J. Mater. Sci. Technol. ›› 2020, Vol. 50: 21-30.DOI: 10.1016/j.jmst.2019.12.032
• Research Article • Previous Articles Next Articles
Seok Gyu Leea, Bohee Kima, Min Cheol Joa, Kyeong-Min Kima, Junghoon Leeb, Jinho Baec, Byeong-Joo Leea, Seok Su Sohn4,*(), Sunghak Leea,*()
Received:
2019-09-10
Revised:
2019-12-20
Accepted:
2019-12-22
Published:
2020-08-01
Online:
2020-08-10
Contact:
Seok Su Sohn,Sunghak Lee
Seok Gyu Lee, Bohee Kim, Min Cheol Jo, Kyeong-Min Kim, Junghoon Lee, Jinho Bae, Byeong-Joo Lee, Seok Su Sohn, Sunghak Lee. Effects of Cr addition on Charpy impact energy in austenitic 0.45C-24Mn-(0,3,6)Cr steels[J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2020, 50: 21-30.
Fig. 1. (a-c) EBSD inverse pole figure (IPF) maps and (d) XRD profiles of the 0Cr, 3Cr, and 6Cr steels. The average austenite grain sizes (Dγ) are ranged from 20 to 24 μm in the three steels, indicating the almost same austenitic microstructures.
Fig. 2. EPMA (a-c) Mn- and (d, e) Cr-distribution maps of the 0Cr, 3Cr, and 6Cr steels. Mn-rich and Mn-depleted areas exist in a banded shape in the three steels, and the Cr distribution of the 3Cr and 6Cr steels shows a similar trend of the Mn distribution.
Steel | Overall Matrix | High-(Mn,Cr) Band | Low-(Mn,Cr) Band | |
---|---|---|---|---|
0Cr | Mn | 23.9 ± 0.10 | 25.8 ± 0.66 | 22.5 ± 0.89 |
Cr | - | - | - | |
3Cr | Mn | 24.0 ± 0.07 | 25.5 ± 0.52 | 22.4 ± 0.91 |
Cr | 3.1 ± 0.11 | 3.20 ± 0.01 | 2.86 ± 0.02 | |
6Cr | Mn | 24.0 ± 0.05 | 25.6 ± 0.80 | 22.7 ± 0.96 |
Cr | 5.9 ± 0.08 | 6.41 ± 0.10 | 5.65 ± 0.15 |
Table 1 Mn and Cr contents in overall matrix, high-(Mn,Cr) band, and low-(Mn,Cr) band of the Cr-added austenitic high-Mn steels (wt%).
Steel | Overall Matrix | High-(Mn,Cr) Band | Low-(Mn,Cr) Band | |
---|---|---|---|---|
0Cr | Mn | 23.9 ± 0.10 | 25.8 ± 0.66 | 22.5 ± 0.89 |
Cr | - | - | - | |
3Cr | Mn | 24.0 ± 0.07 | 25.5 ± 0.52 | 22.4 ± 0.91 |
Cr | 3.1 ± 0.11 | 3.20 ± 0.01 | 2.86 ± 0.02 | |
6Cr | Mn | 24.0 ± 0.05 | 25.6 ± 0.80 | 22.7 ± 0.96 |
Cr | 5.9 ± 0.08 | 6.41 ± 0.10 | 5.65 ± 0.15 |
Fig. 3. (a, b) Engineering tensile stress-strain curves and (c, d) true stress-strain curves obtained from the tensile test at 25 and -196 °C. The yield strength increases as Cr is added into the 0Cr steel, while the tensile strength is hardly varied within error ranges. The yield and tensile strengths at -196 °C are much higher than those at 25 °C, but the elongation is similar.
Temperature | Steel | Yield strength (MPa) | Tensile strength (MPa) | Elongation (%) | Charpy impact energy (J) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
25 °C | 0Cr | 394 ± 14 | 877 ± 17 | 87.5 ± 2.5 | 259 ± 2 |
3Cr | 443 ± 5 | 880 ± 4 | 79.3 ± 2.8 | 249 ± 3 | |
6Cr | 479 ± 10 | 883 ± 2 | 73.9 ± 1.5 | 234 ± 7 | |
-196 °C | 0Cr | 710 ± 10 | 1431 ± 12 | 83.0 ± 1.8 | 62 ± 5 |
3Cr | 863 ± 11 | 1459 ± 4 | 78.9 ± 1.5 | 123 ± 8 | |
6Cr | 924 ± 25 | 1471 ± 26 | 74.5 ± 0.9 | 146 ± 2 |
Table 2 Tensile and Charpy impact test data at 25 and -196 °C for the austenitic high-Mn steels.
