J. Mater. Sci. Technol. ›› 2020, Vol. 50: 115-127.DOI: 10.1016/j.jmst.2019.12.036
• Research Article • Previous Articles Next Articles
Anil Kunwara,b,*(), Lili Anc, Jiahui Liuc, Shengyan Shangc, Peter Råback4, Haitao Mac, Xueguan Songb
Received:
2019-11-10
Revised:
2019-12-18
Accepted:
2019-12-18
Published:
2020-08-01
Online:
2020-08-10
Contact:
Anil Kunwar
Anil Kunwar, Lili An, Jiahui Liu, Shengyan Shang, Peter Råback, Haitao Ma, Xueguan Song. A data-driven framework to predict the morphology of interfacial Cu6Sn5 IMC in SAC/Cu system during laser soldering[J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2020, 50: 115-127.
Fig. 1. Schematic sketch outlining the major variables (P, Vscan and solder composition) in an experimental setup for laser soldering. The point $~\chi$ is located at the bottom corner corresponding to the start point of the laser beam.
Solder type | mAg | mCu | mSn |
---|---|---|---|
Pure Sn | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 |
Sn-0.7Cu | 0.0 | 0.007 | 0.993 |
Sn-3.5Ag | 0.035 | 0.0 | 0.965 |
Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu | 0.03 | 0.005 | 0.965 |
Sn-3.5Ag-0.5Cu | 0.035 | 0.005 | 0.96 |
Sn-3.5Ag-0.7Cu | 0.035 | 0.007 | 0.958 |
Table 1 Composition of Pb-free solder alloys expressed in weight fraction of Ag, Cu and Sn.
Solder type | mAg | mCu | mSn |
---|---|---|---|
Pure Sn | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 |
Sn-0.7Cu | 0.0 | 0.007 | 0.993 |
Sn-3.5Ag | 0.035 | 0.0 | 0.965 |
Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu | 0.03 | 0.005 | 0.965 |
Sn-3.5Ag-0.5Cu | 0.035 | 0.005 | 0.96 |
Sn-3.5Ag-0.7Cu | 0.035 | 0.007 | 0.958 |
Fig. 2. SEM images of experimental solders of different initial composition and laser processed at different combinations of input power (P) and scan speed (Vscan): (a) scalloped and (b) prismatic morphology of Cu6Sn5 IMC compounds as obtained at the interface, respectively.
Fig. 3. (a) Effects of input power and scan speed on IMC morphology transition from scalloped to prismatic or vice-versa for a Sn-0.7Cu solder and (b) effects of solder types at given laser input power on IMC morphologies.
Properties | Units | Pure Sn | Sn-0.7Cu | Sn-3.5Ag | Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu | Sn-3.5Ag-0.5Cu | Sn-3.5Ag-0.7Cu |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
kth (298.15 K) | W/(m K) | 67.0 | 53.0 | 57.26 | 57.26 | 57.26 | 57.26 |
ρ(298.15 K) | kg/m3 | 7310 | 7300 | 7360 | 7340 | 7450 | 7500 |
ν(823.0 K) | mPa S | 1.132 | 1.509 | 1.181 | 1.400 | 1.450 | 1.550 |
β | (×10-6) K-1 | 20.88 | 20.88 | 20.88 | 20.88 | 20.88 | 20.88 |
Ω | μm-1 | 7 × 10-3 | 7 × 10-3 | 7 × 10-3 | 7 × 10-3 | 7 × 10-3 | 7 × 10-3 |
Table 2 Material properties used in numerical simulation. Thermal conductivity, density and viscosity are utilized as functions of temperature in the finite element model.
Properties | Units | Pure Sn | Sn-0.7Cu | Sn-3.5Ag | Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu | Sn-3.5Ag-0.5Cu | Sn-3.5Ag-0.7Cu |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
kth (298.15 K) | W/(m K) | 67.0 | 53.0 | 57.26 | 57.26 | 57.26 | 57.26 |
ρ(298.15 K) | kg/m3 | 7310 | 7300 | 7360 | 7340 | 7450 | 7500 |
ν(823.0 K) | mPa S | 1.132 | 1.509 | 1.181 | 1.400 | 1.450 | 1.550 |
β | (×10-6) K-1 | 20.88 | 20.88 | 20.88 | 20.88 | 20.88 | 20.88 |
Ω | μm-1 | 7 × 10-3 | 7 × 10-3 | 7 × 10-3 | 7 × 10-3 | 7 × 10-3 | 7 × 10-3 |
Fig. 5. Temperature profile corresponding to t = 1.0 s, at the different positions of a pure Sn solder irradiated by different combinations of input power and scan speed.
