J. Mater. Sci. Technol. ›› 2021, Vol. 69: 20-31.DOI: 10.1016/j.jmst.2020.06.050
• Research Article • Previous Articles Next Articles
Bo Songa,*(), Zhiwen Dua, Ning Guoa, Qingshan Yangb,*(), Fang Wanga, Shengfeng Guoa, Renlong Xinc,*()
Received:
2020-05-03
Revised:
2020-06-08
Accepted:
2020-06-20
Published:
2021-04-10
Online:
2021-05-15
Contact:
Bo Song,Qingshan Yang,Renlong Xin
About author:
rlxin@cqu.edu.cn (R. Xin).Bo Song, Zhiwen Du, Ning Guo, Qingshan Yang, Fang Wang, Shengfeng Guo, Renlong Xin. Effect of free-end torsion on microstructure and mechanical properties of AZ31 bars with square section[J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2021, 69: 20-31.
Fig. 2. (a) Distribution of shear stress on the cross-section of the specimen with square section during free-end torsion. (b) Equivalent stress state between simple shear and bi-axial normal stresses. Finite element simulation of reciprocating torsion: equivalent strain contour plot of (c) AR sample; (d) the sample twisted to 108° at anticlockwise and (e) ART108 sample.
Fig. 4. The orientation of compressive component in {0001} pole figure in some typical regions during reciprocating torsion. Red pentagram and blue pentagram are the compressive orientations when twisted at anticlockwise and clockwise, respectively. The curve in each pole figure is the trajectory of the change in the stress axis from region A to region C. (a) region A; (b) region B and (c) region C.
Fig. 6. {0001} pole figures, IPF maps, GB maps and KAM maps of typical regions in ART108 sample: (a) R9 (close to torsion axis); (b) R3 (~60 μm from the upper surface); (c) R3′ (~550 μm from the lower surface).
Fig. 7. EBSD data of region R3 with maximum shear stress in ART108 sample. (a) {0001} pole figures of parent twins and twins; (b) schemes of deformation history during reciprocating torsion; (c)-(e) EBSD maps and corresponding crystallographic orientations of typical grains. Here, Pi and Tij (i, j = 1; 2; 3 …) represent the parent grain and twin lamellae, respectively. Red pentagram and blue pentagram are the compressive orientations when twisted at anticlockwise and clockwise, respectively.
Schmid factor of each variant | Rank | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
V1 | V2 | V3 | V4 | V5 | V6 | |||
P1-T11 | Anticlockwise | 0.0971 | 0.0828 | -0.2642 | -0.2737 | 0.0734 | 0.0495 | 5 |
Clockwise | 0.2642 | 0.2737 | -0.0828 | -0.0971 | -0.0734 | -0.0495 | 2 | |
P2-T21 | Anticlockwise | 0.0427 | 0.0557 | 0.2592 | 0.2492 | -0.134 | -0.157 | 1 |
Clockwise | -0.2605 | -0.2527 | -0.0482 | -0.0632 | 0.1539 | 0.1311 | 6 | |
P3-T31 | Anticlockwise | -0.234 | -0.2187 | 0.1643 | 0.1807 | 0.0689 | 0.07 | 6 |
Clockwise | 0.2386 | 0.2241 | -0.1579 | -0.1747 | -0.0677 | -0.0699 | 1 | |
P4-T41 | Anticlockwise | -0.2069 | -0.2204 | 0.2014 | 0.1818 | -0.0595 | -0.0657 | 6 |
Clockwise | -0.2035 | -0.1841 | 0.2043 | 0.2181 | 0.0656 | 0.0599 | 2 |
Table 1 Schmid factor of primary {10-12} twinning in various grains during torsion as shown in Fig. 7. The active variant is highlighted in bold.
