. The effect of the heat treatment temperature on the microstructure, phase composition, and electromagnetic properties of the GF/SiBCN composite was investigated. The SiBCN ceramics maintained an amorphous structure in the composite below 1400 °C above which the crystallinity of the free carbon phase gradually increased. While the Si3N4 and B4C phases started to crystallize at 1500 °C and their crystallinity increased with temperature, SiC was observed at 1700 °C. The electromagnetic shielding effectiveness of GF/SiBCN increased with the heat treatment temperature.

Keywords: Silicon-Boron carbonitride ceramics ; Chemical vapor deposition and infiltration ; Heat treatment ; Electromagnetic shielding effectiveness

0

PDF (4145KB) Metadata Metrics Related articles

Cite this article Export EndNote Ris Bibtex

Yongsheng Liu, Mingxi Zhao, Fang Ye, Laifei Cheng. Effect of heat treatment temperature on microstructure and electromagnetic shielding properties of graphene/SiBCN composites[J]. Journal of Materials Science & Technology, 2019, 35(12): 2897-2905 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2019.07.018

1. Introduction

The rapid development of radar detection technologies has resulted in a higher demand of electromagnetic shielding materials with improved shielding efficiency and temperature resistance for the aerospace industry [1,2]. As an important candidate for electromagnetic shielding materials [[3], [4], [5], [6], [7]], graphene presents a number of excellent characteristics such as low density, high electrical conductivity [8], and large specific surface area [9]. However, graphene has a critical defect that while graphene withstands very high temperatures under an inert atmosphere, this material is susceptible to oxidize under oxygen environments above 200 °C. On the contrary, as a quaternary system based on SiC, Si3N4, and Si-C-N ceramics, SiBCN has superior thermal stability and oxidation resistance [10,11]. In addition, by adjusting the relative content of each component in the quaternary system, it is possible to tune the relative ratio of the wave-transmission, absorbing, and reflecting phases in the SiBCN ceramics, thereby achieving optimum electromagnetic shielding performance. Therefore, the GF was used as substrate and was surrounded by continuous and compact SiBCN through chemical vapor deposition (CVD) process to construct GF/SiBCN composites, which greatly utilized the thermal stability of SiBCN and formed a protective layer of GF to avoid oxidation. Furthermore, the GF/SiBCN integrated the great shielding properties of GF and the designability of SiBCN appropriately. Combined the above advantages, the GF/SiBCN composites have great potential to become a new electromagnetic shielding material.

Heat treatments have an important influence on the phase composition, microstructure, and properties of ternary or quaternary Si-based ceramics. Thus, the electromagnetic properties of SiBCN ceramics can be adjusted via heat treatment. In the case of SiCN ceramics prepared by the CVD method [12] at high temperatures, nano-SiC and free carbon phases were observed to crystallize at 1400-1600 °C. While these phases gradually improved the electromagnetic absorbing efficiency of the deposited SiCN, the nano-polarization effect disappeared via grain growth at 1700 °C, reducing the electromagnetic absorbing performance. In wave-transparent type CVD-SiBCN composites [13] (phase composition: Si3N4 + SiC + C + BN), Si3N4, BN, and free carbon phases were observed to crystallize at 1500-1600 °C, although the dielectric loss remained nearly unchanged because of the low crystallinity of the free carbon phase. At 1700 °C, the dielectric loss of the SiBCN ceramic increased via formation of SiC by the carbothermal reduction reaction.

To reveal the influence of crystallization behavior of SiBCN at high temperatures on the electromagnetic shielding properties, GF/SiBCN composites were heat treated at varying temperatures (i.e., 1400, 1500, 1600, and 1700 °C). The evolution of the microstructure, phase composition, and electromagnetic shielding properties of the GF/SiBCN composites was analyzed. This study aimed to further improve the electromagnetic shielding performance of these materials.

2. Experimental

Commercial graphene foam (GF) was used as deposition substrate (Six Carbon Science and Technology Company, Shen Zhen). This material had a bulk density of 0.0033 g/cm3 and an open porosity of 98%. Graphene was grown on the surface of porous nickel, and GF was obtained by subsequently immersing the as-grown graphene in HCl at 80 °C for 24 h to remove Ni. Then, GF was placed in a graphite box with uniform porosity to deposit SiBCN via chemical vapor infiltration at 950 °C. Methyltrichlorosilane (CH3SiCl3, MTS ≥ 99.99%), boron trichloride (BCl3 ≥ 99.99%), and ammonia (NH3 ≥ 99.99%) were used as gas precursors. Hydrogen (H2 ≥ 99.99%) was used as the carrier gas of MTS and the dilution gas. Argon (Ar ≥ 99.99%) was used as a protection and dilution gas. The as-obtained GF/SiBCN composites were machined to 24 mm × 12 mm pieces and heat-treated in a hot press furnace under a N2 atmosphere and at a pressure of 0.3 MPa at varying temperatures (1400, 1500, 1600, and 1700 °C).