Temperature | Steel | Yield strength (MPa) | Tensile strength (MPa) | Elongation (%) | Charpy impact energy (J) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
25 °C | 0Cr | 394 ± 14 | 877 ± 17 | 87.5 ± 2.5 | 259 ± 2 |
3Cr | 443 ± 5 | 880 ± 4 | 79.3 ± 2.8 | 249 ± 3 | |
6Cr | 479 ± 10 | 883 ± 2 | 73.9 ± 1.5 | 234 ± 7 | |
-196 °C | 0Cr | 710 ± 10 | 1431 ± 12 | 83.0 ± 1.8 | 62 ± 5 |
3Cr | 863 ± 11 | 1459 ± 4 | 78.9 ± 1.5 | 123 ± 8 | |
6Cr | 924 ± 25 | 1471 ± 26 | 74.5 ± 0.9 | 146 ± 2 |
Fig. 4. SEM fractographs of the tensile specimens of the (a, d) 0Cr, (b, e) 3Cr, and (c, f) 6Cr steels fractured at 25 and -196 °C. The surfaces fractured at 25 and -196 °C consist mostly of ductile dimples in all the steels.
Fig. 5. Charpy impact energy as a function of test temperature for the three high-Mn steels. The absorbed energies at 25 °C are very high over 230 J in the three steels, and decreases as the Cr content increases. They gradually decrease with decreasing temperature to -196 °C. At -196 °C, the absorbed energy increases as the Cr content increases, which is opposite to the energy data at 25 °C.
Fig. 6. SEM fractographs of the near-notch-tip area of the Charpy impact specimen of the (a, d) 0Cr, (b, e) 3Cr, and (c, f) 6Cr steels fractured at 25 and -196 °C. The surfaces fractured at 25 and -196 °C consist mostly of ductile dimples in all the steels. It is noted that a few quasi-cleavage facets having river patterns are found in the 0Cr steel (arrow marks in (d)).
Fig. 7. EBSD IPF and (IQ + Phase) maps of the half-sectioned notch-tip area of the Charpy impact specimen fractured at -196 °C for the (a, d) 0Cr, (b, e) 3Cr, and (c, f) 6Cr steels. Many twins are populated in the three steels (arrow marks in Fig. 7(a-f)). When a red-dashed box area in (d) is magnified (g, h), fine particles are found in the 0Cr steel (red-colors in (h). These particles are identified to be ε-martensite because they well satisfy the Shoji-Nishiyama (S-N) orientation relationship, {111}γ//{0002}ε and < 101 >γ//< $11\bar{2}0$ >ε as shown in (i, j), which implies the existence of ε-martensite in the plastic zone formed near the notch-tip area.
Fig. 8. Dynamic compressive stress-strain curves at (a) 25 and (b) -196 °C. The yield and maximum compressive strengths at -196 °C are higher than those at 25 °C, while the plastic strain is similar. As Cr is added, the yield and maximum strengths increase at -196 °C, while the plastic strain hardly vary.
Temperature | Steel | Yield strength (MPa) | Maximum strength (MPa) | Plastic strain (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
25 °C | 0Cr | 682 ± 2 | 2590 ± 32 | 37.5 ± 6.9 |
3Cr | 781 ± 5 | 2520 ± 1 | 36.3 ± 2.7 | |
6Cr | 837 ± 3 | 2642 ± 7 | 35.7 ± 2.6 | |
-196 °C | 0Cr | 1194 ± 11 | 2957 ± 14 | 33.9 ± 0.1 |
3Cr | 1446 ± 9 | 3164 ± 8 | 33.0 ± 2.5 | |
6Cr | 1530 ± 4 | 3191 ± 23 | 32.7 ± 1.4 |
Table 3 Dynamic compressive test data at 25 and -196 °C for the austenitic high-Mn steels.