Schmid factor of each variant | Rank | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
V1 | V2 | V3 | V4 | V5 | V6 | |||
P1-T11 | Anticlockwise | 0.0971 | 0.0828 | -0.2642 | -0.2737 | 0.0734 | 0.0495 | 5 |
Clockwise | 0.2642 | 0.2737 | -0.0828 | -0.0971 | -0.0734 | -0.0495 | 2 | |
P2-T21 | Anticlockwise | 0.0427 | 0.0557 | 0.2592 | 0.2492 | -0.134 | -0.157 | 1 |
Clockwise | -0.2605 | -0.2527 | -0.0482 | -0.0632 | 0.1539 | 0.1311 | 6 | |
P3-T31 | Anticlockwise | -0.234 | -0.2187 | 0.1643 | 0.1807 | 0.0689 | 0.07 | 6 |
Clockwise | 0.2386 | 0.2241 | -0.1579 | -0.1747 | -0.0677 | -0.0699 | 1 | |
P4-T41 | Anticlockwise | -0.2069 | -0.2204 | 0.2014 | 0.1818 | -0.0595 | -0.0657 | 6 |
Clockwise | -0.2035 | -0.1841 | 0.2043 | 0.2181 | 0.0656 | 0.0599 | 2 |
Schmid factor of each variant | Rank | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
V1 | V2 | V3 | V4 | V5 | V6 | |||
P3-T32 | Anticlockwise | -0.2403 | -0.2291 | 0.1694 | 0.1833 | 0.0464 | 0.0492 | 1 |
T32-T33 | Clockwise | 0.2704 | 0.3007 | 0.3104 | 0.3544 | 0.1721 | 0.1859 | 3 |
P32-T34 | Clockwise | 0.2704 | 0.3007 | 0.3104 | 0.3544 | 0.1721 | 0.1859 | 1 |
P4-T42 | Anticlockwise | -0.2017 | -0.213 | 0.2116 | 0.1946 | -0.0568 | -0.0623 | 1 |
T42-T43 | Clockwise | 0.4276 | 0.4041 | 0.3868 | 0.3789 | 0.2064 | 0.2221 | 3 |
Table 2 Schmid factor of secondary {10-12} twinning in various grains during torsion as shown in Fig. 7. The active variant is highlighted in bold.
Schmid factor of each variant | Rank | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
V1 | V2 | V3 | V4 | V5 | V6 | |||
P3-T32 | Anticlockwise | -0.2403 | -0.2291 | 0.1694 | 0.1833 | 0.0464 | 0.0492 | 1 |
T32-T33 | Clockwise | 0.2704 | 0.3007 | 0.3104 | 0.3544 | 0.1721 | 0.1859 | 3 |
P32-T34 | Clockwise | 0.2704 | 0.3007 | 0.3104 | 0.3544 | 0.1721 | 0.1859 | 1 |
P4-T42 | Anticlockwise | -0.2017 | -0.213 | 0.2116 | 0.1946 | -0.0568 | -0.0623 | 1 |
T42-T43 | Clockwise | 0.4276 | 0.4041 | 0.3868 | 0.3789 | 0.2064 | 0.2221 | 3 |
Fig. 8. EBSD data of ART108 sample. (a) {0001} pole figure and EBSD maps in region R5; (b) {0001} pole figure and EBSD maps in region R7 (~75 μm from the surface); (c) Typical grains and corresponding crystallographic orientations in region R5; (b) Typical grains and corresponding crystallographic orientations in region R7; Here, Pi and Tij (i, j = 1; 2; 3 …) represent the parent grain and twin lamellae, respectively. Schmid factor values of typical grains are calculated during torsion at clockwise.
Fig. 10. (a) Various positions on the cross-section; (b) orientations of normal stress on various positions during torsion at clockwise; (c) main texture components on various positions of ART sample. The red dot is the initial orientation and the blue dot is the new orientation via torsion in the pole figure of (c).
Fig. 12. Misorientation angle distributions. The misorientation rotation axis distributions are shown for some of the angular ranges in the crystal coordinate system. (a) AR sample, (b) region R3 of ART108 sample, (c) region R5 of ART108 sample, (d) region R7 of ART108 sample.
Fig. 13. 2D hardness maps on cross-section with a size of 5 mm × 5 mm of various samples (a) AR sample; (b) ART36 sample; (c) ART72 sample; (d) ART108 sample.