Fig. 6. Numerically computed values of Tif at point $\chi$ in bottom interface for pure Sn modeled with different combinations of P and Vscan. The T-t curves shown in the figure can be utilized for solder joint design for dynamic heat source conditions.
Fig. 7. Temperature profile corresponding to t = 2.0 s, at the different positions of a Sn-xAg-yCu solders irradiated with input power P = 30 W and scan speed = 60 mm/min: (a) the color bar scaled in the range of 500-600 K for getting meticulous temperature profile within the first 1 mm length from the left end; (b) the complete solder geometries and the color bar is set in the range 298-800 K.
Fig. 8. Simulated values of Tif at point $\chi$ in bottom interface for pure Sn-xAg-yCu solder alloys corresponding to P = 30 W and Vscan = 60 mm/min.
Fig. 9. Result from multi-phase field simulation for grain growth study of two identical IMC grains performed at constant interface temperatures Tif of 453.15 K and 523.15 K.
Fig. 10. Simulated results for sum of squared order parameters (($\underset{i}{\mathop \sum }\,{{({{\eta }_{i}})}^{2}}$) at constant interface temperatures Tif of (a) 453.15 K and (b) 523.15 K.
Fig. 11. A feed forward neural network for regression analysis between input features (solder composition and laser processing parameters) and output feature (Jackson parameter).
Cases | Neurons in HL 1 | Neurons in HL 2 | MSE (Training) | MSE (Validation) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
I | 5 | - | 2.3 × 10-2 | 1.8 × 10-2 | |||
II | 6 | - | 1.5 × 10-2 | 2.7 × 10-2 | |||
III | 7 | - | 1.9 × 10-2 | 2.6 × 10-2 | |||
IV | 8 | - | 9.0 × 10-3 | 2.8 × 10-2 | |||
V | 9 | - | 9.8 × 10-3 | 1.6 × 10-2 | |||
VI | 10 | - | 1.24 × 10-2 | 1.96 × 10-2 | |||
VII | 9 | 6 | 9.7 × 10-3 | 1.7 × 10-2 | |||
VIII | 9 | 5 | 2.0 × 10-4 | 3.81 × 10-3 | |||
IX | 8 | 5 | 2.0 × 10-2 | 2.3 × 10-2 | |||
X | 8 | 4 | 7.0 × 10-3 | 1.7 × 10-2 |
Table 3 Mean square error at the end of 1000 epochs during neural network analysis with different number of neurons in first hidden layer (HL 1) or two hidden layers. The cases with only one hidden layer and no second hidden layer, are left with blank spaces for the neurons associated with second hidden layer (HL 2).
Cases | Neurons in HL 1 | Neurons in HL 2 | MSE (Training) | MSE (Validation) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
I | 5 | - | 2.3 × 10-2 | 1.8 × 10-2 | |||
II | 6 | - | 1.5 × 10-2 | 2.7 × 10-2 | |||
III | 7 | - | 1.9 × 10-2 | 2.6 × 10-2 | |||
IV | 8 | - | 9.0 × 10-3 | 2.8 × 10-2 | |||
V | 9 | - | 9.8 × 10-3 | 1.6 × 10-2 | |||
VI | 10 | - | 1.24 × 10-2 | 1.96 × 10-2 | |||
VII | 9 | 6 | 9.7 × 10-3 | 1.7 × 10-2 | |||
VIII | 9 | 5 | 2.0 × 10-4 | 3.81 × 10-3 | |||
IX | 8 | 5 | 2.0 × 10-2 | 2.3 × 10-2 | |||
X | 8 | 4 | 7.0 × 10-3 | 1.7 × 10-2 |
Fig. 12. Mean square error (MSE) values from the neural network analysis of training and validation data for a total of 1000 epochs using 9 neurons in the first hidden layer and 5 neurons in the second hidden layer.
Fig. 13. Jackson parameters estimated from machine learning for different solder alloys at (a) P = 30 W, (b) P = 40 W and (c) P = 50 W. The dotted horizontal lines refer to the morphology transition regimes.
