J. Mater. Sci. Technol. ›› 2015, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (11): 1065-1068.DOI: 10.1016/j.jmst.2015.09.012

• Orginal Article •     Next Articles

Correct Interpretation of Creep Rates: A Case Study of Cu

W. Blum1, J. Dvořák2, P. Král2, P. Eisenlohr3, V. Sklenička3   

  1. 1. Institut fur Werkstoffwissenschaften, University of Erlangen-Nurnberg, Martensstr. 5, D-91058 Erlangen, Germany; 2.Institute of Physics of Materials, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, ?i?kova 22, CZ61662 Brno, Czech Republic; 3. Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA
  • Received:2015-05-02 Online:2015-11-10
  • Contact: * Corresponding author. Prof., Dr.-Ing.; Tel.: +49 9131 63807.
  • Supported by:

    Financial support for this work was provided by the Central European Institute of Technology with research infrastructure supported by the project CZ.1.05/1.1.00/02.0068 granted by the European Regional Development Fund.

Abstract:

Traditionally the deformation resistance in creep is characterized by the minimum creep rate ε?min and its sensitivity to stress (stress exponent n) and temperature (activation energy Q). Various values of constant n have been reported in the literature and interpreted in terms of specific mechanisms. The present case study of coarse-grained Cu at 573 K yields a stress exponent n = 9 for ε?min in tension and a relatively low activation energy. The evolution of the deformation resistance with strain at constant tensile creep load and comparison with creep in compression without fracture indicates that the tensile ε?min result from transition from uniform deformation to strain localization during fracture. This is confirmed by the results of creep in compression where fracture is suppressed. Both the tensile ε?min and the compressive creep rate at strains around 0.3 can be described using existing equations for quasi-stationary deformation containing the subgrain boundary misorientation θ as structure parameter. While in the latter case constant θ leads to monotonic increase of n with stress, the tensile nine-power-law results from variable θ, and has no simple meaning. The result of this case study means that uncritical interpretation of minimum tensile creep rates as stationary ones bears a high risk of systematic errors in the determination of creep parameters and identification of creep mechanisms.

Key words: Cu, Creep, Minimum creep rate, Activation energy, Stress exponent