J. Mater. Sci. Technol. ›› 2020, Vol. 45: 230-240.DOI: 10.1016/j.jmst.2019.11.024
• Research Article • Previous Articles Next Articles
C.Q. Liua,b, C. Hea, H.W. Chena,c,*(), J.F. Niea,b,c,*()
Received:
2019-09-04
Revised:
2019-11-14
Accepted:
2019-11-17
Published:
2020-05-15
Online:
2020-05-27
Contact:
H.W. Chen,J.F. Nie
C.Q. Liu, C. He, H.W. Chen, J.F. Nie. Precipitation on stacking faults in Mg-9.8wt%Sn alloy[J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2020, 45: 230-240.
Fig. 1. (a) Schematic illustration of α-Mg lattice and Burgers vectors of dislocations. (b-d) perspective views of α-Mg lattice along (b) [0001]α, (c) [2 $\bar{1}$$\bar{1}$0]α and (d) [10 $\bar{1}$0]α. a0, a60 and $\text{a}_{60}^{'}$ represent Burgers vectors of three a perfect dislocations, c is Burgers vector of a c perfect dislocation, c +a0, c +a60 and c + $\text{a}_{60}^{'}$ represent Burgers vectors of three c + a perfect dislocations, s90, s30 and $\text{s}_{30}^{'}$ represent Burgers vectors of three Shockley partial dislocations, f90, f30 and $\text{f}_{30}^{'}$ represent Burgers vectors of three Frank partial dislocations with Shockley component, and c/2 represents Burgers vector of the Frank partial dislocation without Shockley component.
Dislocations | Perfect dislocations | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
a0 | a60 | $\text{a}_{60}^{'}$ | c | c+a0 | c+a60 | c+ $\text{a}_{60}^{'}$ | ||||||
Miller indices of Burgers vectors | 1/3[2$\bar{1}$$\bar{1}$0]α | 1/3[ | 1/3[ | [000$\bar{1}$]α | 1/3[2$\bar{1}$$\bar{1}$3-]α | 1/3[ | 1/3[ | |||||
Projection of Burgers vector on (2$\bar{1}$$\bar{1}$0)α | 0 | 1/2[0$\bar{1}$10]α | 1/2[01$\bar{1}$0]α | [000$\bar{1}$]α | [000$\bar{1}$]α | 1/2[0$\bar{1}$12-]α | 1/2[01$\bar{1}$2-]α | |||||
Projection of Burgers vector on (10$\bar{1}$0)α | 1/6[ | 1/3[ | 1/6[$\bar{1}$2$\bar{1}$0]α | [000$\bar{1}$]α | 1/6[ | 1/3[ | 1/6[$\bar{1}$2$\bar{1}$6-]α | |||||
Magnitude of Burgers vectors | a | a | a | c | $\sqrt{a^{2}+c^{2}}$ | $\sqrt{a^{2}+c^{2}}$ | $\sqrt{a^{2}+c^{2}}$ | |||||
Dislocations | Partial dislocations | |||||||||||
s90 | s30 | $\text{s}_{30}^{'}$ | c/2 | f90 | f30 | $\text{f}_{30}^{'}$ | ||||||
Miller indices of Burgers vectors | 1/3[0$\bar{1}$10]α | 1/3[1$\bar{1}$00]α | 1/3[$\bar{1}$010]α | 1/2[000$\bar{1}$]α | 1/6[ | 1/6[ | 1/6[ | |||||
Projection of Burgers vector on (2$\bar{1}$$\bar{1}$0)α | 1/3[0$\bar{1}$10]α | 1/6[0$\bar{1}$10]α | 1/6[0$\bar{1}$10]α | 1/2[000$\bar{1}$]α | 1/6[ | 1/6[0$\bar{1}$13-]α | 1/6[01$\bar{1}$3-]α | |||||
Projection of Burgers vector on (10$\bar{1}$0)α | 1/6[ | 1/6[ | 0 | 1/2[000$\bar{1}$]α | 1/6[ | 1/6[ | 1/2[000$\bar{1}$]α | |||||
Magnitude of Burgers vectors | a/$\sqrt{3}$ | a/$\sqrt{3}$ | a/$\sqrt{3}$ | c/2 | $\sqrt{a^{2}/3+c^{2}}/4$ | $\sqrt{a^{2}/3+c^{2}}/4$ | $\sqrt{a^{2}/3+c^{2}}/4$ |
Table 1 Burgers vectors of perfect and partial dislocations in magnesium shown in Fig. 1.