The weights of the GF/SiBCN composites were measured by electronic balance (Mettler Toledo, AG204) with the precision of 0.0001 g. The shrinkage rate was calculated by the length measured with a Vernier caliper. The microstructure and phase composition were analyzed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM, S-4700, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) and X-ray diffraction (XRD, D8-Advance, Bruker, Karlsruhe, Germany), respectively. The Raman spectra of the composites were recorded on a Renishaw Ramoscope device (confocal Raman microscope, inVia, Renishaw, Gloucestershine, UK) to analyze the evolution of the C phase. The chemical bonding was studied by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, K-Alpha; Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The shielding effectiveness was calculated by the S parameter, which was measured with a vector network analyzer (VNA, MS4644A; Anritsu, Atsugi, Japan) using the transmission/reflection method [14,15].

3. Results and discussion

3.1. Evolution of microstructure and phase composition of the GF/SiBCN composites

3.1.1. Weight loss and shrinkage rates

Table 1 shows the weight loss and shrinkage rates of the GF/SiBCN composites prepared under an N2 atmosphere for 2 h at varying temperatures (1400-1700 °C). The shrinkage and mass loss rates of the GF/SiBCN composite increased with the heat treatment temperature. The shrinkage of GF/SiBCN composite can be mainly explained in terms of the amorphous state of the deposited SiBCN ceramics. The high-temperature heat treatment increased the energy of the atoms, favored their rearrangement and migration. These phenomena produced a certain volume shrinkage of the SiBCN ceramic in the composite, with graphene also being bent and shrunk simultaneously. The shrinkage of the composite was ultimately manifested as a bending contraction. The GF (impurity-free graphene) exhibited an excellent thermal stability and would not lose weight with temperature under an inert atmosphere. Thus, the weight loss of the GF/SiBCN composite was originated exclusively from the SiBCN ceramics.

Table 1   Weight loss and shrinkage of the GF/SiBCN composite annealed at different temperatures.

MaterialAnnealing temperature (oC)Weight loss rate (%)Line shrinkage rate (%)Body shrinkage rate (%)
GF/SiBCN14000.410.631.80
15000.841.232.07
16001.411.672.61
17002.122.103.63

New window

After the heat treatments at 1400 and 1500 °C, the weight loss rate of the composite was low and it increased significantly after the heat treatment at 1600 °C. Chai [16] proposed a certain solid phase reaction inside the SiBCN associated with the release of gas products, which could interpret the above phenomenon. The shrinkage and mass loss of the composite increased significantly after the heat treatment at 1700 °C, revealing significant structural changes in the SiBCN ceramic (from amorphous to crystalline).

3.1.2. Microstructure

The surface morphologies of the GF/SiBCN composites after the heat treatment at different temperatures are shown in Fig. 1. As shown in Fig. 1(a), the surface of the deposited amorphous SiBCN ceramics showed a dense and smooth continuous morphology. As shown in Fig. 1(b), after the heat treatment at 1400 °C, the surface morphology of the GF/SiBCN composite remained nearly unchanged. In contrast, the surface morphologies changed significantly after the heat treatments at 1500-1700 °C. Despite the surface of the composite remained dense and smooth after the heat treatment at 1500 °C, rod-shaped and trapezoidal crystallized products appeared (Fig. 1(c)). The diameter of the rod-shaped particles ranged from 0.1 to 0.39 μm and most of them were within 0.1-0.2 μm. The heat treatment at 1600 °C resulted in a uniform and rough surface (Fig. 1(d)), and the crystallized rods and trapezoids was covered. No significant changes in the particle size and the amount of rods. The surface morphology shifted to a glassy state after the heat treatment at 1700 °C (Fig. 1(e)). At this temperature, the composite showed a rougher and honeycomb-type structure, with higher amounts of crystallized rod and trapezoid products. We measured the diameter of the crystallized rod and trapezoid products (indicated by arrows). The size of these particles increased significantly (0.4-0.6 μm), suggesting that with new grains crystallized after the heat treatment at 1700 °C, the crystal grains grew simultaneously. At this point, the crystallization process of SiBCN was completed. In summary, the crystallization process of the GF/SiBCN composites was favored with the heat treatment temperature, and the number of types and yield of the crystallized phases also increased with this parameter.