Fig. 14. Schematic sketch showing the morphology mapping of IMC in accordance to Jackson parameter. The IMC corresponding to the curve lying in the yellow region has prismatic morphology, whereas Cu6Sn5 within the curve for light pink region has scalloped morphology.
Fig. 15. Material design chart established from this study that shows the optimized values of Vscan,cr as markers of the Cu6Sn5 IMC morphology transition. For a given laser input power and solder alloy type mentioned in the chart, the IMC has scalloped morphology at Vscan > Vscan,cr, whereas at Vscan < Vscan,cr, it has prismatic morphology.
Solder type | P = 30 W | P = 40 W | P = 50 W |
---|---|---|---|
Pure Sn | 21.0 | 67.4 | 141.4 |
Sn-0.7Cu | 54.4 | 96.7 | 150.0 |
Sn-3.5Ag | 44.7 | 114.3 | 184.3 |
Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu | 38.5 | 102.5 | 172.2 |
Sn-3.5Ag-0.5Cu | 33.3 | 91.1 | 168.9 |
Sn-3.5Ag-0.7Cu | 10.1 | 64.0 | 127.9 |
Table 4 Optimized values of critical scan speed for a solder composition at a given input power (mm/min).
Solder type | P = 30 W | P = 40 W | P = 50 W |
---|---|---|---|
Pure Sn | 21.0 | 67.4 | 141.4 |
Sn-0.7Cu | 54.4 | 96.7 | 150.0 |
Sn-3.5Ag | 44.7 | 114.3 | 184.3 |
Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu | 38.5 | 102.5 | 172.2 |
Sn-3.5Ag-0.5Cu | 33.3 | 91.1 | 168.9 |
Sn-3.5Ag-0.7Cu | 10.1 | 64.0 | 127.9 |
[1] |
M.Y. Xiong, L. Zhang, J. Mater. Sci. 54 2019 1741-1768.
DOI URL |
[2] |
A. Kunwar, H. Ma, H. Ma, B. Guo, Z. Meng, N. Zhao, M. Huang, J. Mater. Sci. -Mater. El. 27 2016 7699-7706.
DOI URL |
[3] |
J.W. Xian, S.A. Belyakov, M. Ollivier, K. Nogita, H. Yasuda, C.M. Gourlay, Acta Mater. 126 2017 540-551.
DOI URL |
[4] |
M. Yang, M. Li, L. Wang, Y. Fu, J. Kim, L. Weng, J. Electron. Mater. 40 2011 176-188.
DOI URL |
[5] | N.T. Jaya, S.R.A. Idris, M. Ishak,in: M. Awang (Ed.), The Advances in Joining Technology, Springer, 2019, pp. 97-107. |
[6] |
H. Nishikawa, N. Iwata, Mater. Trans. 56 2015 1025-1029.
DOI URL |
[7] | T.J. Nabila, S.R.A. Idris, M. Ishak, IOP Conf. Ser. Mater.Sci. Eng. 238 2017, 012011. |
[8] | T.J. Nabila, S.R.A. Idris, M. Ishak, IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater.Sci. Eng. 469 2019, 012117. |
[9] |
H. Nishikawa, N. Iwata, J. Mater. Process. Technol. 215 2015 6-11.
DOI URL |
[10] |
J. Bian, L. Zhou, X. Wan, C. Zhu, B. Yang, Y.A. Huang, Adv. Electron. Mater. 5 2019, 1800900.
DOI URL |
[11] | H. Lee, C.H.J. Lim, M.J. Low, N. Tham, V.M. Murukeshan, Y.J. Kim, J. Precis. Eng. Manuf.-Green Technol. 4 2017 307-322. |
[12] |
S. Wen, K. Chen, W. Li, Y. Zhou, Q. Wei, Y. Shi, Mater. Des. 175 2019, 107811.
DOI URL |
[13] |
S. Lee, J. Peng, D. Shin, Y.S. Choi, Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 20 2019 972-978.
DOI URL PMID |
[14] |
E. Fereiduni, A. Ghasemi, M. Elbestawi, Mater. Des. 184 2019, 108185.
DOI URL |
[15] |
I. Khadka, Z. Wang, H. Zheng, S. Castagne, J. Micro Nano-Manuf. 7 2019, 024507.
DOI URL |
[16] |
T. Hurtony, B. Balogh, P. Gordon, Micro Nanosyst. 2 2010 178-184.
DOI URL |
[17] |
A. Kunwar, S. Shang, P. Råback, Y. Wang, J. Givernaud, J. Chen, H. Ma, X. Song, N. Zhao, Microelectron. Reliab. 80 2018 55-67.