Dislocations | Perfect dislocations | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
a0 | a60 | $\text{a}_{60}^{'}$ | c | c+a0 | c+a60 | c+ $\text{a}_{60}^{'}$ | ||||||
Miller indices of Burgers vectors | 1/3[2$\bar{1}$$\bar{1}$0]α | 1/3[ | 1/3[ | [000$\bar{1}$]α | 1/3[2$\bar{1}$$\bar{1}$3-]α | 1/3[ | 1/3[ | |||||
Projection of Burgers vector on (2$\bar{1}$$\bar{1}$0)α | 0 | 1/2[0$\bar{1}$10]α | 1/2[01$\bar{1}$0]α | [000$\bar{1}$]α | [000$\bar{1}$]α | 1/2[0$\bar{1}$12-]α | 1/2[01$\bar{1}$2-]α | |||||
Projection of Burgers vector on (10$\bar{1}$0)α | 1/6[ | 1/3[ | 1/6[$\bar{1}$2$\bar{1}$0]α | [000$\bar{1}$]α | 1/6[ | 1/3[ | 1/6[$\bar{1}$2$\bar{1}$6-]α | |||||
Magnitude of Burgers vectors | a | a | a | c | $\sqrt{a^{2}+c^{2}}$ | $\sqrt{a^{2}+c^{2}}$ | $\sqrt{a^{2}+c^{2}}$ | |||||
Dislocations | Partial dislocations | |||||||||||
s90 | s30 | $\text{s}_{30}^{'}$ | c/2 | f90 | f30 | $\text{f}_{30}^{'}$ | ||||||
Miller indices of Burgers vectors | 1/3[0$\bar{1}$10]α | 1/3[1$\bar{1}$00]α | 1/3[$\bar{1}$010]α | 1/2[000$\bar{1}$]α | 1/6[ | 1/6[ | 1/6[ | |||||
Projection of Burgers vector on (2$\bar{1}$$\bar{1}$0)α | 1/3[0$\bar{1}$10]α | 1/6[0$\bar{1}$10]α | 1/6[0$\bar{1}$10]α | 1/2[000$\bar{1}$]α | 1/6[ | 1/6[0$\bar{1}$13-]α | 1/6[01$\bar{1}$3-]α | |||||
Projection of Burgers vector on (10$\bar{1}$0)α | 1/6[ | 1/6[ | 0 | 1/2[000$\bar{1}$]α | 1/6[ | 1/6[ | 1/2[000$\bar{1}$]α | |||||
Magnitude of Burgers vectors | a/$\sqrt{3}$ | a/$\sqrt{3}$ | a/$\sqrt{3}$ | c/2 | $\sqrt{a^{2}/3+c^{2}}/4$ | $\sqrt{a^{2}/3+c^{2}}/4$ | $\sqrt{a^{2}/3+c^{2}}/4$ |
Fig. 2. (a) HAADF-STEM image showing an I1 stacking fault that has been generated by dissociation of a c +a60 dislocation in a sample that was cold rolled by 8 % and aged at room temperature for 96 h. (b, c) Enlarged HAADF-STEM images showing the left and right ends of the I1 fault in (a). I to III represent different Burgers circuits. I in (a) shows a c +a60 dislocation. II and III in (b, c) show a f30 partial and a f90 partial bounding the left and right ends of the I1, respectively. Symbol ⊥ represents a partial dislocation. The stacking sequence associated with I1 is indicated by yellow letters. S and F represent the start and finish points of Burgers circuits, respectively. Arrow pointing from S to F in each Burgers circuit represents the direction of the Burgers vector. Electron beam is parallel to [2 $\bar{1}$$\bar{1}$ 0]α.
Fig. 3. (a) HAADF-STEM images showing the precipitation of a small β′ at the right end of an I1 fault that has been generated by dissociation of a c +a0 in a sample that was cold rolled by 8 % and aged at room temperature for 96 h. (b, c) Enlarged HAADF-STEM images showing the left and right ends of the fault in (a). I to V represent different Burgers circuits. I in (a) shows a c +a0, and II and III in (b, c) show a $\text{f}_{30}^{'}$ and a f30 bounding the left and right ends of the I1, respectively. IV and V in (c) show a s30 and a c/2 bounding the left and right ends of the five-layer β′, respectively. The stacking sequences associated with I1 and β′ are indicated by yellow letters. Electron beam is parallel to [2 $\bar{1}$$\bar{1}$ 0]α.