Fig. 1.   Surface morphologies of the GF/SiBCN composites heat treated at different temperatures: (a) untreated; (b) 1400 °C; (c) 1500 °C; (d) 1600 °C; and (e) 1700 °C.

The cross-sectional morphologies of the GF/SiBCN composites after the different heat treatments are shown in Fig. 2. The changes of the morphologies of the cross section and the tubular structure on the surface were very different. A smooth and continuous graphene phase was clearly visible after heat treatments at varying temperatures. After the heat treatments at 1400 and 1500 °C, the morphologies of the hollow tubes remained nearly unchanged. When the temperature increased to 1600 °C (Fig. 2(c) and (c-1)), some filaments crystallized in the hollow section of the tube. These filaments possessed curved and straight parts, with diameters ranging from 0.1 to 0.6 μm. The partially enlarged view in the upper right corner of Fig. 2(c-1) revealed that SiBCN nucleated on the inner surface, resulting in line-shaped material. When the temperature was further increased to 1700 °C (Fig. 2(d) and (d-1)), the average diameter of the thread increased to 0.5-0.85 μm. As shown in the curve box of Fig. 2(d-1), the SiBCN near graphene (indicated by arrows in Fig. 2(d-1)) crystallized to a higher degree than in other position of the material. Thus, graphene sheets had a significant effect on the crystallization of the surrounding SiBCN. Several studies have pointed out that the crystallization of amorphous ceramics is closely related to its phase composition, substrate, and second phase incorporated. The substrate or the second phase incorporated would serve as nucleation centers during the heat treatment, promoting the crystallization of the ceramic [17,18]. In this paper, the graphene sheets and the amorphous SiBCN matrix possess numerous heterogeneous interfaces. The volume shrinkage of the composite during the heat treatment resulted in an internal stress that gradually concentrated at the heterogeneous interface. The concentrated interfacial stress favored the transition of the SiBCN matrix from amorphous to crystalline state and promoted the crystallization of numerous rod-shaped crystal nuclei. The thermal conductivity of graphene is significantly higher than that of SiBCN ceramics. The presence of graphene might provide a driving force for the nucleation and growth of SiBCN on its inner surface, and the tubular center provides enough space for the growth of crystal grains. Therefore, a large number of curled or linear crystal grains crystallized on the inner surface. These grains showed larger aspect ratios than the surface products. Thus, the closer to graphene is the SiBCN material, the more complete crystallization will be obtained.

Fig. 2.   Cross-section morphologies of the GF/SiBCN composites heat treated at different temperatures: (a) (a-1) 1400 °C; (b) (b-1) 1500 °C; (c) (c-1) 1600 °C; and (d) (d-1) 1700 °C.

3.1.3. Phase transition

The evolution of the crystallization of the C phase is very important in determining the electromagnetic shielding performance of the composites. Raman spectroscopy is extremely sensitive to the structure of free carbon and therefore is an effective method for tracking the evolution of the C-phase structure. Fig. 3 shows the Raman spectra of the surface of the GF/SiBCN composites. As indicated above, Raman spectra only provides structural transformation on the C phase in SiBCN. All the samples after the heat treatment showed the typical D and G peaks, indicating that the ceramics contained free carbon. After the heat treatment at 1400 °C, the D and G peaks partially overlapped, and the intensities of both peaks were very low, revealing a high level of disorder in the free carbon phase. After the heat treatment at 1500 °C, the D and G peaks separated, revealing higher degrees of crystallization for the free carbon phase. A further increase in the heat treatment temperature resulted in higher D/G peak intensity ratios (ID/IG) and lower FWHM values. The position of the D peak remained unchanged with temperature, while the G peak shifted to higher wave numbers (from 1590 to 1601 cm-1). The 2D peak at 2700 cm-1 appeared after the heat treatment at 1700 °C, and the ID/IG reached a maximum. These results indicated that the free carbon phase transformed from amorphous to graphite nanocrystals [19,20].

Fig. 3.   Raman spectra of the GF/SiBCN composites treated at different temperatures.