DOI URL |
[18] |
J. Wang, A.Y. Nobakht, J.D. Blanks, D. Shin, S. Lee, A. Shyam, H. Rezayat, S. Shin, Adv. Theory. Simul. 2 2019, 1800196.
DOI URL |
[19] |
J.J. de Pablo, N.E. Jackson, M.A. Webb, L.Q. Chen, J.E. Moore, D. Morgan, R. Jacobs, T. Pollock, D.G. Schlom, E.S. Toberer, J. Analytis, I. Dabo, D.M. DeLongchamp, G.A. Fiete, G.M. Grason, G. Hautier, Y. Mo, K. Rajan, E.J. Reed, E. Rodriguez, V. Stevanovic, J. Suntivich, K. Thornton, J.C. Zhao, npj Comput. Mater. 5 2019 41.
DOI URL |
[20] |
K.A. Jackson, Prog. Solid State Chem. 4 1967 53-56.
DOI URL |
[21] |
W.K. Choi, S.Y. Jang, J.H. Kim, K.W. Paik, H.M. Lee, J. Mater. Res. 17 2002 597-599.
DOI URL |
[22] |
M. Yang, M. Li, C. Wang, Intermetallics 25 (2012) 86-94.
DOI URL |
[23] |
R. Agarwal, Z. Singh, V. Venugopal, J. Alloys. Compd. 282 1999 231-235.
DOI URL |
[24] |
D. Chattaraj, R.A. Jat, S.C. Parida, R. Agarwal, S. Dash, Thermochim. Acta 614 (2015) 16-20.
DOI URL |
[25] |
H. Flandorfer, U. Saeed, C. Luef, A. Sabbar, H. Ipser, Thermochim. Acta 459 (2007) 34-39.
DOI URL |
[26] |
B. Sundman, U.R. Kattner, M. Palumbo, S.G. Fries, Integr. Mater. Manuf. Innov. 4 2015 1-15.
DOI URL |
[27] |
B. Sundman, U.R. Kattner, C. Sigli, M. Stratmann, R. Le Tellier, M. Palumbo, S.G. Fries, Comput. Mater. Sci. 125 2016 188-196.
DOI URL PMID |
[28] |
C. Morando, O. Fornaro, O. Garbellini, H. Palacio, J. Mater. Sci. -Mater. El. 25 2014 3440-3447.
DOI URL |
[29] | A. Kunwar, J. Givernaud, H. Ma, Z. Meng, S. Shang, Y. Wang, H. Ma, in: K. Bi, S. Liu, S. Zhou (Eds.), 17th International Conference on Electronic Packaging Technology, ICEPT 2016, IEEE, Wuhan, China, 2016, pp. 166-169. |
[30] |
F. Caiazzo, V. Alfieri, Materials 11 (2018) 1506.
DOI URL |
[31] | M. Benton, M.R. Hossan, P.R. Konari, S. Gamagedara, MicromachinesBasel 10 (2019) 123. |
[32] | C. Hamann, H. Kehrer, H.G. Rosen, C. Scherer, in: W. Waidelich (Ed.), Laser in Engineering, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1994, pp. 446-452. |
[33] |
F. Meydaneri, M. Gündüz, M. Özdemir, B. Saatçi, , Met. Mater. Int. 18 2012 77-85.
DOI URL |
[34] |
M. Zhao, L. Zhang, Z.Q. Liu, M.Y. Xiong, L. Sun, Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 20 2019 421-444.
DOI URL PMID |
[35] | T. Siewert, S. Liu, D.R. Smith, M. Juan, C. Madeni, Database for SolderProperties with Emphasis on New Lead-free Solders, Technical Report, 2002. |