Sample | YS (MPa) | PS (MPa) | UP | Sample | YS (MPa) | PS (MPa) | UP | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AR | TD | 58 ± 2 | 272 ± 1 | 0.27 ± 0.03 | ART36 | TD | 63 ± 2 | 285 ± 1 | 0.22 ± 0.03 |
ND | 134 ± 3 | 262 ± 3 | 0.22 ± 0.01 | ND | 162 ± 3 | 268 ± 2 | 0.19 ± 0.02 | ||
RD | 53 ± 1 | 276 ± 5 | 0.21 ± 0.02 | RD | 73 ± 2 | 292 ± 4 | 0.18 ± 0.02 | ||
ART72 | TD | 86 ± 4 | 293 ± 1 | 0.23 ± 0.03 | ART108 | TD | 110 ± 3 | 305 ± 3 | 0.21 ± 0.03 |
ND | 167 ± 3 | 259 ± 3 | 0.17 ± 0.03 | ND | 156 ± 5 | 267 ± 4 | 0.15 ± 0.04 | ||
RD | 95 ± 2 | 292 ± 2 | 0.16 ± 0.05 | RD | 118 ± 2 | 305 ± 1 | 0.15 ± 0.02 |
Table 3 Compressive mechanical properties of different samples along various directions. YS is yield strength, PS is peak strength and Up is the plastic strain corresponding to peak stress.
Sample | YS (MPa) | PS (MPa) | UP | Sample | YS (MPa) | PS (MPa) | UP | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AR | TD | 58 ± 2 | 272 ± 1 | 0.27 ± 0.03 | ART36 | TD | 63 ± 2 | 285 ± 1 | 0.22 ± 0.03 |
ND | 134 ± 3 | 262 ± 3 | 0.22 ± 0.01 | ND | 162 ± 3 | 268 ± 2 | 0.19 ± 0.02 | ||
RD | 53 ± 1 | 276 ± 5 | 0.21 ± 0.02 | RD | 73 ± 2 | 292 ± 4 | 0.18 ± 0.02 | ||
ART72 | TD | 86 ± 4 | 293 ± 1 | 0.23 ± 0.03 | ART108 | TD | 110 ± 3 | 305 ± 3 | 0.21 ± 0.03 |
ND | 167 ± 3 | 259 ± 3 | 0.17 ± 0.03 | ND | 156 ± 5 | 267 ± 4 | 0.15 ± 0.04 | ||
RD | 95 ± 2 | 292 ± 2 | 0.16 ± 0.05 | RD | 118 ± 2 | 305 ± 1 | 0.15 ± 0.02 |
[1] |
X.J. Wang, D.K. Xu, R.Z. Wu, X.B. Chen, Q.M. Peng, L. Jin, Y.C. Xin, Z.Q. Zhang, Y. Liu, X.H. Chen, G. Chen, K.K. Deng, H.Y. Wang, J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 34 (2) (2018) 245-247.
DOI URL |
[2] |
J. Wu, L. Jin, J. Dong, F. Wang, S. Dong, J. Mater. Sci. Technol 42 (2020) 175-189.
DOI URL |
[3] |
C. Liu, Y. Zhu, Q. Luo, B. Liu, Q. Gu, Q. Li, J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 34 (12) (2018) 2235-2239.
DOI URL |
[4] |
Y. Chai, Y. Song, B. Jiang, J. Fu, Z. Jiang, Q. Yang, H. Sheng, G. Huang, D. Zhang, F. Pan, J. Magnes. Alloy. 7 (4) (2019) 545-554.
DOI URL |
[5] |
B. Song, J. She, N. Guo, R. Qiu, H. Pan, L. Chai, C. Yang, S. Guo, R. Xin, Materials 12 (16) (2019), 2507.
DOI URL |
[6] |
B. Song, Q. Yang, T. Zhou, L. Chai, N. Guo, T. Liu, S. Guo, R. Xin, J. Mater. Sci. Technol 35 (2019) 2269-2282.
DOI |
[7] |
M. Zecevic, I.J. Beyerlein, M. Knezevic, J. Mech. Phys. Solids 111 (2018) 290-307.
DOI URL |
[8] |
S.H. Park, S.-G. Hong, J.-H. Lee, S.-H. Kim, Y.-R. Cho, J. Yoon, C.S. Lee, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 680 (2017) 351-358.