The crystallization behavior of the GF/SiBCN composites was characterized by XRD. Fig. 4 shows the XRD patterns of the GF/SiBCN composite after the different heat treatments. After the heat treatment at 1400 °C, only the (002) diffraction peak of graphene and the amorphous bulge of the SiBCN ceramic were observed, with no new phases crystallized. These results were in line with surface morphology of the composite after the heat treatment at 1400 °C revealed by SEM. The diffraction peaks corresponding to α-Si3N4 and B4C phases appeared at 1500 °C. The intensity of these peaks increased with the heat treatment temperature, revealing the crystallinity of these phase increased with the temperature and reached a maximum at 1700 °C. The diffraction peaks of SiC only appeared after the heat treatment at 1700 °C. Since the peaks of C phase overlapped with those of α-Si3N4 at 2θ = 26.6°, it was difficult to determine the crystallization of the C phase by XRD.

Fig. 4.   X-ray diffraction patterns of the GF/SiBCN composite treated at different temperatures.

The XPS narrow-spectra showed the existence of B-N species in the original GF/SiBCN composites (Fig. 5) and Nan Chai et al. observed crystallization of BN of a heat-treated wave-transparent SiBCN [13]. However, no diffraction peaks of BN were observed in our samples after heat treatment by XRD. Two possible reasons can explain this phenomenon: (i) the content of crystallized BN is very low, which prevented XRD from detecting its diffraction peaks and (ii) as proposed by Nan Chai et al., the following carbothermal reduction reaction occurred when the SiBCN prepared by CVD was heat-treated above 1600 °C [21]:

4BN + C→B4C+2N2

Si3N4+3C→3SiC+2N2

Fig. 5.   High resolution XPS spectra of the surface of the GF/SiBCN composites: (a) C1s; (b) B1s; and (c) Si2p.

Since the BN could react with the C-phase and form B4C. Therefore, after the heat treatment at 1700 °C, the intensity of the B4C diffraction peak increased significantly.

Fig. 6 shows the XPS bonding analysis of the GF/SiBCN composites after the heat treatments at 1400-1700 °C. Table 2 summarizes the relative contents of the bonds. As shown in Fig. 6, three different B species (B-C, B-N and B-O) were observed, with B-C prevailing at all heat treatment temperatures. These results confirmed the presence of a BN phase. Two different Si species (Si-N and Si-C) were observed. The relative contents of Si-N and Si-C remained constant within the XPS error range after the heat treatments at 1400-1600 °C. However, at 1700 °C, the Si-N content decreased remarkably (from 48.68 to 30.53 at%) while the Si-C content increased (from 51.32-69.47 at%). C showed four different species (CC, C-Si, C_B, and C-O). As mentioned above, the signals of C_B and C-Si overlapped. When the heat treatment temperature increased to 1600 °C, the content of C-Si or C_B species increased notably (from 2.77 to 9.44 at%). The change in amounts of Si and C was also indicative of the carbothermal reduction reaction starting at 1600 °C, although the extent of the reaction was very low.

Fig. 6.   High resolution XPS spectra of the GF/SiBCN composites annealed at different temperatures.

Table 2   Bonding states and contents analyzed by XPS for the GF/SiBCN composites treated at different temperatures.

Bonding typeBonding content (at%)
HT-1400 °CHT-1500 °CHT-1600 °CHT-1700 °C
Si2pSi-N57.5252.0448.6830.53
Si-C42.4847.9651.3269.47
C1sC-O38.8541.3024.6717.31
C-C59.4455.9265.8975.75
C-Si and C-B1.712.779.446.94
B1sB-O6.84---
B-N19.3712.5929.7624.3
B-C73.7987.4170.2475.67

New window

The microstructure of the samples after heat treatments was further studied using transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Fig. 7 shows the TEM images of the GF/SiBCN composites after heat treatment at 1700 °C. As shown in Fig. 7(a), nanoparticles of different sizes (shown by arrows) crystallized after the heat treatment. High-resolution TEM (Fig. 7(a) and (b)) revealed a variety of crystallized phases in the composite. According to the lattice spacing and XRD results, these phases contained nanocrystals of Si3N4, SiC, B4C and free carbon with chaotic graphite shape. SiC was dispersed with an average grain diameter of 4.4 nm, while the Si3N4 grains were larger in diameter. The small-size SiC grains were surrounded by large-size Si3N4, forming numerous nano-interfaces. The content of B4C was very small, in line with the XRD pattern. A layered graphite shaped free carbon phase with numerous defects was also observed. Both the nano-interfaces and defects favor the absorption of electromagnetic wave.