Temperature | Steel | Yield strength (MPa) | Maximum strength (MPa) | Plastic strain (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
25 °C | 0Cr | 682 ± 2 | 2590 ± 32 | 37.5 ± 6.9 |
3Cr | 781 ± 5 | 2520 ± 1 | 36.3 ± 2.7 | |
6Cr | 837 ± 3 | 2642 ± 7 | 35.7 ± 2.6 | |
-196 °C | 0Cr | 1194 ± 11 | 2957 ± 14 | 33.9 ± 0.1 |
3Cr | 1446 ± 9 | 3164 ± 8 | 33.0 ± 2.5 | |
6Cr | 1530 ± 4 | 3191 ± 23 | 32.7 ± 1.4 |
Fig. 9. IPF and IQ maps of the half-sectioned area of the dynamically compressed specimen at 25 °C for the (a, b) 0Cr, (c, d) 3Cr, and (e, f) 6Cr steels. In all the steels, twins are populated (arrow marks) without any martensite. Misorientation-angle distributions of austenite grains are shown in (g-i). Number fractions at the misorientation angle indicating twin boundaries (60°) are 6.3%, 4.2%, and 2.7% in the 0Cr, 3Cr, and 6Cr steels, respectively, which indicates the active twinning with decreasing Cr addition.
Fig. 10. EBSD (IQ+Phase) maps and EPMA Mn distribution maps of the half-sectioned area of the specimen dynamically-compressed at strains of 10% and 20% at -196 °C for the (a) 0Cr, (b) 3Cr, and (c) 6Cr steels. When the 10%-strain was applied to the 0Cr steel, the ε-martensite is observed, and its amount increases with increasing strain to 20%. Its volume fractions (Vε) were measured, and are indicated inside the maps. According to the Mn distribution map, the ε-martensite forms mostly along low-Mn bands.
Temperaute | Steel | Overall Matrix | High-(Mn,Cr) Band | Low-(Mn,Cr) Band |
---|---|---|---|---|
25 °C | 0Cr | 27.2 | 28.7 | 25.7 |
3Cr | 31.8 | 32.9 | 30.4 | |
6Cr | 36.5 | 37.4 | 35.5 | |
-196 °C | 0Cr | 23.0 | 26.4 | 20.0 |
3Cr | 26.2 | 28.8 | 23.4 | |
6Cr | 29.3 | 31.8 | 27.1 |
Table 4 Calculated stacking fault energy in overall matrix, high-(Mn,Cr) band, and low-(Mn,Cr) band of the Cr-added austenitic high-Mn steels (mJ m-2).
Temperaute | Steel | Overall Matrix | High-(Mn,Cr) Band | Low-(Mn,Cr) Band |
---|---|---|---|---|
25 °C | 0Cr | 27.2 | 28.7 | 25.7 |
3Cr | 31.8 | 32.9 | 30.4 | |
6Cr | 36.5 | 37.4 | 35.5 | |
-196 °C | 0Cr | 23.0 | 26.4 | 20.0 |
3Cr | 26.2 | 28.8 | 23.4 | |
6Cr | 29.3 | 31.8 | 27.1 |
Fig. 11. Fractions of equilibrium phases (liquid, austenite, ferrite, and M23C6 carbide) of the (a) 0Cr, (b) 3Cr, and (c) 6Cr steels. SEM images of the (d) 0Cr, (e) 3Cr, and (f) 6Cr steels, supporting that the M23C6 carbide is hardly observed for the Cr-added steels.