DOI URL |
[9] |
X. Liu, L. Lu, K. Sheng, Y. Xiang, Z. Wu, JOM 71 (2019) 4726-4736.
DOI URL |
[10] |
J. Jiang, J. Wu, S. Ni, H. Yan, M. Song, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 712 (2018) 478-484.
DOI URL |
[11] |
Y.J. Kim, S.-H. Kim, J.U. Lee, J.O. Choi, H.S. Kim, Y.M. Kim, Y. Kim, S.H. Park, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 708 (2017) 405-410.
DOI URL |
[12] |
H. Zhang, G. Huang, L. Wang, H.J. Roven, Z. Xu, F. Pan, Scr. Mater. 69 (1) (2013) 49-52.
DOI URL |
[13] |
B. Song, H. Pan, L. Chai, N. Guo, H. Zhao, R. Xin, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 689 (2017) 78-88.
DOI URL |
[14] |
Y. Zhang, L. Tan, Q. Wang, M. Gao, I.P. Etim, K. Yang, J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 51 (2020) 102-110.
DOI URL |
[15] |
N. Guo, B. Song, H. Yu, R. Xin, B. Wang, T. Liu, Mater. Des. 90 (2016) 545-550.
DOI URL |
[16] |
Y. Wei, Y. Li, L. Zhu, Y. Liu, X. Lei, G. Wang, Y. Wu, Z. Mi, J. Liu, H. Wang, H. Gao, Nat. Commun. 5 (1) (2014) 3580.
DOI URL |
[17] |
B. Song, N. Guo, R. Xin, H. Pan, C. Guo, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 650 (2016) 300-304.
DOI URL |
[18] |
B. Song, X. Shu, H. Pan, G. Li, N. Guo, T. Liu, L. Chai, R. Xin, Adv. Eng. Mater. 19 (11) (2017), 1700267.
DOI URL |
[19] |
B. Song, C. Wang, N. Guo, H. Pan, R. Xin, Materials 10 (3) (2017) 280.
DOI URL |
[20] |
J. Wang, D. Zhang, Y. Li, Z. Xiao, J. Fouse, X. Yang, Mater. Des. 86 (2015) 526-535.
DOI URL |
[21] |
M. Jamalian, D.P. Field, J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 36 (2020) 45-49.
DOI URL |
[22] |
J. Wang, X. Yang, Y. Li, Z. Xiao, D. Zhang, T. Sakai, Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 25 (12) (2015) 3928-3935.
DOI URL |
[23] |
Q. Huo, Z. Xiao, X. Yang, D. Ando, Y. Sutou, J. Koike, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 696 (2017) 52-59.
DOI URL |
[24] |
N. Guo, B. Song, C. Guo, R. Xin, Q. Liu, Mater. Des. 83 (2015) 270-275.
DOI URL |
[25] |
H. Chen, B. Song, N. Guo, T. Liu, T. Zhou, J. He, Met. Mater. Int. 25 (2019) 147-158.
DOI URL |
[26] |
H. Chen, T. Liu, H. Yu, B. Song, D. Hou, N. Guo, J. He, Adv. Eng. Mater. 18 (2016) 1683-1689.
DOI URL |
[27] |
D. Rozumek, Z. Marciniak, Int. J. Fatigue 39 (2012) 81-87.
DOI URL |
[28] | H. Wang, P.D. Wu, J. Wang, Comp. Mater. Sci. 96 (2015) 214-218. |
[29] |
W. Wang, W. Chen, W. Zhang, G. Cui, E. Wang, J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 34 (11) (2018) 2042-2050.
DOI URL |
[30] |
S.-G. Hong, S.H. Park, C.S. Lee, Acta Mater. 58 (18) (2010) 5873-5885.