Fig. 4. (a) HAADF-STEM image showing the I1 stacking fault shown in Fig. 3(a) but viewed along the [10 $\bar{1}$ 0]α zone axis. (b, c) Enlarged HAADF-STEM images showing the left and right ends of the fault in (a). I to V represent different Burgers circuits. I in (a) shows a c +a0, and II and III in (b, c) show a $\text{f}_{30}^{'}$ and a f30 bounding the left and right ends of the I1, respectively. IV and V in (c) show a s30 and a c/2 bounding the left and right ends of the five-layer β′, respectively. Electron beam is parallel to [10 $\bar{1}$ 0]α.
Fig. 5. HAADF-STEM image showing a five-layer β′ precipitate in a sample that was cold rolled by 8 % and aged at 160 °C for 90 h. I to III represent different Burgers circuits. I shows a c. II and III show two c/2. The stacking sequence of β′ is indicated by yellow letters. Electron beam is parallel to [2 $\bar{1}$$\bar{1}$ 0]α.
Fig. 6. HAADF-STEM images showing three β′ precipitates with (a) seven layers, (b) nine layers and (c) eleven layers in thickness in a sample that were cold rolled by 8 % and aged at 160 °C for 90 h. I to III represent different Burgers circuits. These Burgers circuits show the Burgers vector at the end of β′ in (a-c). Electron beam is parallel to [2 $\bar{1}$$\bar{1}$ 0]α.
Fig. 7. HAADF-STEM images showing the precipitation of β′ on I2 stacking fault. (a) An I2 fault that has been generated by the dissociation of an a60 in a sample that was cold rolled by 8 % and aged at room temperature for 96 h. (b) Sn segregation around an I2 fault and (c) precipitation of a four-layer β′ on an I2 fault in a sample that was cold rolled by 8 % and aged at 120 °C for 73 h. I to III in (a-c) represent different Burgers circuits. I in (a-c) shows an a60. II and III in (a-c) show a s30 and a s90 respectively. The stacking sequences associated with I2 and β′ are indicated by yellow letters. Numbers 1-4 represent the serial number of each layer in β′. Electron beam is parallel to [2 $\bar{1}$$\bar{1}$ 0]α.
Fig. 8. HAADF-STEM images showing a six-layer β′ precipitate in a sample that was cold rolled by 8 % and aged at 120 °C for 73 h. Different Burgers circuit analyses are shown in (a) and (b). I to VI represent different Burgers circuits. I and II in (a) show an a60. I to VI in (b) show Shockley partials. The stacking sequence of β′ is indicated by yellow letters. Numbers 1-6 represent the serial number of each layer in β′. Electron beam is parallel to [2 $\bar{1}$$\bar{1}$ 0]α.
Fig. 9. HAADF-STEM images showing an eight-layer β′ precipitate in a sample that was cold rolled by 8 % and aged at 160 °C for 90 h. Different Burgers circuit analyses are shown in (a) and (b). I to VIII represent different Burgers circuits. I in (a) shows no dislocation, whereas both II and III in (a) show an a60. I to III and VI to VIII in (b) show Shockley partials at the left and right ends of β′. IV and V in (b) show the combination of Shockley partials at each of the two ends. The stacking sequence of β′ is indicated by yellow letters. Numbers 1-8 represent the serial number of each layer in β′. Electron beam is parallel to [2 $\bar{1}$$\bar{1}$ 0]α.
Fig. 10. Schematic diagrams showing the precipitation of a five-layer β′ structure on an I1 fault that has been generated by the dissociation of c +a60. (a) An I1 fault bounded by a f90 and a f30 at its left and right ends, respectively. (b) The formation of a β′ structure that is produced by a shear with the direction and magnitude of s30 at the right end of the I1. (c) Growth of the β′ to the left end of the I1, and (d) s30 bounding the lengthening end of the β′ reacting with f90 to reproduce an a60 and a c/2 and the a60 dislocation glides away from the β′. Red dashed and solid line frames represent the shape changes during the formation and growth processes of β′ in (a-c). Green frame in (d) represents the shape change caused by gliding away of a60. Symbol ⊥ represents a partial or a perfect dislocation. A, B and C represent the stacking sequence of the closely-packed planes.