[36] |
T. Gancarz, P. Fima, J. Pstrus, J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 23 2014 1524-1529.
DOI URL |
[37] |
T. Gancarz, Z. Moser, W. Gasior, J. Pstrus, H. Henein, Int. J. Thermophys. 32 2011 1210-1233.
DOI URL |
[38] |
W. Gasior, Z. Moser, A. Debski, T. Siewert, Int. J. Thermophys. 31 2010 502-512.
DOI URL |
[39] |
M. Tan, B. Xiufang, X. Xianying, Z. Yanning, G. Jing, S. Baoan, Phys. B 387 (2007) 1-5.
DOI URL |
[40] |
S. Shang, A. Kunwar, J. Yao, H. Ma, Y. Wang, Thin Solid Films 669 (2019) 198-207.
DOI URL |
[41] | M. Malinen, P. Raback, in: I. Kondov, G. Sutmann (Eds.), Multiscale Modelling Methods for Applications in Materials Science: CECAM Tutorial, 16-20 September 2013, Forschungszentrum Julich GmbH, Julich, Germany, 2013, pp. 101-113. |
[42] |
A. Kunwar, B. Guo, S. Shang, P. Råback, Y. Wang, J. Chen, H. Ma, X. Song, N. Zhao, Intermetallics 93 (2018) 186-196.
DOI URL |
[43] |
B. Guo, A. Kunwar, N. Zhao, J. Chen, Y. Wang, H. Ma, Mater. Res. Bull. 99 2018 239-248.
DOI URL |
[44] |
S. Shang, A. Kunwar, J. Yao, Y. Wang, H. Ma, Y. Wang, Met. Mater. Int. 25 2019 499-507.
DOI URL |
[45] |
L. Hou, N. Moelans, J. Derakhshandeh, I. De Wolf, E. Beyne, Sci. Rep. 9 2019 14862.
DOI URL PMID |
[46] |
J. Hektor, M. Ristinmaa, H. Hallberg, S.A. Hall, S. Iyengar, Acta Mater. 108 2016 98-109.
DOI URL |
[47] |
L.K. Aagesen, D. Schwen, K. Ahmed, M.R. Tonks, Comput. Mater. Sci. 140 2017 10-21.
DOI URL |
[48] |
S. Shang, Y. Wang, Y. Wang, H. Ma, A. Kunwar, Microelectron. Eng. 208 2019 47-53.
DOI URL |
[49] |
M.S. Park, R. Arróyave, Comput. Mater. Sci. 50 2011 1692-1700.
DOI URL |
[50] |
D.F. Specht, IEEE Trans. Neural. Netw. 2 1991 568-576.
DOI URL PMID |
[51] |
R. Lanouette, J. Thibault, J.L. Valade, Comput. Chem. Eng. 23 1999 1167-1176.
DOI URL |
[52] | S. Fidan, H. Oktay, S. Polat, S. Ozturk, Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2019 (2019), 3831813. |
[53] |
R. Zhang, J. Li, Q. Li, Y. Qi, Z. Zeng, Y. Qiu, X. Chen, S.K. Kairy, S. Thomas, N. Birbilis, Corros. Sci. 150 2019 268-278.
DOI URL |
[54] | N.H. Christiansen, P.E.T. Voie, O. Winther, J. Høgsberg, J. Appl. Math. 2014 (2014), 759834. |
[55] | M. Abadi, A. Agarwal, P. Barham, E. Brevdo, Z. Chen, C. Citro, G.S. Corrado, A. Davis, J. Dean, M. Devin, S. Ghemawat, I. Goodfellow, A. Harp, G. Irving, M. Isard, R. Jozefowicz, Y. Jia, L. Kaiser, M. Kudlur, J. Levenberg, D. Mané, M. Schuster, R. Monga, S. Moore, D. Murray, C. Olah, J. Shlens, B. Steiner, I. Sutskever, K. Talwar, P. Tucker, V. Vanhoucke, V. Vasudevan, F. Viégas, O. Vinyals, P. Warden, M. Wattenberg, M. Wicke, Y. Yu, X. Zheng, TensorFlow: Large-scale Machine Learning on Heterogeneous Systems, 2015, Software available from tensorflow.org. |
[56] | Chollet F., et al.: Keras. GitHub (2015). GitHub repository. https://keras.io/getting-started/faq/#how-should-i-cite-keras. |
[1] | Xianlong Wang, Jinchuan Jie, Shichao Liu, Zhuangzhuang Dong, Guomao Yin, Tingju Li. Growth mechanism of primary Ti5Si3 phases in special brasses and their effect on wear resistance [J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2021, 61(0): 138-146. |
[2] | Xin Wei, Dongmei Fu, Mindong Chen, Wei Wu, Dequan Wu, Chao Liu. Data mining to effect of key alloying elements on corrosion resistance of low alloy steels in Sanya seawater environmentAlloying Elements [J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2021, 64(0): 222-232. |
[3] | Yao Jiang, Yuehui He, Haiyan Gao. Recent progress in porous intermetallics: Synthesis mechanism, pore structure, and material properties [J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2021, 74(0): 89-104. |