DOI URL |
[31] |
B. Beausir, L.S. Tóth, K.W. Neale, Acta Mater. 55 (8) (2007) 2695-2705.
DOI URL |
[32] |
B. Song, R. Xin, Y. Liang, G. Chen, Q. Liu, Mate. Sci. Eng. A 614 (2014) 106-115.
DOI URL |
[33] |
H. Pan, F. Wang, M. Feng, L. Jin, J. Dong, P. Wu, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 712 (2018) 585-591.
DOI URL |
[34] |
B. Song, R. Xin, G. Chen, X. Zhang, Q. Liu, Scripta Mater. 66 (12) (2012) 1061-1064.
DOI URL |
[35] |
Y. Cui, Y. Li, Z. Wang, X. Ding, Y. Koizumi, H. Bian, L. Lin, A. Chiba, Int. J. Plasticity 91 (2017) 134-159.
DOI URL |
[36] |
J. Xu, B. Guan, H. Yu, X. Cao, Y. Xin, Q. Liu, J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 32 (12) (2016) 1239-1244.
DOI URL |
[37] |
W. Ren, D. Liu, Q. Liu, R. Xin, J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 46 (2020) 168-176.
DOI URL |
[38] |
S.R. Agnew, Ö. Duygulu, Int. J. Plasticity 21 (6) (2005) 1161-1193.
DOI URL |
[39] |
X.Q. Guo, W. Wu, P.D. Wu, H. Qiao, K. An, P.K. Liaw, Scr. Mater. 69 (4) (2013) 319-322.
DOI URL |
[40] |
B. Wang, R. Xin, G. Huang, Q. Liu, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 534 (2012) 588-593.
DOI URL |
[41] |
L. Tan, X. Zhang, T. Xia, Q. Sun, G. Huang, R. Xin, Q. Liu, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 711 (2018) 205-211.
DOI URL |
[42] |
F. Guo, H. Yu, C. Wu, Y. Xin, C. He, Q. Liu, Sci. Rep. 7 (1) (2017) 8647.
DOI URL |
[43] |
S. Hyuk Park, S.-G. Hong, C.S. Lee, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 570 (2013) 149-163.
DOI URL |
[44] |
X. Guo, A. Chapuis, P. Wu, S.R. Agnew, Int. J. Solids Struct. 64-65 (2015) 42-50.
DOI URL |
[45] |
M.R. Barnett, Z. Keshavarz, A.G. Beer, D. Atwell, Acta Mater. 52 (17) (2004) 5093-5103.
DOI URL |
[46] |
X. Wu, Y. Zhu, Mater. Res. Lett. 5 (8) (2017) 527-532.
DOI URL |
[47] |
Y. Guo, Q. Luo, B. Liu, Q. Li, Scr. Mater. 178 (2020) 422-427.
DOI URL |
[48] |
X. Wan, J. Zhang, X. Mo, F. Pan, J. Magn. Alloy. 7 (3) (2019) 474-486.
DOI URL |
[49] | Q. Luo, C. Zhai, D. Sun, W. Chen, Q. Li, J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 35 (9) (2019) 2115-2120. |
[50] | Q. Luo, Y. Guo, B. Liu, Y. Feng, J. Zhang, Q. Li, Kuochih Chou, J.Mater. Sci. Technol. 44 (2020) 171-190. |