Fig. 7.   TEM analysis of the GF/SiBCN composite annealed at 1700 °C: (a) low magnification; (b) and (c) high magnification.

Fig. 8 shows the microstructure evolution of the GF/SiBCN composites during the heat treatment. The prepared composite consisted of an amorphous matrix, graphene, a small amount of free carbon, and nano SiC grains. Initially, the graphene sheet was straight and flat and, after the heat treatment, it bent because of the shrinkage of the ceramic matrix. After the heat treatment at 1500 °C, both the free carbon content and the crystallinity increased, and Si3N4 and B4C began to crystallize at this point. After the heat treatment at 1600 °C, a curled, thin rod-like Si3N4 phase crystallized in the center of the tube and thickened with the heat treatment temperature. At the same time, SiC gradually crystallized. After the heat treatment at 1700 °C, the crystallization of the free carbon, Si3N4, B4C, and SiC phases was completed, with some Si3N4 grains gradually growing.

Fig. 8.   Schematic diagram showing the evolution of the microstructure for the GF/SiBCN composites annealed at different temperatures.

In summary, after the heat treatments, GF/SiBCN showed a phase composition comprised of graphene + SiC + α-Si3N4 + B4C + C + BN.

3.2. Electromagnetic shielding effectiveness and mechanism

The electromagnetic shielding effectiveness of the GF/SiBCN composites after the heat treatments at 1400-1700 °C is shown in Fig. 9. Three kinds of shielding effectiveness gradually increased with the heat treatment temperature. An increase in the reflection shielding effectiveness (SER) reveals an impedance mismatch between the material and the free space increases as the frequency of the electromagnetic wave changes. An increase in absorption shielding effectiveness (SEA) indicates higher electromagnetic wave attenuation abilities of the material [22,23]. After the heat treatment at 1700 °C, SEA increased by 50% compared to the untreated sample (16.8 vs 11.2 dB at 10 GHz). SER improved after the heat treatment at 1400 °C and remained nearly unchanged at higher temperatures. SEA improved to a larger extent compared to SER. After the heat treatment at 1700 °C, the specific shielding effectiveness increased further to 40 dB·cm3/g. It is generally accepted that a material with a total shielding effectiveness of 20 dB (i.e., 99% of the incident electromagnetic wave is shielded) can satisfy most commercial applications [24]. Table 3 summarizes the shielding performance of the C/ceramic composites. After the heat treatments, the GF/SiBCN composites prepared herein showed superior specific shielding effectiveness with minimum thickness. Additionally, the total shielding effectiveness of these materials meet the commercial requirement of 20 dB. Therefore, the GF/SiBCN composites are excellent high-temperature resisting and lightweight electromagnetic shielding materials.

Fig. 9.   (a) SEA; (b) SER; and (c) SET of the GF/SiBCN composites annealed at 1400-1700 °C and (d) SE at 10 GHz.

Table 3   Comparison of the EMI SEs and specific EMI SEs for different carbon/ceramic composites.

MatrixFillerFiller contentThickness (mm)EMI SE (dB)Specific EMI SE (dB•cm3/g)Ref.
Al2O3GN2vol%1.522~6.1[25]
BaTiO3GN4wt%1.541.7~7.6[26]
B4CGN5vol%237-3915[27]
Si3N4PyC11.7 vol%1.4~36~17.6[28]
2.843.2~21.2
SiO2MWCNT10vol%533~15[29]
SiBCNGF0.5 wt%1.325.540This work

New window

The improvement of the electromagnetic shielding effectiveness was carried out in the following two stages: before 1600 °C, the entire GF/SiBCN composite underwent body shrinkage after the heat treatment, and the linear shrinkage rate increased with the temperature (Table 1). The shrinkage of SiBCN caused the shrinkage of graphene sheets. Since the size of the specimens used in the S-parameter tests was all 22.86 mm × 10.12 mm, the shrinkage of the composite after the heat treatment resulted in larger volume percentage of graphene in the S-parameter test, thereby increased SEA and SER. At the same time, the Raman spectra showed that the free carbon crystallinity increased with the heat treatment temperature, this resulting in gradual increases of the absorption and shielding effectiveness. In the second stage, at 1700 °C, the crystallization of SiC and free carbon finalized. At this point, both SiC and free carbon phases were in the form of nanocrystals and formed a conductive network. The carriers could pass through the SiC and free carbon grains by tunneling effect, thereby increasing the leakage current of the ceramic and the conduction losses. Secondly, the number of interfaces, dangling bonds, and defects in the sample increased with the increase in the amount of SiC nanocrystal grains and free carbon phase. Under an alternating electromagnetic field, interfacial and dipole polarizations were generated and relaxation phenomena occurred because the polarizations lagged behind the periodic change of the electromagnetic field, resulting in larger polarization losses. Therefore, when the electromagnetic wave penetrated into the interior of the porous composite, part of it was consumed via conduction losses of graphene and another fraction of it was multiply reflected by the skeleton and subsequently dissipated via the conductance and polarization losses of SiBCN.