Fig. 11. Schematic diagrams showing the precipitation of a five-layer β′ structure on an I1 fault that has been generated by removing a closely-packed plane B, and shearing the planes above the removed plane by a displacement of -$\text{s}_{30}^{'}$. (a) An I1 fault bounded by a $\text{f}_{30}^{'}$ at its left end and a - $\text{f}_{30}^{'}$ at its right end. (b) The formation of a five-layer β′ structure that is produced by a shear with the direction and magnitude of $\text{s}_{30}^{'}$ at the right end of the I1. (c) Growth of the β′ to the left end of the I1. (d) $\text{s}_{30}^{'}$bounding the lengthening end of the β′ reacting with $\text{f}_{30}^{'}$ to produce a c/2. Red dashed line and solid line frames represent the shape changes during the whole process. Symbol ⊥ represents a partial dislocation.
Fig. 12. Schematic diagrams showing (a) an I2 fault that has been produced by dissociating an a60 and bounded by s90 and s30, at its two ends, (b) the shape changes when a four-layer β′ formed on the I2 fault in (a) is thickened to eight layers by combining two shears with the directions and magnitudes of - $\text{s}_{30}^{'}$ and s90, and (c) further dissociation of s90 bounding the left end of the β′ on the seventh layer in (b) into an a60 and a - s30 and the a60 gliding away from the β′. Red dashed line frames in (a) represent the shape changes caused by the dissociation of a60, red solid line frames in (b) represent the shape changes caused by the shears. Green frame in (c) represents the shape change caused by gliding away the a60. Black dashed line frame in (a-c) represents the shape that introduces no shear strain to its surrounding matrix. Red arrow represents the shear direction. Symbol ⊥ represents a partial or a perfect dislocation.
Fig. 13. Schematic diagrams showing (a) an I2 fault that has been produced by shearing a part of the hcp lattice by - s30 and bounded by s30 and - s30 at its two ends, and (b) the shape changes when a four-layer β′ formed on the I2 fault in (a) is thickened to eight-layer by combining - $\text{s}_{30}^{'}$ and s90 shears. Red dashed line frames in (a) indicate the shape change caused by the formation of I2 fault, and red solid line frames in (b) represent the shape changes caused by the shears. Black dashed line frame in (a, b) represents the shape that introduces no shear strain to its surrounding matrix. Red arrow represents the shear direction. Symbol ⊥ represents a partial dislocation.
[1] | T.T. Sasaki, F.R. Elsayed, T. Nakata, T. Ohkubo, S. Kamado, K. Hono, Acta Mater. 99 (2015) 176-186. |
[2] | X.F. Huang, W.Z. Zhang, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 552 (2012) 211-221. |
[3] | T.T. Sasaki, K. Oh-ishi, T. Ohkubo, K. Hono, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 530 (2011) 1-8. |