[1] | M.I. Hoffert, K. Caldeira, A.K. Jain, E.F. Haites, L.D. Danny Harvey, S.D. Potter, M.E. Schlesinger, S.H. Schneider, R.G. Watts, T.M.L. Wigley, D.J. Wuebbles, Nature 395 (1998) 881-884. |
[2] |
Y. Kimura, T. Inoue, F. Yin, K. Tsuzaki, Science 320 (2008) 1057-1060.
DOI URL PMID |
[3] | V.E. Panin, L.S. Derevyagina, N.M. Lemeshev, A.V. Korznikov, A.V. Panin, M.S. Kazachenok, Phys. Mesomech. 17 2014 89-96. |
[4] | E.D. Marquardt, J.P. Le, R. Radebaugh, Cyocoolers 11 (2002) 681-687. |
[5] | J.K. Choi, S.G. Lee, Y.H. Park, I.W. Han, J.W. Morris Jr., Int. Soc. Offshore Polar Eng. (2012) 29-35. |
[6] | J.W. Morris Jr, S.K. Hwang, K.A. Yushchenko, V.I. Belotzerkovertz, O.G. Kvasnevskii, Adv. Cryog. Eng. 24 1978 91-102. |
[7] | G. Frommeyer, U. Brüx, P. Neumann, ISIJ Int. 43 2003 438-446. |
[8] | S.S. Sohn, S. Hong, J. Lee, B.C. Suh, S.K. Kim, B.J. Lee, N.J. Kim, S. Lee, Acta Mater. 100 2015 39-52. |
[9] | H. Kim, Y. Ha, K.H. Kwon, M. Kang, N.J. Kim, S. Lee, Acta Mater. 87 2015 332-343. |
[10] |
G. Dini, A. Najafizadeh, R. Ueji, S.M. Monir-Vaghefi, Mater. Des. 31 2010 3395-3402.
DOI URL |
[11] |
N.R. Tao, X.L. Wu, M.L. Sui, J. Lu, K. Lu, J. Mater. Res. 19 2004 1623-1629.
DOI URL |
[12] | N.H. Heo, Y.U. Heo, S.K. Kwon, N.J. Kim, S.J. Kim, H.C. Lee, Met. Mater. Int. 24 2018 265-281. |
[13] | J.U. Lee, S.H. Kim, W.K. Jo, W.H. Hong, W. Kim, J.H. Bae, S.H. Park, Met. Mater. Int. 24 2018 730-737. |
[14] | O. Bouaziz, S. Allain, C. Scott, Scr. Mater. 58 2008 484-487. |
[15] | A. Saeed-Akbari, J. Imlau, U. Prahl, W. Bleck, Metall. Mater. Trans. A 40 (2009) 3076-3090. |
[16] | T. Shun, C.M. Wan, J.G. Byrne, Acta Metall. 40 1992 3407-3412. |
[17] | B.K. Zuidema, D.K. Subramanyam, W.C. Leslie, Metall. Trans. A 18 (1987) 1629-1639. |
[18] | H. Lee, M.C. Jo, S.S. Sohn, S.H. Kim, T. Song, S.K. Kim, H.S. Kim, N.J. Kim, S. Lee, Mater. Charact. 147 2019 233-241. |
[19] | R. Miura, H. Nakajima, Y. Takahashi, K. Yoshida, Adv. Cryog. Eng. Mater. 30 1984 245-252. |
[20] | X.J. Wang, X.J. Sun, C. Song, H. Chen, W. Han, F. Pan, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 698 (2017) 110-116. |
[21] | L. Bracke, J. Penning, N. Akdut, Metall. Mater. Trans. A 38 (2007) 520-528. |
[22] | X. Yuan, Y. Zhao, X. Li, L. Chen, J. Mater, Sci. Technol. 33 2017 1555-1560. |
[23] | L. Remy, A. Pineau, Mater. Sci. Eng. 28 1977 99-107. |
[24] | S. Liu, L. Qian, J. Meng, D. Li, P. Ma, F. Zhang, Scr. Mater. 127 2017 10-14. |
[25] | S.J. Lee, H. Fujii, K. Ushioda, J. Alloys. Compd. 749 2018 776-782. |
[26] | T. Tsuchiyama, H. Ito, K. Kataoka, S. Takaki, Metall. Mater. Trans. A 34 (2003) 2591-2599. |
[27] | Q. Luo, H.H. Wang, G.Q. Li, C. Sun, D.H. Li, X.L. Wan, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 753 (2019) 91-98. |
[28] | E.D.H. Davies, S.C. Hunter, J. Mech, Phys. Solids 11 (1963) 155-179. |
[29] | W. Chen, B. Song, Split Hopkinson (Kolsky) Bar-Design, Testing, and Applications, Springer, New York, 2011. |