When an electromagnetic wave is incident on the surface of a material, reflection precedes absorption. In order to clearly show the contributions of the absorption and reflection shielding effectiveness to the overall shielding effectiveness, Fig. 10 shows the average reflectance, transmission and absorption values for the composite as a function of the heat treatment temperature. The total power transmitted was 100% in all cases. The reflected power increased first with the heat treatment temperature and levelled off thereafter at ca. 88% after the heat treatment. The absorbed power followed the opposite trend compared to the reflected power. The absorbed power dropped from 16 to 9% and then increased to 12% with the heat temperature. As indicated above, the free carbon crystallinity was very low, and the absorption of the electromagnetic waves was very weak at 1400 °C. The shrinkage of graphene increased the surface reflection at the expense of decreasing the absorption inside the material. The crystallization of free carbon and SiC increased with the temperature, increasing the absorption of electromagnetic waves by the material. Therefore, the absorption coefficient started to increase again. In general, more than 80% of an electromagnetic wave is typically reflected and less than 20% is absorbed before and after heat treatment of materials. The reflection loss was greater than the absorption loss, in line with the above results. Although the shielding effectiveness (SE) characterizes the ability of a material to shield an electromagnetic wave, it does not provide the actual shielding of electromagnetic waves. Thus, the absorption shielding effectiveness plays a major role only in the case of there is no surface reflections in the material. The ratio of the electromagnetic wave power reflected on the surface of the material to the power of the original incident electromagnetic wave can therefore characterize the reflective shielding effectiveness of the material. Calculations indicated that this ratio ranged from 0.80 to 0.90 with the heat treatment temperature. The ratio of the electromagnetic wave power absorbed by the material to the electromagnetic wave power incident on the interior of material can be used to characterize the absorbing shielding effectiveness of the material, and the electromagnetic wave power balance diagram revealed this ratio of ca. 0.93-0.98, which meant that as long as the electromagnetic wave penetrated to the interior of the material, most of it could be absorbed. The transmission power decreased from 0.90 to 0.27% with the heat treatment temperature. The transmission power was negligible compared to the reflected electromagnetic wave power and the absorbed electromagnetic wave power. In other words, no electromagnetic wave could substantially penetrate the composite, which reveals the excellent electromagnetic wave shielding properties of the material.

Fig. 10.   Reflected, transmitted, and absorbed power of the GF/SiBCN composite as a function of the heat-treatment temperature.

4. Conclusions

The effects of the heat treatment temperature on the microstructure, phase composition, and electromagnetic shielding properties of GF/SiBCN composites were investigated. The following conclusions can be drawn:

(1)The weight loss and shrinkage rates of the composite increased with the heat treatment temperature. After the heat treatment at 1600 °C, the weight loss and the shrinkage of the composite increased significantly as a result of the higher crystallinity of the composite. At this temperature, a weak carbothermal reduction occurred, releasing small amounts of N2.

(2)The amorphous state of the composite was maintained at 1400 °C, and the crystallinity of the free carbon phase gradually increased with the heat treatment temperature. After heat treatment at 1500 °C, Si3N4 and B4C began to crystallize and the crystallinity increased with the heat treatment temperature. SiC did not crystallize until 1700 °C. At this temperature, small-sized nano SiC grains were surrounded by large-sized nano-Si3N4 grains, forming many nano-interfaces. These interfaces and defects in the free carbon phases favored the absorption of electromagnetic waves by the material.

(3)The electromagnetic shielding effectiveness of the composites increased with the heat treatment temperature. After the heat treatment at 1700 °C, the total shielding effectiveness increased from 18.4 to 25.5 dB, while the specific shielding effectiveness increased from 29 to 40 dB·cm3/g. In addition, the absorption shielding efficiency increased to a larger extent than the reflection shielding effectiveness.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2018YFB1106600), the Chinese National Foundation for Natural Sciences under Contracts (No. 51672217, 51572224), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant no. 3102019ghxm014).


/