[51] |
Q. Luo, J. Li, B. Li, B. Liu, H. Shao, Q. Li, J. Magn. Alloy. 7 (1) (2019) 58-71.
DOI URL |
[1] | Shuai-Feng Chen, Hong-Wu Song, Ming Cheng, Ce Zheng, Shi-Hong Zhang, Myoung-Gyu Lee. Texture modification and mechanical properties of AZ31 magnesium alloy sheet subjected to equal channel angular bending [J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2021, 67(0): 211-225. |
[2] | C.C. Zhang, H.L. Wei, T.T. Liu, L.Y. Jiang, T. Yang, W.H. Liao. Influences of residual stress and micro-deformation on microstructures and mechanical properties for Ti-6.5Al-3.5Mo-1.5Zr-0.3Si alloy produced by laser powder bed fusion [J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2021, 75(0): 174-183. |
[3] | Zhixin Zhang, Jiangkun Fan, Ruifeng Li, Hongchao Kou, Zhiyong Chen, Qingjiang Wang, Hailong Zhang, Jian Wang, Qi Gao, Jinshan Li. Orientation dependent behavior of tensile-creep deformation of hot rolled Ti65 titanium alloy sheet [J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2021, 75(0): 265-275. |
[4] | Luyan Yang, Shuangming Li, Kai Fan, Yang Li, Yanhui Chen, Wei Li, Deli Kong, Pengfei Cao, Haibo Long, Ang Li. Twin crystal structured Al-10 wt.% Mg alloy over broad velocity conditions achieved by high thermal gradient directional solidification [J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2021, 71(0): 152-162. |
[5] | S. Bancora, C. Binetruy, S. Advani, S. Comas-Cardona. Inverse methodology as applied to reconstruct local textile features from measured pressure field [J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2021, 71(0): 241-247. |
[6] | Jing Chen, Liang Wu, Xingxing Ding, Qiang Liu, Xu Dai, Jiangfeng Song, Bin Jiang, Andrej Atrens, Fusheng Pan. Effects of deformation processes on morphology, microstructure and corrosion resistance of LDHs films on magnesium alloy AZ31 [J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2021, 64(0): 10-20. |
[7] | Jiayi Zhang, Yan Jin Lee, Hao Wang. Mechanochemical effect on the microstructure and mechanical properties in ultraprecision machining of AA6061 alloy [J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2021, 69(0): 228-238. |
[8] | Yu Han, Huabing Li, Hao Feng, Kemei Li, Yanzhong Tian, Zhouhua Jiang. Simultaneous enhancement in strength and ductility of Fe50Mn30Co10Cr10 high-entropy alloy via nitrogen alloying [J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2021, 65(0): 210-215. |
[9] | Sang Won Lee, Gukin Han, Tea-Sung Jun, Sung Hyuk Park. Effects of initial texture on deformation behavior during cold rolling and static recrystallization during subsequent annealing of AZ31 alloy [J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2021, 66(0): 139-149. |
[10] | Seong-Woo Choi, Jae Suk Jeong, Jong Woo Won, Jae Keun Hong, Yoon Suk Choi. Grade-4 commercially pure titanium with ultrahigh strength achieved by twinning-induced grain refinement through cryogenic deformation [J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2021, 66(0): 193-201. |
[11] | Durga Bhakta Pokharel, Liping Wu, Junhua Dong, Xin Wei, Ini-Ibehe Nabuk Etim, Dhruba Babu Subedi, Aniefiok Joseph Umoh, Wei Ke. Effect of D-fructose on the in-vitro corrosion behavior of AZ31 magnesium alloy in simulated body fluid [J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2021, 66(0): 202-212. |
[12] | Huhu Su, Xinzhe Zhou, Shijian Zheng, Hengqiang Ye, Zhiqing Yang. Atomic-resolution studies on reactions between basal dislocations and $\left\{ 10\bar{1}2 \right\}$ coherent twin boundaries in a Mg alloy [J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2021, 66(0): 28-35. |
[13] | Ying Niu, Yue Wang, Long Hou, Lansong Ba, Yanchao Dai, Yves Fautrelle, Zongbin Li, Zhongming Ren, Xi Li. Effect of γ phase on mechanical behavior and detwinning evolution of directionally solidified Ni-Mn-Ga alloys under uniaxial compression [J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2021, 66(0): 91-96. |
[14] | Jia Sun, Min Qi, Jinhu Zhang, Xuexiong Li, Hao Wang, Yingjie Ma, Dongsheng Xu, Jiafeng Lei, Rui Yang. Formation mechanism of α lamellae during β→α transformation in polycrystalline dual-phase Ti alloys [J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2021, 71(0): 98-108. |
[15] | Bingqiang Wei, Song Ni, Yong Liu, Min Song. Structural characterization of the {11$\overline 2$2} twin boundary and the corresponding stress accommodation mechanisms in pure titanium [J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2021, 72(0): 114-121. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||