[4] | K. Hono, C.L. Mendis, T.T. Sasaki, K. Oh-ishi, Scr.Mater. 63 (2010) 710-715. |
[5] | T.T. Sasaki, J.D. Ju, K. Hono, K.S. Shin, Scr. Mater. 61 (2009) 80-83. |
[6] | T.T. Sasaki, K. Yamamoto, T. Honma, S. Kamado, K. Hono, Scr. Mater. 59 (2008) 1111-1114. |
[7] | D.H. Kang, S.S. Park, Y.S. Oh, N.J. Kim, Mater. Sci. Eng.A 449-451 (2007) 318-321. |
[8] | T.T. Sasaki, K. Oh-ishi, T. Ohkubo, K. Hono, Scr. Mater. 55 (2006) 251-254. |
[9] | C.L. Mendis, C.J. Bettles, M.A. Gibson, S. Gorsse, C.R. Hutchinson, Philos. Mag. Lett. 86 (2006) 443-456. |
[10] | P. Poddar, A. Kamaraj, A.P. Murugesan, S. Bagui, K.L. Sahoo, J. Magnes. Alloys 5 (2017) 348-354. |
[11] | C. Liu, H. Chen, J.F. Nie, Scr. Mater. 123 (2016) 5-8. |
[12] | C. Liu, H. Chen, C. He, Y. Zhang, J.F. Nie, Mater. Charact. 113 (2016) 214-221. |
[13] | Z. Zeng, N. Stanford, C.H.J. Davies, J.F. Nie, N. Birbilis , Int. Mater. Rev. (2018) 1-36. |
[14] | J.F. Nie, Metall. Mater. Trans. A 43 (2012) 3891-3939. |
[15] | W. Cheng, Y. Bai, S. Ma, L. Wang, H. Wang, H. Yu , J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 35 (2019) 1198-1209. |
[16] | C. Liu, C. Liu, H. Chen, J.F. Nie , J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 34 (2018) 284-290. |
[17] | P. Wang, E. Guo, X. Wang, H. Kang, Z. Chen, Z. Cao, T. Wang , J. Magnes. Alloys (2019). |
[18] | E. Karakulak, Y.B. Küçüker , J. Magnes. Alloys 6 (2018) 384-389. |
[19] | C.Q. Liu, H.W. Chen, H. Liu, X.J. Zhao, J.F. Nie, Acta Mater. 144 (2018) 590-600. |
[20] | D.A. Porter, K.E. Easterling, Phase Transformations in Metals and Alloys, third ed., 2009, Boca Raton. |
[21] | Q. Dong, Z. Luo, H. Zhu, L. Wang, T. Ying, Z. Jin, D. Li, W. Ding, X. Zeng , J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 34 (2018) 1773-1780. |
[22] | T.W. Fan, B.Y. Tang, L.M. Peng, W.J. Ding, Scr. Mater. 64 (2011) 942-945. |
[23] | L. Wen, P. Chen, Z.F. Tong, B.Y. Tang, L.M. Peng, W.J. Ding, Eur. Phys. J. B 72 (2009) 397-403. |
[24] | A.E. Smith, Sur. Sci. 601 (2007) 5762-5765. |
[25] |
N. Chetty, M. Weinert, Phys. Rev. B 56 (1997) 10844-10851.
DOI URL |
[26] | J. Han, X.M. Su, Z.H. Jin, Y.T. Zhu, Scr. Mater. 64 (2011) 693-696. |
[27] | Y. Wang, L.Q. Chen, Z.K. Liu, S.N. Mathaudhu, Scr. Mater. 62 (2010) 646-649. |
[28] | W.Y. Wang, S.L. Shang, Y. Wang, Z.G. Mei, K.A. Darling, L.J. Kecskes, S.N. Mathaudhu, X.D. Hui, Z.K. Liu, Mater. Res. Lett. 2 (2014) 29-36. |
[29] | B. Yin, Z. Wu, W.A. Curtin, Acta Mater. 123 (2017) 223-234. |
[30] | Q. Zhang, T.W. Fan, L. Fu, B.Y. Tang, L.M. Peng, W.J. Ding, Intermetallics 29 (2012) 21-26. |
[31] | H. Yu, Q. Dong, Z. Yao, M.R. Daymond, Scr. Mater. 141 (2017) 72-75. |
[32] | F. Wang, C.D. Barrett, R.J. McCabe, H.El Kadiri, L. Capolungo, S.R. Agnew, Acta Mater. 165 (2018) 471-485. |