[4] | Liao Yu, Qiaodan Hu, Zongye Ding, Fan Yang, Wenquan Lu, Naifang Zhang, Sheng Cao, Jianguo Li. Effect of cooling rate on the 3D morphology of the proeutectic Al3Ni intermetallic compound formed at the Al/Ni interface after solidification [J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2021, 69(0): 60-68. |
[5] | Kaiming Cheng, Jiaxing Sun, Huixia Xu, Jin Wang, Chengwei Zhan, Reza Ghomashchi, Jixue Zhou, Shouqiu Tang, Lijun Zhang, Yong Du. Diffusion growth of ϕ ternary intermetallic compound in the Mg-Al-Zn alloy system: In-situ observation and modeling [J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2021, 60(0): 222-229. |
[6] | Fu Zhang, Zhu Ma, Taotao Hu, Rui Liu, Qiaofeng Wu, Yu Yue, Hua Zhang, Zheng Xiao, Meng Zhang, Wenfeng Zhang, Xin Chen, Hua Yu. Ultra-smooth CsPbI2Br film via programmable crystallization process for high-efficiency inorganic perovskite solar cells [J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2021, 66(0): 150-156. |
[7] | Wei Hu, Zhongwei Ma, Shude Ji, Qi Song, Mingfei Chen, Wenhui Jiang. Improving the mechanical property of dissimilar Al/Mg hybrid friction stir welding joint by PIO-ANN [J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2020, 53(0): 41-52. |
[8] | Qiang Zhu, Chuanjie Wang, Kai Yang, Gang Chen, Heyong Qin, Peng Zhang. Plastic deformation behavior of a nickel-based superalloy on the mesoscopic scale [J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2020, 40(0): 146-157. |
[9] | Anil Kunwar, Yuri Amorim Coutinho, Johan Hektor, Haitao Ma, Nele Moelans. Integration of machine learning with phase field method to model the electromigration induced Cu6Sn5 IMC growth at anode side Cu/Sn interface [J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2020, 59(0): 203-219. |
[10] | Lei Hu, Fuxin Wang, M.-Sadeeq Balogun, Yexiang Tong. Hollow Co2P/Co-carbon-based hybrids for lithium storage with improved pseudocapacitance and water oxidation anodes [J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2020, 55(0): 203-211. |
[11] | Zongye Ding, Qiaodan Hu, Wenquan Lu, Fan Yang, Yihan Zhou, Naifang Zhang, Sheng Cao, Liao Yu, Jianguo Li. Intergrowth mechanism and morphology prediction of faceted Al3Ni formed during solidification by a spatial geometric model [J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2020, 54(0): 40-47. |
[12] | Qian Yan, Bo Song, Yusheng Shi. Comparative study of performance comparison of AlSi10Mg alloy prepared by selective laser melting and casting [J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2020, 41(0): 199-208. |
[13] | Chunjuan Cui, Cong Wang, Pei Wang, Wei Liu, Yuanyuan Lai, Li Deng, Haijun Su. Microstructure and fracture toughness of the Bridgman directionally solidified Fe-Al-Ta eutectic at different solidification rates [J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2020, 42(0): 63-74. |
[14] | Nersisyan Hayk H., Kwon Suk Cheol, Ri Vladislav E., Kim Wan Bae, Choi Woo Seok, Lee Jong Hyeon. Formation of spherical alloy microparticles in a porous salt medium [J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2020, 43(0): 189-196. |
[15] | X.Y. Jiao, C.F. Liu, Z.P. Guo, G.D. Tong, S.L. Ma, Y. Bi, Y.F. Zhang, S.M. Xiong. The characterization of Fe-rich phases in a high-pressure die cast hypoeutectic aluminum-silicon alloy [J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2020, 51(0): 54-62. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||