[30] | H. Lee, J.H. Choi, M.C. Jo, I. Jo, S.K. Lee, S. Lee, Met. Mater. Int. 24 2018 894-903. |
[31] | G. Krauss, Metall. Mater. Trans. B 34 (2003) 781-792. |
[32] | Z. Wu, H. Bei, G.M. Pharr, E.P. George, Acta Mater. 81 2014 428-441. |
[33] | C. Chen, F.C. Zhang, F. Wang, H. Liu, B.D. Yu, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 679 (2017) 95-103. |
[34] | R.L. Klueh, Mater. Sci. Eng. 35 1978 239-253. |
[35] | Y. Feng, R. Song, Z. Pei, R. Song, G. Dou, Met. Mater. Int. 24 2018 1012-1023. |
[36] | A.A. Saleh, E.V. Pereloma, A.A. Gazder, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 528 (2011) 4537-4549. |
[37] | S. Ratanaphan, Y. Yoon, G.S. Rohrer, J. Mater. Sci. 49 2014 4938-4945. |
[38] | A.A. Gazder, A.A. Saleh, E.V. Pereloma, Scr. Mater. 65 2011 560-563. |
[39] | H. Kim, M. Kang, H.J. Jung, H.S. Kim, C.M. Bae, S. Lee, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 571 (2013) 38-48. |
[40] |
H. Song, D.G. Kim, D.W. Kim, M.C. Jo, Y.H. Jo, W. Kim, H.S. Kim, B.J. Lee, S. Lee, Sci. Rep. 9 2019 6163.
DOI URL PMID |
[41] | S. Curtze, V.T. Kuokkala, A. Oikari, J. Talonen, J. Häninen, Acta Mater. 59 2011 1068-1076. |
[42] | S. Curtze, V.T. Kuokkala, Acta Mater. 58 2010 5129-5141. |
[43] | G.B. Olson, M. Cohen, Metall. Trans. A 7 (1976) 1897-1904. |
[44] | S. Allain, J.P. Chateau, O. Bouaziz, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 387 (2004) 143-147. |
[45] |
Y. Tomota, M. Strum, J.W. Morris, Metall. Trans. A 17 (1986) 537-547.
DOI URL |
[46] | H. Kim, J. Park, J.E. Jung, S.S. Sohn, S. Lee, Mater. Sic. Eng. A 641 (2015) 340-347. |
[47] |
J.O. Andersson, T. Helander, L. Hoglund, P. Shi, B. Sundman, Calphad 26 (2002) 273-312.
DOI URL |
[48] |
B. Sundman, B. Jansson, J.O. Andersson, Calphad 9 (1985) 153-190.
DOI URL |
[49] | B.J. Lee, B. Sundman, Sweden, 1999. |
[50] | K.G. Chin, H.J. Lee, J.H. Kwak, J.Y. Kang, B.J. Lee, J. Alloys. Compd. 505 2010 217-223. |
[51] | E. Kozeschnik, J. Svoboda, F.D. Fischer, Calphad 28 (2004) 379-382. |
[52] | E. Kozeschnik, J. Svoboda, P. Fratzl, F.D. Fischer, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 385 (2004) 157-165. |
[1] | Yong Hee Jo, Junha Yang, Won-Mi Choi, Kyung-Yeon Doh, Donghwa Lee, Hyoung Seop Kim, Byeong-Joo Lee, Seok Su Sohn, Sunghak Lee. Body-centered-cubic martensite and the role on room-temperature tensile properties in Si-added SiVCrMnFeCo high-entropy alloys [J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2021, 76(0): 222-230. |
[2] | Ran Wei, Kaisheng Zhang, Liangbin Chen, Zhenhua Han, Tan Wang, Chen Chen, Jianzhong Jiang, Tingwei Hu, Fushan Li. Novel Co-free high performance TRIP and TWIP medium-entropy alloys at cryogenic temperatures [J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2020, 57(0): 153-158. |
[3] | K.S. Arora S. Pandey M. Schaper R. Kumar. Microstructure Evolution during Friction Stir Welding of Aluminum Alloy AA2219 [J]. J Mater Sci Technol, 2010, 26(8): 747-753. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||