[33] |
B. Zhou, M. Sui , J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 35 (2019) 2263-2268.
DOI URL |
[34] | D. Hull, D.J. Bacon, Introduction to Dislocations, fifth ed., 2011, Amsterdam. |
[35] | C. Liu, H. Chen, N. Wilson, J.F. Nie, Scr. Mater. 155 (2019) 89-93. |
[36] | J. Geng, M.F. Chisholm, R.K. Mishra, K.S. Kumar, Philos. Mag. Lett. 94 (2014) 377-386. |
[37] | Z. Yang, M.F. Chisholm, G. Duscher, X. Ma, S.J. Pennycook, Acta Mater. 61 (2013) 350-359. |
[38] | Z. Wu, W.A. Curtin, Nature 526 (2015) 62-67. |
[39] | Y.M. Zhu, A.J. Morton, M. Weyland, J.F. Nie, Acta Mater. 58 (2010) 464-475. |
[40] | H. Fan, J. Tang, X. Tian, Q. Wang, X. Tian, J.A. El-Awady, Scr. Mater. 135 (2017) 37-40. |
[41] | J. Koike, T. Kobayashi, T. Mukai, H. Watanabe, M. Suzuki, K. Maruyama, K. Higashi, Acta Mater. 51 (2003) 2055-2065. |
[42] | S. Sandlöbes, M. Friák, J. Neugebauer, D. Raabe, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 576 (2013) 61-68. |
[43] | L. Zhao, Y. Xin, F. Guo, H. Yu, Q. Liu, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 654 (2016) 344-351. |
[44] | S.R. Agnew, J.A. Horton, M.H. Yoo, Metall. Mater. Trans. A 33 (2002) 851-858. |
[45] | S.R. Agnew, L. Capolungo, C.A. Calhoun, Acta Mater. 82 (2015) 255-265. |
[46] | M. Muzyk, Z. Pakiela, K.J. Kurzydlowski, Scr. Mater. 66 (2012) 219-222. |
[47] |
S.L. Shang, W.Y. Wang, B.C. Zhou, Y. Wang, K.A. Darling, L.J. Kecskes, S.N. Mathaudhu, Z.K. Liu, Acta Mater. 67 (2014) 168-180.
DOI URL |
[48] | X. Gu, T. Furuhara, Mater. Trans. 55 (2014) 1662-1667. |
[49] | J.F. Nie, K. Oh-ishi, X. Gao, K. Hono, Acta Mater. 56 (2008) 6061-6076. |
[50] | Y.M. Zhu, M. Weyland, A.J. Morton, K. Oh-ishi, K. Hono, J.F. Nie, Scr. Mater. 60 (2009) 980-983. |
[51] | Y.M. Zhu, A.J. Morton, J.F. Nie, Acta Mater. 60 (2012) 6562-6572. |
[52] | J. Wang, P. Song, S. Huang, F. Pan, Mater. Lett. 93 (2013) 415-418.sbref0215. |
[53] | L. Zhao, Y. Xin, F. Guo, H. Yu, Q. Liu, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 654 (2016) 344-351. |
[54] | S.R. Agnew, J.A. Horton, M.H. Yoo, Metall. Mater. Trans. A 33 (2002) 851-858. |
[55] |
S.R. Agnew, L. Capolungo, C.A. Calhoun, Acta Mater. 82 (2015) 255-265.
DOI URL |
[56] |
M. Muzyk, Z. Pakiela, K.J. Kurzydlowski, Scr. Mater. 66 (2012) 219-222.
DOI URL |
[57] |
S.L. Shang, W.Y. Wang, B.C. Zhou, Y. Wang, K.A. Darling, L.J. Kecskes, S.N. Mathaudhu, Z.K. Liu, Acta Mater. 67 (2014) 168-180.
DOI URL |
[58] | X. Gu, T. Furuhara, Mater. Trans. 55 (2014) 1662-1667. |
[59] |
J.F. Nie, K. Oh-ishi, X. Gao, K. Hono, Acta Mater. 56 (2008) 6061-6076.
DOI URL |
[60] | Y.M. Zhu, M. Weyland, A.J. Morton, K. Oh-ishi, K. Hono, J.F. Nie, Scr. Mater. 60 (2009) 980-983. |
[61] |
Y.M. Zhu, A.J. Morton, J.F. Nie, Acta Mater. 60 (2012) 6562-6572.
DOI URL |
[62] | J. Wang, P. Song, S. Huang, F. Pan, Mater. Lett. 93 (2013) 415-418. |
[63] | C. Xu, M. Zheng, S. Xu, K. Wu, E. Wang, G. Fan, S. Kamado, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 643 (2015) 137-141. |
[64] | C. Xu, T. Nakata, X. Qiao, M. Zheng, K. Wu, S. Kamado, Sci. Rep. 7 (2017) 40846. |
[1] | Ying-Jun Gao, Qian-Qian Deng, Zhe-yuan Liu, Zong-Ji Huang, Yi-Xuan Li, Zhi-Rong Luo. Modes of grain growth and mechanism of dislocation reaction under applied biaxial strain: Atomistic and continuum modeling [J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2020, 49(0): 236-250. |
[2] | Cheng Liu, Yuman Zhu, Qun Luo, Bin Liu, Qinfen Gu, Qian Li. A 12R long-period stacking-ordered structure in a Mg-Ni-Y alloy [J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2018, 34(12): 2235-2239. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||